-  [WT]  [PS]  [Home] [Manage]

[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts]
Posting mode: Reply
  1.   (reply to 211)
  2. (for post and file deletion)
/civ/ - Civics
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG, WEBM
  • Maximum file size allowed is 1000 KB.
  • Images greater than 200x200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 453 unique user posts. View catalog

  • Blotter updated: 2011-01-12 Show/Hide Show All

There's a new /777/ up, it's /gardening/ Check it out. Suggest new /777/s here.

Movies & TV 24/7 via Channel7: Web Player, .m3u file. Music via Radio7: Web Player, .m3u file.

WebM is now available sitewide! Please check this thread for more info.

Anonymous 17/03/14(Tue)18:18 No. 211 ID: 8ac136

File 148951190926.jpg - (6.65KB , 198x233 , 200x400px-LL-45d6b6c3_image.jpg )

What if black lives don't matter?

4 posts omitted. Last 50 shown.
Anonymous 17/04/06(Thu)02:27 No. 232 ID: f01b0f

File 149143844082.jpg - (928.79KB , 840x3733 , 1484036057896.jpg )


Anonymous 17/04/06(Thu)03:58 No. 233 ID: a870df

File 149144392976.gif - (498.25KB , 500x255 , WhoNo.gif )

I'm pretty sure he was trying to be sarcastic... and failed miserably at it.

Probably his low IQ caused by racism.

Anonymous 17/04/06(Thu)04:13 No. 234 ID: f8bc7d

See, you can't even understand the struggle. You white cis straight male assholes.

Anonymous 17/04/06(Thu)22:13 No. 235 ID: 705039

File 149150960322.jpg - (14.01KB , 300x279 , TreChic.jpg )

One man understands struggle. A gay man hiding in the clothes of an autocrat.

Anonymous 17/04/23(Sun)19:57 No. 271 ID: 7861f9

>implying we even bought the whole ideal that they matter.

Anonymous 17/05/03(Wed)12:18 No. 278 ID: 2194e8

>implying anyone's life matters

Anonymous 17/05/06(Sat)12:40 No. 285 ID: d960d2

File 149406723230.jpg - (232.81KB , 1048x960 , 1491374186496.jpg )

Nobody gives you anything. You have to make it yourself
>You will never understand what it is like to face the barrel of a cops gun because you will be an upstanding member of society who will have complied with authorities well before the need to uses such force.
So, I should make them shoot me then complain that it was about my race?

Anonymous 17/05/07(Sun)14:12 No. 286 ID: 412291

>should make them shoot me then complain
You can't complain, you're dead.

Anonymous 17/08/04(Fri)09:32 No. 403 ID: 50f697

it's a joke, hun

Anonymous 17/08/14(Mon)03:28 No. 415 ID: 9fd7e5

Speaking of lives and their not mattering, there's been a bit of a ruckus in the same metropolitan area that's responsible for Chris-chan.

Anonymous 17/08/15(Tue)10:33 No. 416 ID: 6abe6b

File 150278600732.gif - (532.64KB , 400x328 , Just Look.gif )

Not surprising, Chris-chan is a human black hole of suck. Nothing can resist the pull towards his shit, not SJWs, not police helicopters, not even white supremacy itself.

They were doomed the moment they set foot in his state.

Anonymous 17/08/18(Fri)08:23 No. 417 ID: 6abe6b

File 150303743775.jpg - (252.69KB , 828x1280 , IsThisSoHardDon.jpg )

On the plus side, it has led to some good art.

Anonymous 18/01/10(Wed)22:37 No. 533 ID: 7b1e4d

Blacks are just worthless period. Look at their behavior patterns over the last 150 years. They act like sodomite apelings. Like they're still in the jungles of africa. They need to go back there.

Alternatively, I think that if Black lives mattered to blacks, they'd be out killing gang-bangers and drug runners instead of complaining about cops doing their jobs.

Anonymous 18/01/11(Thu)08:52 No. 534 ID: bcc440


Blacks also bitch and complain about racism when they truly are the most racist beings on the planet.

Anonymous 18/01/11(Thu)17:42 No. 535 ID: 03e1c9

>complaining about cops doing their jobs.

Black youth gets shot to death in front of 20 people.
Everyone knows the victim and the shooter.
Noone says a thing.

"Cops need to do their jobs! They don't care about black people!"

Anonymous 18/01/11(Thu)23:55 No. 536 ID: a870df

>Everyone knows the victim and the shooter. Noone says a thing.
To be completely fair, that's just southern culture.

Anonymous 18/01/13(Sat)08:41 No. 540 ID: bcc440

Nobody wants to be a snitch because snitches get stitches.

