-  [WT]  [PS]  [Home] [Manage]

[Return]
Posting mode: Reply
  1.   (reply to 178)
  2. (for post and file deletion)
/civ/ - Civics
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG, WEBM
  • Maximum file size allowed is 1000 KB.
  • Images greater than 200x200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 935 unique user posts. View catalog

  • Blotter updated: 2018-08-24 Show/Hide Show All

We are in the process of fixing long-standing bugs with the thread reader. This will probably cause more bugs for a short period of time. Buckle up.

Movies & TV 24/7 via Channel7: Web Player, .m3u file. Music via Radio7: Web Player, .m3u file.

WebM is now available sitewide! Please check this thread for more info.

Anonymous 17/02/09(Thu)08:51 No. 178 ID: ddc2e8
178

File 148662669965.jpg - (132.89KB , 1024x512 , chandra-is-warren.jpg )

If she plays her cards right, and her party doesn't give in to its massive incompetence, I think she could ride this to a substantial challenge against Trump as the Democratic nominee in 2020.

I'm still going to vote third-party, because fuck this false dichotomy, but if there were any woman in the present political landscape capable of being a decent president, it's probably her.


>>
Anonymous 17/02/10(Fri)05:50 No. 179 ID: 5a53ee

Did you catch that the GOP tried to expunge the letter from Coretta from Senate history, only to have them turn around and try to expunge it again?

The GOP failed to place her letter into the official record of Sessions nomination to the federal bench. That they would then turn around and try to expunge it again using rule 19, a rule created using the existing framework of gag orders long used to prevent discussion of abolition in the senate.

So racists attempt to hide commentary on racist nominee's past from historical record, fail, then use rule steeped in racism to try to bury it again. But once men start reading the commentary they aren't silenced.

Tell us again about how you like the blacks. And respect women.

Also, calling another senator a liar or cancer on the senate floor is apparently not ascribing conduct or motive unworthy or unbecoming a senator. I suggest next time she point that McConnell has small hands and feet, which you may note does not fall under rule 19, since a senator is not required to have a large cock (or, in McConnell's case, come out of their shell).


>>
Anonymous 17/02/10(Fri)12:03 No. 180 ID: 72a922

>>179
>Tell us again about how you like the blacks. And respect women.
And then the GOP and Trump pretend they don't like each other, and their values are different, and that he's going to "change things" for the party.
>calling another senator a liar or cancer on the senate floor is apparently not ascribing conduct or motive unworthy or unbecoming a senator
If I were speaker of the house, I'd address every member as "Cancer from [State]". It would be true for the majority.





Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason