-  [WT]  [PS]  [Home] [Manage]

[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts] [First 100 posts]
Posting mode: Reply
  1.   (reply to 5739)
  2. (for post and file deletion)
/7ch/ - Site Discussion

IF YOU'RE GOING TO REPORT A SITE PROBLEM, MAKE SURE YOU PASTE THE URL.

IF YOU'RE GOING TO BITCH ABOUT A VIRUS ALERT, PASTE THE URL IT SAYS THE VIRUS IS COMING FROM

Thank you.

  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG, WEBM
  • Maximum file size allowed is 5000 KB.
  • Images greater than 200x200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 1051 unique user posts.

  • Blotter updated: 2011-01-12 Show/Hide Show All

There's a new /777/ up, it's /gardening/ Check it out. Suggest new /777/s here.

Movies & TV 24/7 via Channel7: Web Player, .m3u file. Music via Radio7: Web Player, .m3u file.

WebM is now available sitewide! Please check this thread for more info.

BOARD DESIGN REDUX Sazpaimon ## Admin ## 12/05/06(Sun)03:10 No. 5739

Hey guys, as you may have noticed, the Burichan theme has changed a bit. I'm experimenting with a new layout that should hopefully be easier on the eyes.

BEFORE YOU COMPLAIN:
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE allow yourself time to get used to it. If you have any actual legitimate concerns about the design, bring it up here.

KNOWN ISSUES:
The box to the right of the post box is missing a bottom margin
The box to the right of the post box has a lot of empty space (I have plans for this)
The omitted posts and expand all images text are somewhat oddly placed, I'm still working on that one


>>
Americium!Metal3G/gs 12/05/06(Sun)04:42 No. 5740

I like it. It's very minimal yet has everything required onscreen. I might change it up a bit for myself, but I like it.

8/10


>>
Yourgay!!OxAzMwZTMv 12/05/06(Sun)04:55 No. 5741

When you are replying to a thread, the coloring the box yhat says "Posting Mode: Reply" seems a little off considering the revised color scheme. Other than that I realize it's a eork in progress, and I do like the idea of a facelift, as long as we lose no functionality that we had before. And it would be cool to see things implemented yjat are elsewhere on this board (relinking to /rs/, adding frames back, etc.) within the framework of this nee design.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/06(Sun)05:32 No. 5742

>>5741
Frames are back. https://7chan.org/frames.php


>>
Sazpaimon 12/05/06(Sun)05:57 No. 5743

>>5742
If you read the news post when we first announced the new front page design, you would know that frames were never gone


>>
Anonymous 12/05/06(Sun)08:11 No. 5744
5744

File 133628468058.png - (213.55KB , 1341x818 , Untitled.png )

I like it but /gfx/ looks really weird right now. Maybe it's just me...


>>
Sazpaimon 12/05/06(Sun)09:41 No. 5745

>>5744
Thanks, I forgot /gfx/ is using the oekaki skin. I'll get on fixing that soon.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/06(Sun)11:00 No. 5746

Just my two cents but I really do not like this new layout. I have a fetish for minimalism and the extra indentation feels obnoxious to me. I also preferred the larger font as although posts appear more compact now they feel subjectively less "substantial".
Putting both the previous style and this new one as options would be ideal and much appreciated.
Thanks for /7ch/! It's my favourite chan.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/06(Sun)12:11 No. 5747

>>5746
>Just my two cents but I really do not like this new layout. I have a fetish for minimalism and the extra indentation feels obnoxious to me.

I agree, no idea about fonts though I have my whole web experience set to use Sans 8.

If I could make a suggestion, aimed towards other minimalistic fetishes, get rid of the xbox huge new thread creation box mess and have a simple "New Thread" link that will javamagic into the new thread mess.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/06(Sun)12:27 No. 5748
5748

File 133630007810.jpg - (107.21KB , 1900x240 , Untitled.jpg )


>>
Anonymous 12/05/06(Sun)13:24 No. 5749

noticed a couple of things, on /eh/ the message boxes for starting a new thread are above the box with /eh/ - particularly uninteresting conversation, and all that stuff, not next to it as with other boards

also the banners seem a bit small, i know it's not the case with all boards as there is text in the extra space, but i found it noticeable where there was nothing.

i think the font is a little small as well, but that's not that a big deal

stay classy, /7ch/


>>
Anonymous 12/05/06(Sun)14:31 No. 5754

I like the smart clean look. The less fussy it is the quicker it should run.

One suggestion though - an expand images option would be nice. Preferably one where you only expand the images in that individual post rather than the whole thread. You could put an icon to click under the >> on the left-hand side.


>>
tSade!O9S.2cqv5k 12/05/06(Sun)18:05 No. 5755

Padding on the first post inside the border would be nice. The text is a bit too close to the left side. The replies are fine though.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/06(Sun)19:17 No. 5756

I hate it. The little gaps between posts set off my OCD.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/06(Sun)21:20 No. 5757

>>5756
You don't have OCD.


>>
Hmmmmm. Anonymous 12/05/06(Sun)22:06 No. 5758
5758

File 133633476845.png - (157.37KB , 1360x768 , Screenshot-2.png )

Just a few of my thoughts


>>
Nattajerk 12/05/06(Sun)22:09 No. 5759

I'm not so sure I like it,

though only for a few reasons

i think posts within the same thread should have no padding, and the whitespace between threads should be just a little bit less.

it seems a little too obtuse. but thats just my opinion


>>
Nattajerk 12/05/06(Sun)22:12 No. 5760

the only thing that realy throws me off is the borders, though. kind of makes things look a little inelegant, or maybe its just because im not used to it. I can't be sure yet. perhaps the board list at the top could have its table removed anyhow.


>>
Sazpaimon 12/05/06(Sun)22:12 No. 5761

>>5754
You could always expand images by clicking the link to the file. I'm actually considering changing that to the image itself because the file link is no longer in a static position.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/07(Mon)00:23 No. 5763
5763

File 133634302437.jpg - (57.08KB , 620x599 , xerox-star.jpg )

The site now looks like shit, congratulations.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/07(Mon)00:25 No. 5764
5764

File 133634313588.png - (1.49KB , 193x26 , SLOWASFUCK.png )

And here I thought the previous 10s was bad, CONGRATULATIONS, SLOW AS FUCKING TITS, MY BEARD IS NOW FULL AFTER THIS POST.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/07(Mon)01:11 No. 5765

It's a bit too bland. Try emphasising more colors.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/07(Mon)02:22 No. 5766

IMO, it feels hard to discern when one thread starts and the other ends. With this new theme the thread starting posts look like the replies, due to the box things.
Also, the text is fucking tiny in /a/. It's almost unreadable.
However, I do have to agree with putting the board's purpose in a box right next to the reply/make thread area.


>>
Nattajerk 12/05/07(Mon)02:43 No. 5767

>>5764

- kusaba x 0.9 + SVN + Took 0.02s -

just a little blip perhaps


>>
Anonymous 12/05/07(Mon)03:06 No. 5768

We fear change.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/07(Mon)03:21 No. 5769

ok, here's my feedback

This shit is ugly as fuck, serves no real focus other than to look like shit, don't bother doing this and change it back and leave it the way it was.

PS "allow yourself time to get used to it" actually means "Deal with it" so fuck you, change it back.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/07(Mon)03:22 No. 5770

You know at first I thought the drop in 7chan was just due to a swing in popularity, but now I realize the people who run this site actually want to fucking ruin it.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/07(Mon)03:25 No. 5771

>>5770
oh and "changed a bit" is the dumbest fucking thing i've ever heard
"changed a fuck ton" is more accurate.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/07(Mon)03:31 No. 5772

>>5763
this
you've actually managed to make it look like your a fucking website thats several decades old
and with time i'm sure you'll be just like those sites, WITH NOBODY FUCKING GOING TO THEM ANYMORE


>>
Anonymous 12/05/07(Mon)03:33 No. 5773

I think its worth noting that the design is so fucking awful that people visiting think the fucking site is broken >>5737


>>
Sazpaimon 12/05/07(Mon)03:43 No. 5774

>>5773
Because at the time of the post the template *was* broken, with the reply link missing and text floating in weird places. Nice attempt, 3/10


>>
Anonymous 12/05/07(Mon)04:28 No. 5775

I dislike the new style.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/07(Mon)04:53 No. 5776

>>5766
I concur. There is very little to separate threads. And the text being smaller doesn't make any sense, especially in /a/.

In fact, /a/ was the first place I went after the change (not knowing about it beforehand), and I immediately switched to Futaba, just so I could read everything.

I know that people typically dislike change, but this is seriously a change for the worse. The new layout looks like shit, plain and simple. If you guys like it, at least make it an option, like >>5746 said, and don't force it on everyone. Or if you do, don't fuck with Futaba or Nigrachan. At least give us a chance to avoid this shit.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/07(Mon)11:14 No. 5777

How about swapping the time/date/thread number and the buttons/reply? That way the useful shit is right there in the middle and the reference stuff is off to the side. Your layout style is kept intact but the information / tools are arranged in a more useful way.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/07(Mon)14:07 No. 5778

I am not a fan of this new visual style. At least make it so that the divs conform to the size of the text in the post. I've got a 30" monitor and they are sooooo wide. Also, I think the margins and indentations are too big.

>Good try, but sorry, I'm not impressed.

Sorry about the negative feedback, I'll just stack this in the corner with the rest.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/07(Mon)15:11 No. 5779
5779

File 133639629162.png - (237.95KB , 1170x1376 , Untitled.png )

Here is my demands.

In the failure of my demands being met, I shall start sucking as many dicks as it takes to get this.

In other news, the layout has grew on me and I really like it, it's almost like I'm not still back in 2007.


>>
Sazpaimon 12/05/07(Mon)17:27 No. 5782

>>5779
Please give me more information, like, browser, OS, etc. The proper layout is with the posting box and box with the board name being side-by side. If you're getting that, something is not right.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/07(Mon)18:54 No. 5784

>>5782
>>5782
Gentoo & Firefox built from 12.0 source.
I know where it should be because sometimes it is there, rest of the time as soon as I load the page up it is there then instantly flashes down below.

Also, it is fine on Mozilla-Central (git) I just built this morning though.. so I would assume it's not my firefox settings or compile options (even though it only seems to be me getting it) buggering something up, I also tried fresh profiles with no add-ons and got the same result with both browsers.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/07(Mon)19:44 No. 5785

>>5784 Here,

I just went through all the boards and:
/gfx/ /a/ are the only boards that consistently show the layout how it is supposed to be, if that helps at all.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/07(Mon)20:30 No. 5786

>>5785, Here.
Sorry for this triple-post-faggotry but right now it all seems to be magically working.


>>
Sazpaimon 12/05/07(Mon)23:12 No. 5788

>>5748
Would you prefer if I made it so the board has a maximum width of say, 980 pixels and centered in the middle, or just make it so all the thread controls are to the left and nothing on the right? similar question for >>5778

>>5784
Hopefully the layout should be fixed for you.

I also increased the font size a bit, and fixed the tiny font in /a/ as well. I also moved the board header information into that box to give it some more content.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/07(Mon)23:43 No. 5791
5791

File 133642702688.png - (20.56KB , 452x295 , 2012-05-07-213954_1920x1080_scrot.png )

>>5788
It certainly is fixed now.

One little thing, it seems (only on this board after looking at a few random boards) there is a little extra/start of a new info box appeared.

Image related, and thank you for the great work.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/07(Mon)23:45 No. 5792

>>5790
I had that problem earlier but it seems fixed for me as of a few hours ago.

Also >>5791 here to samefag again,
Disregard that, I just realised that only happens when replying to a thread.


>>
Sazpaimon 12/05/07(Mon)23:56 No. 5793

>>5792
>>5791
Well I fixed it either way.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/08(Tue)00:04 No. 5794

>>5793
Nice one, thanks.


>>
Sazpaimon 12/05/08(Tue)00:54 No. 5796

>>5795
I plan on doing that once I can come up with an icon.