Anonymous 18/01/13(Sat)09:38 No. 542 ID: 1422fe

Gotta justify spending 50% of your income on firearms somehow.

Anonymous 18/01/17(Wed)12:12 No. 543 ID: bcc440

That is true. The only good nigger is a dead one.

Anonymous 18/02/24(Sat)11:03 No. 558 ID: 590f5b

File 151946663674.png - (91.75KB , 550x413 , Lots.png )

Funny how conservatives started to support gun legislation once the black panthers started hoarding guns.

Fucking pussies.

Anonymous 18/03/06(Tue)11:57 No. 563 ID: d0677f

Conservatives have never supported gun legislation.

Anonymous 18/03/08(Thu)01:25 No. 564 ID: a870df

The world existed before you were born, teenage girl.

Conservatives used to mock the radical faction that took over the NRA, for pushing the alternative view of the 2nd amendment that current pseudo-conservatives accept as fact.

Anonymous 18/03/19(Mon)17:00 No. 566 ID: 4089f6

What a party "used to do" is largely irrelevant to two parties that have no problem pandering and/or adapting to changing opinions.

Anonymous 18/03/20(Tue)11:03 No. 567 ID: 16e8f6

>no problem pandering and/or adapting to changing opinions
That's right, they'll say anything; be anything to stay in power.

Stop electing these shits who never keep their promises. If we want our government to respond to us, we have to demonstrate that it is responsible to us. Just once, we have to elect a president from another party. Any other party, to show the ruling parties they will be held accountable for their failure.

Anonymous 18/03/21(Wed)03:00 No. 569 ID: 4089f6

Yeah, that's easy enough to say. However, you've met those individuals that refuse to vote for a third party because it feels like a wasted vote when no one votes for third parties, though it wouldn't be a waste if enough people had the balls to vote for them. Give the world your best counterargument against that.

Anonymous 18/03/21(Wed)12:59 No. 571 ID: a77f7d

>Give the world your best counterargument against that.
Those people are stupid.

That is honestly the most profound argument I can make against it, and it depresses me to know it has no weight and will never convince them to stop voting against their own prosperity. I don't think argument is an effective method to encourage these people to act in their own interest; it's like telling a heroin addict that drugs are bad.

I'd rather there were an alternative to violence, eugenics, etc. to change the ratio of people who are willing to do something for themselves agaisnt people who think "woking the system from the inside" has ever worked, but talk isn't it.

What does one do when the vast majority lack the initiative to act in their own best interest? All I can do is keep spamming the truth here and every other part of the internet I visit: the two major parties only care about staying on top together; most any political gripe anyone alive has ever had was against the members or actions of one of those two parties if not both--the only way to be sure US democracy* works at all, at this point, is to elect a president from another party.

*I am painfully aware that the US is not a 'democracy', but a 'republic' that purports itself to be "democratic". This is yet another truth that is very difficult to communicate to other people in the United States because most of them lake the intellect to distinguish the two and/or slept through Civics and History in school.

Anonymous 18/03/22(Thu)22:34 No. 577 ID: c69d68

Goddamn autocorrect.

Anonymous 18/03/23(Fri)04:45 No. 578 ID: 195cb2

File 152177675669.gif - (875.90KB , 500x289 , Let Go.gif )

>agaisnt people who think "woking the system from the inside" has ever worked
Uh, but it clearly has, time and time again.

For a blindingly massive example just look at the Republican party.

The Republican party championed abolition to the point of civil war. It championed civil rights to the point of sending troops into schools and businesses.

The people they vehemently opposed just 10 to 20 years earlier were taken in with open arms. The focus of the entire party changed in less than a decade because it was taken over from within.

Similarly the Democratic party underwent a similar change a few years earlier. All those people who became Republicans? Who had spent their lives opposed everything the Republican Party stood for? They used to be Democrats. They were expunged en-masse by people working within that party.

If you're going to make this argument, you had better actually have some history on your side rather than bullshit that you tell yourself to not actually do anything useful with your time.

Find some candidate you believe in and join their campaign team. Come on you antisocial pricks, fucking go out there and find someone. Then you could actually have some real world experience to displace the bullshit you have now. A candidate doesn't limit you to D or R, it can be anyone.

I hate to be the bearer of bad news but there are political operatives spamming nonsense through social media and other online forums intending to keep people like you locked up and useless. Stop parroting their talking points and start physically doing something. Stop swiping right and left. Put down your cell phone. Leave your basements.

