-  [WT]  [PS]  [Home] [Manage]

[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts] [First 100 posts]
Posting mode: Reply
  1.   (reply to 7699)
  2. (for post and file deletion)
/7ch/ - Site Discussion



Thank you.

  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG, WEBM
  • Maximum file size allowed is 5000 KB.
  • Images greater than 200x200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 939 unique user posts.

  • Blotter updated: 2011-01-12 Show/Hide Show All

There's a new /777/ up, it's /Trump/ - Make America Great Again! Check it out. Suggest new /777/s here.

Movies & TV 24/7 via Channel7: Web Player, .m3u file. Music via Radio7: Web Player, .m3u file.

WebM is now available sitewide! Please check this thread for more info.

Temporary board removal Sazpaimon ## Admin ## 13/10/24(Thu)12:28 No. 7699

Due to a complaint from our host, /sm/ has been temporarily removed. We'll be working with them to determine if the complaint is valid, and will move /sm/ to a different host if need be.

Anonymous 13/10/24(Thu)13:18 No. 7700


Anonymous 13/10/24(Thu)13:44 No. 7701

What was the complaint?

Sazpaimon ## Admin ## 13/10/24(Thu)17:48 No. 7702

The Russian government sent a complaint about /sm/ being CP, which our hosts seem to agree with:

"Yes, this content is also called Lolicon (Young Girls or Shotacon
(Young Boys) and ist also childporn."

So I guess I'll be looking for a new host. Shame because I already prepaid for November for the new server I just ordered.

Anonymous 13/10/24(Thu)21:18 No. 7703

>I already prepaid for November for the new server I just ordered.
You could stall the return of /sm/ till December, make good on the money you've already paid and bring it back for Christmas. Just be sure to lock and leave a note on /sm/ so people know it will be back. It also leaves you plenty of time to find a new server rather than having the community rush you to make a decision in appeasement.

Anonymous 13/10/24(Thu)22:48 No. 7704

b-but anon, a month without /sm/?

CandleJack 13/10/25(Fri)00:28 No. 7705

>Receives a complaint about cartoon child-porn.
>Removes only one of three boards with such content.

You're a bunch of fucking geniuses, really. How long are you going to continue this charade of pretending like this isn't an exclusive attack on homosexual content?

Anonymous 13/10/25(Fri)02:22 No. 7706

What are you talking about? /men/, the crossdressing board, etc. are all still here. /be/ wasn't even a homosexual board and we all know that was a shit board anyway.

If the complain was only received about /sm/ then it makes sense to remove only /sm/. Sure the fact that they would report /sm/ and not /cake/ or /ss/ is odd, but I'm not going to call shenanigans after good intentions have been voiced. I just want /sm/ back and I'm not going to bitch and whine when we're being told we're going to get it back. Wait until it's been shown otherwise to whine about it.

Sazpaimon 13/10/25(Fri)06:32 No. 7707

What >>7706 said. Also, the only reason /sm/ was affected was because that was the only board reported by the complainant. Not sure how they missed /cake/ and /sm/, maybe their names are less obvious, but it can be assumed that they're equally at risk.

In other news, I believe I've secured hosting in a Romanian datacenter, but nothing is set in stone yet.

Anonymous 13/10/25(Fri)08:22 No. 7708

They only complained about SM? That's fucking ridiculous. There's at least two other boards with similar content and yet they go unnoticed and are told to carry on.

Anonymous 13/10/25(Fri)11:27 No. 7710

There's no such thing as "2D child porn" There is CP and there is "shotacon" and "lolicon". Learn the difference

Anonymous 13/10/25(Fri)19:36 No. 7711

Hum i get.

If i say this is a boy 10yo, sporting a erection. And a man 30yo fucking in. That's childporn? Or you guys have to say that too?

0 \0/
|`_ |/
/ \ / \

Man... they ruined the world!
Anyone! Please blown up this shit!

Anonymous 13/10/26(Sat)17:19 No. 7713

I'll have to go with the admin on this one. Some countries have laws against shota and loli. I know it doesn't make sense, but we are in no legal place to object to it. I guess we'll just have to endure this. I really hope it resolves in our favor though, because there are less and less shota boards left.

Anonymous 13/10/26(Sat)20:06 No. 7715

Russia pls fucking deal with it. It's only because it's involving homesexuality that they have a problem

Anonymous 13/10/28(Mon)00:50 No. 7718

And Russia, I heard you are pretty damn high on the list of manufacturing real life /sm/. Hypocrite much? Only they can't expect to take on the mafia and win.

Anonymous 13/10/28(Mon)04:49 No. 7720

Says the Russian government whom hasn't anything to stop CP in Russia in the first place and now they are comparing Lolicon and Shotacon as CP?

Maybe they need set pairs of glasses to see better.

Anonymous 13/10/31(Thu)19:14 No. 7730

maybe it was all the "real life" shota stories that got out of hand...

Anonymous 13/11/01(Fri)02:33 No. 7731

If you're protecting imaginary children, I should be able to pay my taxes with imaginary money.

Anonymous 13/11/02(Sat)03:43 No. 7734

But they know which authorities to pay bribes to. And they're Russian, so therefore they can do no wrong... as long as the money keeps flowing.

Anonymous 13/11/02(Sat)16:52 No. 7736

did they complain about the yaoi board too?

Anonymous 13/11/06(Wed)00:25 No. 7756


Anonymous 13/11/06(Wed)09:37 No. 7757

Man, russian goverment is bad for real, I've left Russia 3 years ago.My parents tell me that in Russia now Pedo-hysteria. It's sad as shit.
Proof that I'm russian: РОИССЯ ВПЕРДЕ.
P.s : Try japanice(or Guatemala) hosting.

Anonymous 13/11/06(Wed)12:28 No. 7758

That's bad, but couldn't a smart, upstanding young gentleman turn this to advantage? e.g. "You don't want to be like those barbaric vodka-besotted slavs, do you? Come, let's be rational about these cartoons."

There's probably a huge hole in this that I haven't located, but maybe...

Anonymous 13/11/06(Wed)12:29 No. 7759

Not that you're personally bydlo, of course.

Anonymous 13/11/07(Thu)02:02 No. 7761

Pedohysteria roughly describes the United States for the past couple decades.

Anonymous 13/11/07(Thu)09:38 No. 7762


The sentence for molesting a child is always higher than that for assaulting a child (ie: if I walk up to a random kid and touch their privates, I'll get more jail time than if I walk up to them and kick them in the privates hard enough to result in hospitalization). The sentence for molesting a child CAN be higher than that for murdering a child, depending on the degree of either. A violent rapist can get out of jail in a few decades; a person who has a few gigs of kiddy porn pics on their computer and who never so much as touched a child can get life-imprisonment.

The scariest thing is that most people are perfectly okay with this and think it logical and rational. I've frequently seen pundits and talk show hosts speak about how child molesters (even the petty, nonviolent ones) are the worst evil on the planet, in the same sentence as the likes of Adolf Hitler and Osama bin Laden, occasionally mentioning how they would like to torture them. The result of this is invariably thunderous applause.

Now, I know that crime is crime, and rape is bad, and children can be helpless. Nobody here is advocating decriminalizing such things. But madness is also madness, clear and simple; and when you start equating the non-violent criminals with the torture-rapists and applying the same criminal levies to both, that is madness; when you start taking bunches of pixels on a screen and ending someone's life for daring to look at it, that is madness.

(The only reason why gay rights have advanced in the Western world over the past few decades is because the moral panic has shifted from homosexuals to pedophiles. Look up some anti-homosexual propaganda from the 1950's — they were equated with child-rapists, too. Before that it was the Japanese/nazis, and before that it was the niggers, and before that it was the Indians, etc, etc, etc. Society seemingly CANNOT FUNCTION without a large group to hate and to fantasize about protecting their children from, preferably by rounding up them all up and starting a bonfire, because a fair trial is only for "us", not "them".

Anonymous 13/11/07(Thu)16:08 No. 7763


The worst part about doing anything legally against loli (and also the part why anyone bothers) is that it represents a shift in the way we go after crime, from policing actions to policing thoughts.

The most Russian thing about this, in the Soviet sense, is that it's their way of saying "We don't need you to actually commit a crime for us to go after you". That's why Bush wanted to outlaw that kind of thing, that's why that one fringe Japanese fascist does, that's why that Russian establishment is.

If you can overcome the block against arresting people over fiction, eventually you can arrest them, literally, over fiction.

Anonymous 13/11/07(Thu)16:09 No. 7764


Also, mad props to 7chan for their service and I hope they get their moe-and-penises board back.

CandleJack 13/11/07(Thu)23:17 No. 7766


Exactly correct. This so-called pedohysteria is the one area where society has allowed the concept of thoughtcrime to take hold. We don't imprison people for thinking about using drugs; we get them help. We don't imprison people for thinking about committing a robbery; we get them help. We don't imprison people for thinking about murder; we put them under close watch and get them help.

But if someone admits they are a pedophile, most people would support forcible imprisonment and castration, even if they didn't commit any crime.

You know about doctor/patient confidentiality? Usually, this exists between psychologists/psychiatrists and their patients, too. If you go to your shrink and tell them you've been having thoughts about relapsing into drugs, he won't tell anyone. If you go to your shrink and tell him you've been having thoughts about having sex with your mother, he won't tell anyone. If you tell him that you've been having sexual fantasies about a child, or even imply it, he is LEGALLY OBLIGATED TO INFORM THE POLICE. You will be arrested (no judge, and I mean NO judge will refuse to issue a warrant in that case) without cause, and your house and computer searched. If they find lolicon, that combined with the "confession" to your shrink will probably be enough to result in a conviction for possession of it. No jail time, but you'll be on the sex-offender's list for life.

This is thoughtcrime. This is the future.

Anonymous 13/11/09(Sat)11:24 No. 7770

File 138399269860.png - (736.18KB , 773x578 , smile__by_l_e_n_and_l_u_k_a-d53n6yz.png )

>This is the future.
The future is closer than you think.

Jamie Kunsler 13/11/10(Sun)21:32 No. 7772

So am I the only one who just likes that they don't block as much of that hot chick, and those babes tend to be much more voluptuous, which is to my taste. The only reason I am not more into the whole dwarf thing is their bodies are all out of proportion and it is too distracting.

Anonymous 13/11/10(Sun)22:51 No. 7773


You do realize yuri is a thing, right? Lots of them are pretty busty, too, if you know what I mean. Double the pleasure?

(All joking aside, I understand that a lot of SS is male self-insert fantasy. I don't think I've ever seen it where the "boy" doesn't have an adult-sized penis. Many men like the idea of screwing a big girl, at whatever age they first started getting boners thinking about big girls; however, few men like the idea of screwing said big girl with a three-inch penis. In any case, it's irrelevant to this topic, as /ss is still here.)

Freeder 13/11/13(Wed)04:18 No. 7775

There are many pedophiles that do not offend (VirPed.org), and most of them are against real CP.

Anonymous 13/11/13(Wed)22:00 No. 7776


Lolicon/shotacon isn't the same as real CP. And nobody is going to admit they LIKE that stuff on a public forum where the FBI/CIA/WTF/XYZ are watching, because that's like saying to anyone who might be there, "ehy, I've got CP on my computer, plz trace my IP and then come crashing down my door!"

It's thoughtcrime, remember?

Anonymous 13/11/14(Thu)02:52 No. 7777

I want my board back now please

Anonymous 13/11/18(Mon)02:21 No. 7783

Where do I go for shota guys?

Anonymous 13/11/18(Mon)02:26 No. 7784

Google is your friend, seriously. Turn of the image filters and do an image search for it.

CandleJack 13/11/18(Mon)23:12 No. 7789


Alterdz has a great shotacon imageboard. It's in Spanish, but it's not required to understand it or even have an account to navigate and view the pictures.

Rule34 and Gelbooru have some shota if you're willing to weed through everything else and have certain characters/fandoms in mind to search for the tags. Unlike Rule34, on gelbooru, there is even a tag for "shota" that returns roughly 24000 pictures, and also tags for fetishes and physical characteristics so you can narrow your interests.

I've heard genkiforum is pretty good (I was a member, using a different "identity", before they rebooted it a few years ago), but they require registration for an account to see anything, so I haven't been there as I prefer total anonymity these days where I can.

Shotachan (as the name suggests) used to be an open imageboard, but it's been recently transformed into another registration-required forum.

Littleangelshentai is mostly loli, but has a healthy shota subsection. However, like the above, you can't view any images without having an account. All the threads just appear "empty".

Honestly, that's about it. Five-eight years ago, shota was all over the place. But as more and more countries started equating it with CP, more and more hosts no longer allow it. Almost all active /chan boards have dropped it — after the transformation of shotachan, this was literally THE LAST ONE LEFT.

There might be some more foreign-language sites that I don't know about. Maybe ask about it on one of the forums if you want to hazard making an account.