Also, reply links are back to the left, and you can now expand images by clicking them (the old way of clicking the file link still works as well)


>>
Sazpaimon 12/05/08(Tue)01:34 No. 5798

>>5796
update to this: double clicking makes the image open in a new window


>>
Sazpaimon 12/05/08(Tue)01:50 No. 5799

Replies no longer stretch to the width of the page. Hopefully this should help people who were having trouble telling threads apart.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/08(Tue)07:15 No. 5800

While the new layout looks pretty great and helps me keep followed threads organized, it seems that this layout does not work with the now-abandonware "Anonyma" application for iOS, which allows browsing and posting on this site as well as other chan-forums, etc.

Yes, it's an obscure issue, but the fix might be as simple as changing some class names, and it would help me a great deal. I'll try to find a solution, if one exists.


>>
Sazpaimon 12/05/08(Tue)08:16 No. 5801

>>5800
If it's any consolation, I'm working on a mobile theme for the near future anyway.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/08(Tue)11:56 No. 5802

Too much buffer space between everything.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/08(Tue)15:13 No. 5803

Boxes, boxes everywhere.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/08(Tue)15:39 No. 5804

>>5796
>you can now expand images by clicking them
Why would you change that? What was wrong with having just the link? Was there a problem that warranted the change? You had two different functions tied to the same action- one click to open, one click to preview. Elegant as fuck, probably the simplest way to do that kind of thing. Now you have this clunky double click shit.

The change is annoying because when I go through a thread, sometimes I will use the mouse wheel to click the images into other tabs. It was fast and easy. Perfect for reading comics or viewing sequences. When I click them with the mouse wheel now, I get a page stretching surprise and then I remember that you changed the function for apparently no reason.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/08(Tue)16:48 No. 5809

>>5805
Oh, so it's supposed to open in a new tab when you click with the wheel? That's not happening for me.

I'm using Chrome on 7 Ultimate.


>>
Sazpaimon 12/05/08(Tue)17:14 No. 5810

>>5804
3 reasons really:
1. The old way was surprisingly not well known. I've found myself, on numerous occasions, telling users of this functionality.
2. It brings the feature in line with other popular imageboards.
3. The new skin left the image info area in a non-static position, so if one wanted to quickly expand and then shrink an image, it would require a mouse movement.

It should be noted, that middle clicking images to open them in a new tab still works normally. The double click is mostly for users without a middle click button (like laptop users).


>>
Anonymous 12/05/08(Tue)17:19 No. 5811

>>5810
I understand, that makes sense. What I found was that the middle click doesn't work in chrome. Or at least, it doesn't work for me in chrome.


>>
Sazpaimon 12/05/08(Tue)17:54 No. 5812

>>5811
You're right. I did some research and found out that it's actually a Webkit bug from years ago (ref: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22382 ). I went ahead and hopefully fixed it.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/08(Tue)17:58 No. 5814

>>5812
Yes, it works now.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/08(Tue)22:47 No. 5815

>>5800
>new layout looks pretty great
Get your eyes checked you fuck.
Blocks stacked on fucking blocks.
Welcome to back to the shitty 90s internet.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/08(Tue)23:51 No. 5816

>>5815
Okay, let me rephrase:

The new interface looks better than not having an interface, and I like that the threads are separated by squares.


There was nothing "good" about the old look, anyway. People just got used to it, just as they will with whatever happens here.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/09(Wed)05:43 No. 5817

>>5816
No, you like the shitty "interface". It isn't better than the old one, it is infact worse.
Asthetically there was not one single fucking reason to change it.
Threads are not seperated by boxes (which by the way would look even fucking worse), they are still seperated only by lines. The posts are all boxed, which also looks cluttered and shitty. Boxing fucking everything is a stupid ass thing to do. You want to add new features to the sites design? Fine. But don't go fucking up the entire site just because you want to be a faggot and make everything look different.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/09(Wed)06:44 No. 5818

>>5817
Aggression will make people more likely to listen, but less likely to take you seriously.


>>
neonbass 12/05/09(Wed)07:10 No. 5819
5819

File 133654025670.jpg - (85.37KB , 1022x768 , 130722803094-brilliant.jpg )

I personally don't like it when you click on a picture with the mouse wheel ( button between left click & right click) that the picture expands and not open a new tab other than that i like the new look.