Anonymous 18/03/24(Sat)17:06 No. 579 ID: dc4125

>it clearly has
>The focus of the entire party changed in less than a decade because it was taken over from within
>They were expunged en-masse by people working within that party
Perhaps I should ammend my statment: it's never worked for any beneficial purpose. It only seems to work for people who want to shit things up. Although, no I haven't really looked it up; I only have my real-world experience to rely on--trying to work a bad system for a good purpose usually fails.

>Stop parroting their talking points and start physically doing something.
I'm happy you posted this, because it's true, and they've probably been here too. I am not one of them. It may not sound very original, but I don't think you'll find many people who share my point of view. I'm rather used to being the only person who ever says or thinks the things I say and think--been that way my whole life.

As for physically doing something, this is physically doing something. Just like those spambots attempt to sway public opinion with their spam, I'm trying to get a message out to an audience that might be receptive to it. Also, I vote.

As for making my ideal manifest; I often find myself thinking about the kinds of minor party coalitions you see in Europe--especially in Germany. There's no single third party in the United States with the financial resources or membership to compete against the two major parties. The most likely path to a real victory would be to have a "coalition primary" and pit the various third party candidates against each other as early as the major parties are having their primaries. The victor would become the coalition's candidate, with some agreement as to how that candidate will be able to represent the multifaceted values of the coalition in office (ie, as president they lead the nation according to the policies of their own party, but agree to give other--qualified--coalition candidates voices and roles in their administration).

The system itself is quite broken however, and stacked against the chances of any non-Republican or Democratic candidate from ever winning. Without proportional representation in most state's electoral colleges, the popular vote is nigh on meaningless. I could imagine a third-party candidate becoming popular enough to win a majority of the popular vote nationwide, and in a majority of states, but if they don't get the majority in a few specific states they still lose.

Anonymous 18/03/25(Sun)13:06 No. 580 ID: 9d4072

File 152197599823.png - (150.46KB , 228x323 , Hitting Kids Works Wonders.png )

The old "my point was exposed as bullshit so I'm going to change my point" play. (yawn)

Anonymous 18/03/26(Mon)12:58 No. 583 ID: 111421

I was trying to offer a concession to your counterpoint. If you'd rather I stick hard and fast to mine, I can do that too: Trying to work the system from the inside doesn't work. Expoiting a bad system to make something worse does, but trying to change a bad system into a good one without resorting to abolishing the original system never has.

Anonymous 18/03/26(Mon)22:26 No. 584 ID: a870df

>As for physically doing something, this is physically doing something.
No it is not.

Anonymous 18/04/04(Wed)16:33 No. 600 ID: 4089f6

How much coordinated shitposting is necessary before it reaches the level of "doing something?" If scandals about Russians and Cambridge Analytica are to be believed, there is a level where people can be influenced by what's posted online, but one person armed with nothing more than an opinion on a chan is a slacktivist. Where's the crossover point?

Anonymous 18/04/05(Thu)09:16 No. 601 ID: 9c21c5

>Where's the crossover point?
Legitimate question is legitimate.

>one person armed with nothing more than an opinion on a chan
Let's call it the strategy of least effort. This is the absolute minimum of energy and capital one can expend on this type of propaganda campain. I'm sure there's a correlation between investment and success, but that's not to say with certainty that greater investment always leads to greater success. However unlikely, if other shitposters come to share my opinion, and propagate it through futher shitposts, the snowball effect could be as effective as any professional campaign.

Onward, for science!

Anonymous 18/04/06(Fri)02:53 No. 602 ID: a870df

>How much coordinated shitposting is necessary before it reaches the level of "doing something?"
It's an infinitely recursive value, you never can actually do anything without dragging your tubby butt out of a chair and going off and meeting like-minded people who will work with you on the goal you all share by repeatedly dragging their tubby butts out of chairs and actually doing things in that scary place you know as the real world.

Its kind of like what happens in Russia except there it ends up in executions or arrests if you oppose the regime or their flunkies.

Anonymous 18/04/29(Sun)23:36 No. 696 ID: ee9005

Blacks are fucking horrible terrible people. They ruin communities with their presence. They deserve to be oppressed. Racism is a moral imperative.

Anonymous 18/05/09(Wed)18:42 No. 751 ID: e1fd41

Trailer trash are fucking horrible terrible people. They ruin communities with their presence. They deserve to be oppressed.

Anonymous 18/05/24(Thu)22:04 No. 776 ID: 4089f6

That bit of satire doesn't hit as hard when eugenics proponents literally believe that about white trash as much as they do about black people.