>Google is your friend

I tried that. Got almost all softcore stuff, ALL THE DEVIANTART, and lots of Hetalia screenshots.

Tried "shotacon", got ALL THE DEMOTIVATORS , lots of 3D stuff, and some image hosts.

Tried "ショタコン", and got mostly scans from doujins (and, hilariously, a couple from HunterXHunter) and softcore headshots of boys from various animes.

It's really hit or miss using google.

In Today's Inbox N3X15!QeYBaiERz2!!WyLzD2MQAz ## Admin ## 13/11/19(Tue)00:25 No. 7790


We should inform you that the URL

http://7chan.org/cake/ (located on IP:

http://7chan.org/h/ (located on IP:

contains child pornography.

According to the Federal Law of July 27, 2006 № 149-FZ "On Information, Information Technology and Information Security» (http://eais.rkn.gov.ru/docs.eng/149.pdf) and the resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation on October 26, 2012 № 1101 (http://eais.rkn.gov.ru/docs.eng/1101.pdf) this IP address and URL will be included to the "Unified register of domain names, Internet web-site page links and network addresses enabling to identify the Internet web-sites containing the information prohibited for public distribution in the Russian Federation” and will be blocked by communication operators on the territory of the Russian Federation.

Please inform us about the removal of information in the shortest time possible.

Thank you for your cooperation!


Federal Service for Supervision in the Sphere of Telecom, Information Technologies and Mass Communications (ROSKOMNADZOR).

Anonymous 13/11/19(Tue)00:34 No. 7791

Seems more boards have gotta go. Thanks for keeping us in the loop.

Anonymous 13/11/19(Tue)01:34 No. 7792

why not just move to a new server? this is lame. 7chan was the last vestige for frequented boards of these fetishes. it's not fucking CP. god damn it, internet privacy is disappearing... it's just fucking ART, im so pissed.

please fight this, 7chan.

Anonymous 13/11/19(Tue)01:48 No. 7793



Anonymous 13/11/19(Tue)05:15 No. 7794

Gelbooru is a great source for a lot of shota.

Anonymous 13/11/19(Tue)05:20 No. 7795

Well, since it seems like /cake/ and even /h/ are bound to go, when are we actually getting this new hosting for these boards?

Anonymous 13/11/19(Tue)06:12 No. 7796


Actually, 99chan has cake and shota boards.

CandleJack 13/11/19(Tue)09:34 No. 7797

>99chan has ... shota

It has half of one page. I omitted it because it's a waste of time. 99chan is good for a lot of stuff, but shota isn't really one of them. I used to post there ages ago, and the discussion were pretty lively. I might go back.

Anonymous 13/11/19(Tue)20:59 No. 7799

when i get my body transplant/cute injection i'm gonna rub my shota balls all over the nkvd's fucking face

CandleJack 13/11/19(Tue)23:59 No. 7800


I hope they invent that kind of fantasy body-modification before I die. I'd like to make myself 10-years-old again and have Boku no Pico adventures every single freaking day like I used to.

Anonymous 13/11/21(Thu)04:27 No. 7805

And yet image source dot ru is still up


Anonymous 13/11/21(Thu)04:45 No. 7806


the server is hosted in Netherlands.

in 2002, it was illegal to view realistic images representing a minor engaged in a sexually explicit conduct.

but, in January 2011, non-realistic pictures was included.

so i guess your post is breaking the law :P

also, in the UK, CP is calculated on a scale of one to 5, 5 being the worsed kind of CP, and loli is classed as 5/5....

in the USA, loli is classed as art, thus does not have the same rules.

CandleJack 13/11/21(Thu)06:27 No. 7807


Some clarifications:

The UK law works based on how explicit the image is. Thus, it depends more on whether the child, real or fictional, is simply undressed or engaged in hardcore sex that determines how high the "rating" is. This is in contrast to the way the USA does things, which puts a picture of an infant being brutally raped and a picture of an infant naked in a bathtub in roughly the same category.

In the USA, there is something called the Miller Test, which basically determines whether a piece of media can be protected under the first amendment (freedom of speech/expression) by asking whether or not it is obscene. It is threefold, asking whether said piece: 1) would be considered obscene by the average person, 2) contain obvious sexual content, 3) has no artistic merit or value. Only a "yes" to all three means the piece is obscene and thus not protected.

The third is the most difficult to determine and thus is the easiest "escape". For example, the famous piece My Lonesome Cowboy is a sculpture of a nude, arguably-teenaged, anime-style boy transforming his semen into a lasso. Most people would be horrified by such a thing, and it's clearly sexual content. However, it is still protected because it is considered a piece of artwork with cultural value.

However, mere loli pictures cannot really be considered as having such value; it is merely pornography. In practice, it is NOT considered art with value, so it IS considered obscene, so it is NOT protected! You won't get FBI agents crashing down your door like they will for real child porn (well, probably not), but if you're caught with it, you will face criminal penalties for having it. It's happened before.

TL:DR - Loli isn't protected under the first amendment in the USA. It's loosely considered child pornography, but enforcement is lax because there are bigger fish to fry.

Anonymous 13/11/21(Thu)07:42 No. 7809

In CA loli is officially considered not obscene. Its one of the few good things about this state.

Anonymous 13/11/21(Thu)13:15 No. 7810

What does CA say about shota?

Sazpaimon 13/11/21(Thu)17:40 No. 7811

Sorry about the delay. My girlfriend and I had to put down our cat last week, and we got two kittens this week, both of these events ran me dry for this month. and the payout from the ad company is taking longer than I expected. Give me a few more days to get the funds secured.

Anonymous 13/11/24(Sun)08:40 No. 7817

File 138527884018.jpg - (75.71KB , 470x600 , 1582157.jpg )

If you need any money, ask the users. Id be sure to give to bring back /sm/

Anonymous 13/11/24(Sun)10:59 No. 7818

So I'm kinda wondering. It's been almost five days since it was mentioned that /cake and /h have to go, for the same reason as /sm.

So............ WHY are they still here??

Anonymous 13/11/26(Tue)04:05 No. 7821

they hate gays here;_;

Anonymous 13/11/26(Tue)04:44 No. 7822

If he takes bitcoins I could help

anything to spite the moralfags

Anonymous 13/11/27(Wed)13:07 No. 7824


Hasn't Russia been the number one or so producer of legitimate child abuse material for years?

Only now do they care? And they take action against obvious, yet helpless targets that will achieve nothing?

Anonymous 13/11/30(Sat)20:13 No. 7830

Russia is number one boner killer

Anonymous 13/12/01(Sun)00:11 No. 7831

You're all a bunch of pedo nonces.

Anonymous 13/12/01(Sun)19:54 No. 7833

File 13859240401.jpg - (85.84KB , 500x379 , 1349388710033.jpg )

I wish I could hold all these edges but I cannot.

Anonymous 13/12/02(Mon)00:10 No. 7835

My first thought when I saw the board was missing. I don't understand why that was allowed, and STICKIED nonetheless. The loli/ss boards explicitly banned things like that.

From what I saw, the stories were really just bullshit and bragging about how anon fucked their classmate when they were 10, but that thread was begging for trouble.

But now that I hear it was the Russian government...I'm wondering if the board really could have avoided the deletion if we banned the "real shota" stories.

Anonymous 13/12/03(Tue)03:00 No. 7839

I just want muh shota back

Anonymous 13/12/03(Tue)19:59 No. 7840

Everyone wants to, everyone.

Matchbox Prince 13/12/07(Sat)20:50 No. 7849

So, it's December, and nothing has changed.

It's been over two weeks since /cake and /h were supposedly about to be purged like /sm was because the host demanded it. Nothing has changed.

When are you going to stop lying to us, guys? Couldn't you just admit that you simply don't LIKE gay shotacon (and bestiality, and whatever else you get rid of) and that's the only reason why it's gone? It's okay; you own the damn board, so do what you please. Just cut the bullshit, already.

>I'm wondering if the board really could have avoided the deletion if we banned the "real shota" stories.

Photographs and non-real "pictures" are one thing, but there is no modern country on Earth than has criminalized or banned the written word, in any form. The Diary of Anne Frank includes a bit where she sexually experiments with her cousin; the stuff on /sm was no different from that except in detail (and being mostly false).

Anonymous 13/12/07(Sat)21:06 No. 7850

File 138644676277.jpg - (151.55KB , 800x800 , 138176720360.jpg )

It's my shota and I want it now

Sazpaimon 13/12/08(Sun)01:29 No. 7851

/sm/ only got removed once our hosts got the email from the Ruskies. Thus far that doesn't seemed to have happened for /cake/ and /h/, or if they have, they haven't yet acted on it.