>>
Sazpaimon 12/05/09(Wed)08:38 No. 5820

>>5819
See >>5809 to >>5812 because this has been fixed already. Make sure your cache is clear and try again.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/09(Wed)22:06 No. 5822

>>5817
Sir, this thread is for legitimate complaints, not bitching about change.

As far as legitimate concerns go, it's unusual to me that the 'expand image' link that I've grown so fond of now has the exact same purpose as actually clicking on the image.

Why not swap the functions? Instead of clicking on the image to go to the file, you click on the link, that way you don't have two links doing the exact same thing right next to each other.


>>
Sazpaimon 12/05/10(Thu)00:19 No. 5824

>>5822
The reason why the file link still expands is purely for transitional purposes. Once enough time has gone by whereby people are acclimated to the new location of the function, it will be removed.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/10(Thu)02:03 No. 5825

For what it's worth, I approve of the changes. I generally only use a fairly old Acer laptop and some of the old bugs I was getting seem so be fixed now.
I am posting this from my phone though to see how it handles it.


>>
Yourgay!!OxAzMwZTMv 12/05/10(Thu)04:41 No. 5826

Nothing I have seen so far. However is there anyway we could be able to embed for more sites (Redtube, Hulu, dailymotion, etc.) . More themes (which you mentioned earlier. Think of something uniquely 7chan.). And of course, my old holdout, a link to /rs/ on the top anf bottom menus. All things for future consideration once the bugs are ironed out.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/10(Thu)16:08 No. 5827

It's shit.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/10(Thu)21:49 No. 5829
5829

File 133667939032.png - (96.58KB , 1050x649 , 2012-05-10-183550_1920x1080_scrot.png )

Suggestion, pic related. Slightly better use of space when there is a "large" list?
Or perhaps possible, if the info box is rather long, the posting form can be centred vertically to make it at least seem like less empty space?

Also, not sure if any others but /gfx/ still uses the old title up top rather then the info box.

>>5827
So iz ur mum in bed.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/11(Fri)01:03 No. 5831

The character select doesn't work on the Touhou thread in the Hentai Section, but I've used it before. I don't know if it's a bug or not,but it could be.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/12(Sat)00:09 No. 5834

>>5739
I really, really like it. There's some good discussion of minutiae ITT, but thanks for doing this.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/12(Sat)08:44 No. 5839

It's shit.
You're not making anything better.
Change it the fuck back, you stupid fucking asshole.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/12(Sat)08:46 No. 5840

>>5839
OH, and by the way.
>should hopefully be easier on the eyes
You did the fucking opposite.
You can't even argue that the fucking boxes are "easier on the eyes". They aren't.
Its fucking cluttered.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/12(Sat)08:58 No. 5841
5841

File 133680591321.png - (91.01KB , 767x431 , Clipboard01.png )

While navigating a board, I get the feeling that there aren't enough visual cues showing that a post is part of a thread. I get that the idea behind the design is to highlight the OP, but as it is now, it looks like the OP and the rest of the posts are entirely separate entities. Maybe it would help to make the line separating threads more visually striking.


>>
Sazpaimon 12/05/12(Sat)09:16 No. 5842

>>5841
I made the divider a bit more visible around the edges, let me know if that's any better.

Also, new stuff:
The rules area is now tabbed, and the watched threads, style selector, and post spy toggle are now there.
Watched threads are also smarter, and will show watched threads across the entire site, rather than the board you're currently viewing. The tab's title will also update with the number of new posts, among other things.
"Expand all images" is now a button on the right of the OP header.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/12(Sat)15:56 No. 5843

>>5842
It is. Thanks.


>>
Sazpaimon 12/05/12(Sat)21:12 No. 5845

>>5844
The expand all images button appears when a thread expands on the board view. Are you suggesting it show up even when the thread is just the OP and 3 replies?


>>
Anonymous 12/05/13(Sun)06:23 No. 5850

God, what a fucking eye sore.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/13(Sun)19:49 No. 5853

Terrible, terrible. Please change it back.


>>
Demis 12/05/13(Sun)21:10 No. 5855

When viewing posts in reply mode, the facility to enlarge all images has gone. May we have it back please?