Anonymous 18/06/16(Sat)20:21 No. 855 ID: c259d7

This is where most eugenics proponents are wrong. Improving humanity's gene pool isn't going to do away with poverty. Despite any improvment to our baseline physical or mental abilities, there will always be class and class conflict. We will divide ourselves, as we always have, along geographic and familial lines, into haves and have-nots.

Anonymous 18/06/19(Tue)03:39 No. 859 ID: a870df

Actually, no, most eugenics proponents don't believe that. They believe particular races are trash. If a Nazi came across a down on his luck Aryan in a trailer park they would still consider him a brother.

The problem is that races are complete and utter bullshit, quite literally created by eugenicists out of the world of ignorance that existed in the 1600s.

That's why eugenics fails. The world has moved on. Its time for eugenics to join the dustbin of history, like phrenology, chinese "medicine," physic surgery, antivaxxers - all the forms of quackery. Just let ignorance die the death it so richly deserves.

Anonymous 18/06/20(Wed)02:27 No. 860 ID: 1c8d23

I agree with everything you posted except about chinese medicine. True, a lot of herbal medicine is unregulated quackery, but the real, traditional chinese medicine does have some base in trial and error. Some of those remedies work, and plants are the basis for many modern medicines.

That said, I wouldn't recommend taking any chinese medicine or therapy from anyone who is not Chinese and in China.

Anonymous 18/06/22(Fri)07:55 No. 863 ID: d28870

>trial and error
That sounds nice until you realize that most of the animal parts they grind up now weren't known in China until fairly recently (by China's terms) so there's no trial and error involved with them.

This is because most of the animals they ground up throughout history (by China's terms) were hunted to extinction.

At those points they faced two choices: Start over from scratch with a new animal who may or may not offer the same benefits as the old animal or come up with a line of bullshit that the new animal parts offer the same benefits as the old animal parts with absolutely nothing to back it up.

Guess which choice they opted for?

Anonymous 18/06/24(Sun)14:45 No. 864 ID: 13039f

Some basis; not The Scientific Method.
You can criticize them for powderizing the bones of endagered species if you like, but that doesn't invalidate over 2,000 years, of developments in herbal medicine, acupuncture, chiropractice, massage, moxibustion, exercise, and dietary therapy.

Anonymous 18/06/27(Wed)23:08 No. 865 ID: a870df

So witchdoctory. Gotcha.

Anonymous 18/06/28(Thu)01:41 No. 866 ID: 3b06d7

To a degree, yes. That doesn't mean that much of it doesn't work.
It's not Voodoo; Chinese doctors don't pray to pagan gods (in china they don't pray to gods, period, because communism). The way you look down on it really is out of place; Chinese medicine isn't complete nonsense that can be dismissed the way you keep trying.

Many of those treatments are effective to treat illness that is treatable. The quackery side of it is when it's used to treat the untreatable. Yeah, there are people who would swear by Chinese remedies that cure cancer, etc. and that's just stupid, but it doesn't invalidate treatments that can help you get over a cold, a flu, jaundice, etc.

Anonymous 18/06/28(Thu)20:05 No. 867 ID: 0f52f2

The bits of most traditional pre-scientific medicine systems that actually happen to work are just called medicine.

Anonymous 18/06/29(Fri)10:12 No. 868 ID: d28870

And the bits that don't are called quackery.

Apparently some people have trouble with quackery being called quackery because zomg ancient mysticism and the west is always wrong about everything.

Anonymous 18/06/30(Sat)06:53 No. 870 ID: a4b1de

>zomg ancient mysticism and the west is always wrong about everything
Are you talking about me? For defending a system of medical treatment that by and large works and has been for thousands of years? If you were paying any fucking attention, you may have noticed that I am not the opposition you are looking for:
>True, a lot of herbal medicine is unregulated quackery
>Some basis; not The Scientific Method.
>To a degree, yes.

My point is that much of it does actually work, not all of it, and yes there is some quackery. Mysticism isn't medicine, medicine is medicine. Chinese medicine is mostly medicine, but sure, go right ahead and keep charging at this windmill; I don't mind.

Anonymous 18/06/30(Sat)17:23 No. 871 ID: 5bd7ab

>Chinese medicine is mostly medicine
And that's where we differ. Chinese medicine is mostly quackery.

Some of it is helpful, some of it is hurtful, but most of it is neither helpful nor hurtful. People take placebos and cure diseases at the same rate as the last group, making it as helpful as imbibing a sugar pill. Except nobody hunted animals to extinction to make a sugar pills.

Next time please leave your white guilt at the door.

Anonymous 18/07/01(Sun)08:34 No. 874 ID: 5fc4cd

>Some of it is helpful
I'm content to leave it at this.


Delete post []
Report post