And for the record, I'm not going to remove a board because of personal reasons. Why would I willingly take away traffic from the site? I don't enjoy anime, but you don't see me getting rid of /a/.

Also status update. I have the new server, I'm going to work on setting it up over this weekend.

new server all about the shota 13/12/09(Mon)05:54 No. 7853

thanx for ur effort to get /sm back up and running. cant wait to see it!

F/ I_S//h-y 13/12/09(Mon)06:34 No. 7854

File 138656728694.png - (470.99KB , 625x426 , 1386554171261.png )


Anonymous 13/12/10(Tue)03:42 No. 7856

Where can someone find more Shota?

Anonymous 13/12/15(Sun)12:17 No. 7865

Not in Russia, apparently.

Sazpaimon ## Admin ## 13/12/16(Mon)04:16 No. 7866

Hey guys,

The server move is complete, and as promised, /sm/ is restored.

Anonymous 13/12/16(Mon)05:18 No. 7867

Thanks for all you hard work!

Anonymous 13/12/17(Tue)02:01 No. 7869

File 138724210747.jpg - (164.84KB , 1500x1500 , 4.jpg )

Now this awesome corner of the internet is complete.

Anonymous 13/12/17(Tue)09:07 No. 7870

You're awesome, Saz.

Anonymous 13/12/17(Tue)11:39 No. 7871

Thanks. I love you.

Anonymous 13/12/18(Wed)21:27 No. 7874




/sm all about the shota 13/12/19(Thu)04:08 No. 7875

it was really nice to see the webpage back up and running again. thanx again for ur work and promises kept.

Anonymous 13/12/19(Thu)23:33 No. 7877

Whoa, this is unexpected. I didn't expect to see /sm/ again. Thank you so much!
(if we could have /be/ back as well, that would be great)

Sazpaimon 13/12/20(Fri)02:27 No. 7878

I'm still figuring out what to do about /be/. The main problem is figuring out where to draw the line between animal abuse and zoophilia. The case can be made that all zoophilia is animal abuse. You can also specifically call different acts abuse. It's very hard to draw a line that pleases enough people to make the board popular enough to keep around, and also find moderators that can keep that line in place.

Matchbox Prince 13/12/20(Fri)23:47 No. 7879


I've seen lots of places where the line is drawn.

There's the feminist view: all men are rapists, so it's okay as long as there are no (human) males in there. I suspect this claim is actually created by straight men who only want to see women getting banged by dogs and horses because they're into humiliation.

There's the "passive only" stance. Basically, as long as the human is always the one getting penetrated or using their mouth/hand, it's okay. It boils down to: no men penetrating female or male animals (or, in theory, women using strap-ons or dildos, though I've never seen that). The reasoning behind this is that it's possible to hold down a dog and forcibly penetrate them, but it's not really possible to force a dog to mount you — he'll just jump off if he's not interested. However, this runs into trouble with "dildogging", which many claim is a form of abuse as it probably hurts the dog.

Ideally the best is disallowing anything where the animal is clearly in pain or struggling to escape, but that's not possible unless the moderator(s) personally check every video. The rule could be something like no non-sexual abuse: so no beating, forcing, whipping, snuff, that sort of deal. It would still rely on people to flag suspect videos for the moderators to check, and that still relies on people being civil and not being hypocritical fucktards about other people's fetishes.

You might be able to do something where animal/woman and animal/man is separated. In my experience, it's usually the people who like the former and don't like the latter who start shit. Considering the oversaturation with animal/woman in the genre to the exclusion of most everything else, you might be able to get away with making a couple stickies that the "gay" stuff has to stay in. Then the whiny straight men can just hide that thread and go about their business.

(Oh, and thanks for bringing back /sm, by the way. Forgive me for not trusting the word of politicians at face-value. You've gained my respect, for what it's worth.)

Anonymous 13/12/21(Sat)00:53 No. 7880

>There's the "passive only" stance. Basically, as long as the human is always the one getting penetrated or using their mouth/hand, it's okay. It boils down to: no men penetrating female or male animals (or, in theory, women using strap-ons or dildos, though I've never seen that). The reasoning behind this is that it's possible to hold down a dog and forcibly penetrate them, but it's not really possible to force a dog to mount you — he'll just jump off if he's not interested. However, this runs into trouble with "dildogging", which many claim is a form of abuse as it probably hurts the dog.

I don't view /be/, not my thing, but this option sounds best. Alternatively you could say 'no humans allowed' and forbid anything with humans resulting in a board full of images of animals doing each other, getting themselves off and what-not. It's all shits and giggles to me.

Anonymous 13/12/21(Sat)05:26 No. 7881

That's going to exclude a large amount of what was actually posted on /be/
>Ideally the best is disallowing anything where the animal is clearly in pain or struggling to escape, but that's not possible unless the moderator(s) personally check every video. The rule could be something like no non-sexual abuse: so no beating, forcing, whipping, snuff, that sort of deal. It would still rely on people to flag suspect videos for the moderators to check, and that still relies on people being civil and not being hypocritical fucktards about other people's fetishes.

This seems like the most reasonable option

Anonymous 13/12/27(Fri)00:17 No. 7896


hero of the people

Anonymous 13/12/29(Sun)17:15 No. 7900

Bestiality's not my thing, but this mentality of penetration being bad bothers me. I'm going to agree with >>7881

Anonymous 13/12/30(Mon)15:34 No. 7903


Thank you!

Anonymous 14/01/11(Sat)01:50 No. 7920

Any luck with /be/?

Sazpaimon 14/01/12(Sun)21:32 No. 7923

We have an open call for moderators before we launch it. I don't know if we have any volunteers yet. If you want to moderate /be/, contact Found on IRC or express interest with your email here.

Anonymous 14/01/19(Sun)20:18 No. 7927

Da! Russian government ist genius!
...the kind of genius that works at the apple store for 8 bucks an hour.

+1 vote for the return of /be.
"the horror... the horror... the horror..."

Anonymous 14/01/20(Mon)18:27 No. 7928

I would moderate /be/ so hard if I could dammit. I'm here like every day but I only have mobile internet... That makes it impossible right?

Come on some guy, mod that shit

Anonymous 14/01/22(Wed)03:51 No. 7930

File 139035909314.gif - (71.95KB , 457x509 , thank_you_052.gif )

That's really good Sazpaimon the internet thanks you for trying


I never understood the point of having animal/women and animal/man, especially if you're trying to filter using penetration.

It should be more: male/human and female/human.

This always pissed me off people making huge zoo torrents sorted by "man" and "women", wtf are you doing mate I'm a zoo I'm looking for males and females here.

Anonymous 14/01/24(Fri)00:04 No. 7931

i've never been a mod, so i think i'll pass. i hope someone wil volunteer though.
i'm all yes for no animals penetrated by humans, if only that would help to revive /be/ faster...
are there any plans for mobile version of 7chan?

Anonymous 14/01/24(Fri)17:07 No. 7932

>are there any plans for mobile version of 7chan?

Plans and concept images yes. Implentation seems to be a long way off.
See: >>6427

Anonymous 14/01/25(Sat)04:22 No. 7933

File 139062012410.png - (97.33KB , 310x170 , skeleton-computer-user_jpg_350x250_crop_q85.png )

>last post from a few months ago
well, I guess I'll just wait here...

Anonymous 14/01/27(Mon)19:20 No. 7937


Btw how is a mod even supposed to check videos when people post them on those impossible to use filesharing sites. Even as a user it was just fuck it not worth the effort.

Anonymous ## Mod ## 14/01/29(Wed)13:41 No. 7940

We don't.
Hence >>/s/14
>Download at your own risk. 99% of these are spam.
If someone calls out a post as being a virus or something similar, I always delete it. Like you said, it's not worth the effort.

Matchbox Prince 14/01/30(Thu)04:07 No. 7941

>If someone calls out a post as being a virus or something similar, I always delete it.

In hindsight, that sounds like a very good way to let trolls — who don't like gay shit or don't like any of it — just run roughshod saying legit files have viruses when they don't. I understand that you can't check out only those that are flagged, because then the trolls will just continue doing so to waste your time, but still. There has to be a better way.

Anonymous ## Mod ## 14/01/30(Thu)04:25 No. 7942

That very rarely happens. The last time someone called out a virus was several months ago.
And as a way to prevent your post being deleted as spam, if I do fuck up, I encourage you to post some sort of message alongside it instead of just the download link. URL shorteners also throw up a big red flag for spam.

Anonymous 14/01/30(Thu)08:48 No. 7945

I can moderate /be/.

7 posts omitted. First 100 shown.

Delete post []
Report post