>>
Demis 12/05/13(Sun)21:13 No. 5856

When one goes to the reply mode - eg http://7chan.org/sm/res/18236.html - the facility to click on 'enlarge all images' has disappeared - may we have it back please?


>>
Sazpaimon 12/05/13(Sun)22:13 No. 5857

>>5855
see >>5842


>>
Natrinec 12/05/14(Mon)03:55 No. 5858

Did a file dump of about 20MB or something, afterwards the thread disappeared, unable to view the thread :(


>>
Anonymous 12/05/14(Mon)03:55 No. 5859
5859

File 133696053236.jpg - (85.11KB , 777x401 , fw.jpg )

Post preview is broken outside threads


>>
ice!.RAPE.curg 12/05/14(Mon)04:12 No. 5860

>>5858
this?
https://7chan.org/fur/res/9985.html#11750


>>
Sazpaimon 12/05/14(Mon)04:53 No. 5861

>>5858
>>5859
Sorry about that. Something weird happened with the template code and it caused the compiled templates to be deleted. All is well now, though.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/14(Mon)08:45 No. 5863
5863

File 133697791111.jpg - (35.79KB , 435x435 , 1334475427920.jpg )

I can't say I'm fond with the decision to change the already minimal and perfect layout.

The old saying if it isn't broken don't fix it applies here and with emphasis.

I just felt like I was viewing a 4Chan 2.0, something I would have never expected from this site.

If you do indeed add this new layout, is it possible to at least keep the old versions available to those who would like to use it?


>>
ice!.RAPE.curg 12/05/14(Mon)14:22 No. 5864

>>5863
what the fuck do you mean "if"?


>>
Anonymous 12/05/14(Mon)17:04 No. 5865

>>5809
>>5809
>>5812
>>5814

I am still having this issue with chrome.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/14(Mon)17:08 No. 5866

I love that the expand all images button is now in line with the other ones. Keep up the good work guys.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/14(Mon)20:39 No. 5868

I think we should make the delete button more prominent so that bullshit like this doesn't happen as often.

>>/vg/132913
>>/vg/132914
>>/vg/132915
>>/vg/132918
>>/vg/132919
>>/vg/132920


>>
Sazpaimon 12/05/15(Tue)06:07 No. 5871

>>5869
It shows a dialog at the bottom of the page


>>
Anonymous 12/05/16(Wed)11:19 No. 5877

GET RID OF THE FAGGOT ASS BOXES
FUCKING EYE SORES
EVERY FUCKING POST DOES NOT NEED A FUCKING BOXED BORDER
CHANGE IT BACK


>>
Glitches 12/05/16(Wed)18:18 No. 5878

It looks okay, but the expanding image thing is really irritating. I saw there was some bug with wheel-clicking and tabs, but whenever I Ctrl-click it still expands it. And not only is it a huge blurry mess when I first open it (which kills any deesire I have to look at the image), but since I'm on a laptop with a small resolution there is no convenient way to look at anything without having to scroll around a lot.

I usually open images up and then look at them all later anyway, so this is pretty off-putting. Could you at least fix Ctrl-click opening up the pics in a new tab, if you could fix wheel-clicking??


>>
Sazpaimon 12/05/16(Wed)20:44 No. 5881

>>5878
Done


>>
Glitches 12/05/17(Thu)07:29 No. 5887

Sweet, many thanks.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/18(Fri)08:57 No. 5895

My only complaint is with pictures that are way too large for my computer screen. It would be nice to have a page where it shows just the image which automatically fits the picture in the screen. I've noticed that clicking both the thumbnail and the filename both enlarge the pic. I think one of them should open a new tab with just the image. Idk. Some images are just practically impossible to view correctly at such high resolutions so multiple viewing options would be nice.


>>
Sazpaimon 12/05/18(Fri)09:57 No. 5896

>>5895
Again, the filename expand function will eventually go away once people figure out the new method. You can still middle click the thumbnail, and also double click it, to open in a new tab.


>>
Anonymous 12/05/18(Fri)14:38 No. 5899

I hate the new design, why cant you be happy with what god plantted on the green earth.
It's natural, it grows out of the ground.


96 posts omitted. First 100 shown.
[Return]


Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason