-  [WT]  [PS]  [Home] [Manage]

[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts] [First 100 posts]
Posting mode: Reply
  1.   (reply to 608)
  2. (for post and file deletion)
/civ/ - Civics
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG, WEBM
  • Maximum file size allowed is 1000 KB.
  • Images greater than 200x200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 448 unique user posts. View catalog

  • Blotter updated: 2011-01-12 Show/Hide Show All

There's a new /777/ up, it's /gardening/ Check it out. Suggest new /777/s here.

Movies & TV 24/7 via Channel7: Web Player, .m3u file. Music via Radio7: Web Player, .m3u file.

WebM is now available sitewide! Please check this thread for more info.

Anonymous 18/04/09(Mon)01:54 No. 608 ID: 79b576
608

File 152323166831.jpg - (92.72KB , 600x343 , P1370539-900x601_1.jpg )

I support the second amendment rights of all US citizens, and this is somehow unpopular.


123 posts omitted. Last 50 shown.
>>
Anonymous 18/05/25(Fri)07:19 No. 780 ID: e4f5db
780

File 152722556384.png - (76.56KB , 1280x832 , Preventable_causes_of_death_svg.png )

>>779
>all time high
They murder us, poison us, and fatten us up for the feast and you still take their side.


>>
Anonymous 18/05/25(Fri)08:06 No. 781 ID: ead321
781

File 152722838686.gif - (11.74KB , 432x456 , GUNSTAT.gif )

>>780
It doesn't help that you spend your time lying through your teeth like you think nobody is smart enough to see through your bullshit.


>>
Anonymous 18/05/25(Fri)09:19 No. 782 ID: dcc3b0

>>780
>>781
>two uncited random charts
>first chart from who knows what year shows 3 choice driven lifestyles as the top causes of death

Last time I checked your senator and district rep weren't jamming burgers and cigarettes in your mouth...

>second chart has no information of what it's measuring

If it's firearms deaths, it's totally inaccurate.

Here's some actual figures regarding life expectancy from reputable sources and not twitter.

Average life expectancy 1980: 70 and 77 for males and females, respectively
http://www.demog.berkeley.edu/~andrew/1918/figure2.html

Average of both sexes as of this year is 78.
http://fortune.com/2018/02/09/us-life-expectancy-dropped-again/

As for your bullshit firearms chart, I don't think countries like Mexico, where thousands are murdered by the cartels and state alike every year, keep accurate records.
In fact, I'd say few "shit hole" countries do.

The truth is things are fine in the US and you want something to crusade against because your life lacks meaning.

Move to another country if things are so terrible in the US, douche bag, then if you can, stop complaining about nothing.


>>
Anonymous 18/05/26(Sat)15:01 No. 788 ID: ead321
788

File 152733967710.gif - (3.29KB , 533x183 , FOR114.gif )

>>782
>Last time I checked your senator and district rep weren't jamming burgers and cigarettes in your mouth
They weren't jamming cocks in your mouth yet you keep shoving them in there.

Stop molesting kids man, it's not cool.

>If it's firearms deaths, it's totally inaccurate.
Actually it is firearm deaths, and it's totally accurate.

Also, how the fuck don't you know how to reverse image search in 2018. Don't make me tell the nursing home to curtail your internet privileges.


>>
Anonymous 18/05/27(Sun)02:35 No. 790 ID: cb1003

>>788
>They weren't jamming cocks in your mouth yet you keep shoving them in there.

Don't confuse Canada with the US, Cucknadien.

>Actually it is firearm deaths, and it's totally accurate.
>Also, how the fuck don't you know how to reverse image search in 2018

I don't need to reverse image search to know you get all your info and "stats" from twitter. You're clearly retarded.


>>
Anonymous 18/05/27(Sun)10:53 No. 791 ID: b5f80f

>>790
>faults other people for not providing sources
>refuses to do any of his own research


>>
Anonymous 18/05/28(Mon)03:57 No. 795 ID: aee119

>>791
I've included sources in every post that has stated a fact, but if you insist.

This >>781 is from the early 90s and conducted by the medical community.

This >>788 is from 1996 and conducted by the Center for Disease Control, ironically the same year they had their funding pulled for the politically charged bias of their studies uncovered by another medical professional.
http://rkba.org/research/suter/med-lit.html

Also, dickhead forgot to mention it's only for those 15 and under, not all firearm related deaths.

Now aside from the obvious question of why the fuck are medical doctors performing sociological studies, there's the question of why that graph, echoed all over twitter and reddit, specifically stops at age 15 and doesn't include 16 and 17 year olds.

Could it be because the results wouldn't come to the drastic conclusions the researchers wanted?


>>
Anonymous 18/05/31(Thu)20:46 No. 804 ID: ead321
804

File 152779240979.png - (81.18KB , 550x519 , Its All Your Fault.png )

>>795
>ironically the same year they had their funding pulled for the politically charged bias of their studies
Yeah, if you're going to choose a source, try choosing a source that isn't someone's blog of half-insane rantings and conspiracy theories wrapped up in an early 90s web design. But of course you can't do that, because it's all some vast conspiracy of fact-based sourcing that doesn't fit your preconceived narrative of events.

Here's something for you to chew on then run out and buy another gun over:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1447376/
>In attacking science, vested interests may also hide their identities by masquerading as grassroots coalitions or by affiliating themselves with neutral organizations
>Vested interests have also found ways to infiltrate professional organizations under the guise of academic neutrality.
>In their efforts to squelch unwanted scientific findings, vested interests have also been known to harass investigators, federal agencies, and even the scientific and policy-making processes themselves.
Good job being an unpaid spokesperson for people you don't even know you're working on their behalf of you complete fucking twat.

So let's sum up:
>Demands fact-based research from every poster
>Supports organizations who have spent 30+ years working to block fact-based research from occurring
>Is shocked, shocked, that sources are hard to come by that aren't some random guy's clearly biased blog where facts get placed in a jar and waved in the general direction of his website
>Instead of blaming his organizations for the lack of information, blames posters because they're the real problem
That about sum it up there brainiac?

I do find it interesting that every time you post you have a different ID though. Kind of fits the narrative that you're sitting on some compound in Montana.


>>
Anonymous 18/06/01(Fri)00:53 No. 805 ID: 1908a9

>>748
The problem with this graphic is that it doesnt even try to provide statistics on usage of pot by race. It makes the assumption that whites, blacks, and latinos all have the same number of pot smokers per racial population, and that those population are evenly distributed across the entire location. You can't reasonably extrapolate racial bias from a univariable analysis.


>>
Anonymous 18/06/01(Fri)06:46 No. 806 ID: 58ff14

>>804
>even when the data are inadequate

Stopped reading there.

>random guy's clearly biased blog

If by that, you mean "Journal Of The Medical Association Of Georgia". Then, yes.

Here's a wild idea, how about you don't buy any guns and others will buy them if they want?

Btw, nazis didn't let people complain and protest constantly.
They murdered them.


>>
Anonymous 18/06/01(Fri)12:53 No. 808 ID: ead321
808

File 152785041636.jpg - (62.48KB , 599x612 , FETS.jpg )

>>806
>Stopped reading there
Now you know how the rest of us feel every time we see something from the delusional world you inhabit.

So let's sum up:
>Demands fact-based research from every poster
>Supports organizations who have spent 30+ years working to block fact-based research from occurring
>Is shocked, shocked, that sources are hard to come by that aren't some random guy's clearly biased blog where facts get placed in a jar and waved in the general direction of his website
>Instead of blaming his organizations for the lack of information, blames posters because they're the real problem

>Journal Of The Medical Association Of Georgia
No, I mean
>Doctors for Integrity in Research & Public Policy
They're a group the NRA astroturfed to push their agenda once they realized the truth of the extreme right wing fallacies they had been pushing since the last 70s were about to be exposed as lies told by lying liars and the dimwitted morons who are too scared to think for themselves.

>Here's a wild idea, how about you don't buy any guns and others will buy them if they want?
That's nice and all, but then of course you don't bother to properly secure your guns, go off your rails and start shooting innocent people because pizzagate or some other ridiculous conspiracy, or any other number of equally common events that occur every fucking day.

How about this. You want to buy guns? Take out an insurance policy to cover any and all damages committed by anyone who "somehow" manages to gain access to your guns, forcing you to properly secure your firearms. You know, like that guy from two states over who is willing to pay you top top top top dollar for your gun if you sell it to him the instant he drives over so he can turn around and murder his girlfriend/family/some guy on the internet who pointed out his lack of a scrotum. Or your underage nephew Herbert who opened your top dresser drawer one afternoon while looking for some clean underwear, because you've fucked him in the ass so much hes developed incontinence. You know, those things that never happen to someone who doesn't have a firearm in the house, which is why you need to carry insurance. Of course you will have to declare to the insurance company what guns you have and what conditions you store them in and so on and so forth so that the policy can be adequately drafted to cover your exact shithole and the squalid conditions you live in.

Or you can just stop living in fear. It's really not that hard. The first step is admitting you have a problem. The second step is counseling, either in a group or one-on-one. Eventually you'll find your death woobies don't hold any comfort for you anymore. As an added bonus, you can ship them off to your friends in Russia!


>>
Anonymous 18/06/01(Fri)13:02 No. 810 ID: ead321
810

File 15278509597.jpg - (47.04KB , 500x315 , Bottled Water For Some.jpg )

>>805
>It makes the assumption that whites, blacks, and latinos all have the same number of pot smokers per racial population
You must not get out much. Pot smokers come from all walks of life, they come in all skin shades. All socioeconomic groups.

You, my uptight friend, probably work alongside a few (assuming you're not a trust fund baby who lives in his parents basement). They aren't going to tell you because they know you'll narc them out at the first opportunity, which will end with them getting shot by a trigger happy roid raging rookie intent on getting his first narco conviction.


>>
Anonymous 18/06/01(Fri)13:50 No. 811 ID: 72f69e

>>808
>last 70s

Uhm, what?

>ridiculous conspiracy

lol

>Take out an insurance policy

Eh, luckily the law doesn't listen to morons. Maybe stay off twitter. It's making you retarded.

>Or you can just stop living in fear.

It sounds like you're the one who's scared. Though, odds are you'll never get shot unless you walk around with that tough guy internet persona on you.
They do sell bulletproof vests.


>>
Anonymous 18/06/02(Sat)12:30 No. 813 ID: ead321
813

File 152793543116.jpg - (51.69KB , 640x686 , Offensive offenders being offensive.jpg )

>>811
>Uhm, what?
One misspelled word and you've lost the ability to use reading comprehension to determine the word that was supposed to be in the sentence?

So if I poke around NRA-funded websites long enough will I stumble across the threads you're using to crowdsource your replies from? Or do I need to get one of my Russian coworkers involved in the search?

>Eh, luckily the law doesn't listen to morons.
Sure it does. It listens to you. So long as you keep bleating out the NRA party line.

>It sounds like you're the one who's scared
I'm not the one who's so frightened of schoolchildren that I need to run out and purchase firearms and keep one under every pillow in my home.

Don't look now, but there's a bunch of girl scouts knocking on the door of your bunker. Remember, they don't know its so poorly constructed that knocking could lead to its complete collapse. They're not actually being threatening. You don't have to kill again.


>>
Anonymous 18/06/03(Sun)03:07 No. 815 ID: 7d02f5

>>813
>So if I poke around NRA-funded websites long enough will I stumble across the threads you're using to crowdsource your replies from? Or do I need to get one of my Russian coworkers involved in the search?

Well, anybody who disagrees with your opinions on the subject is obviously an NRA member, so you'll probably want to get Ivan involved since that's half the US.

>So long as you keep bleating out the NRA party line.

People! Keep having options!

>They're not actually being threatening.

Idk. I think I saw the fat one's hand twitch.

I love how "Thomas Violence" doesn't know what an automatic weapon is.


>>
Anonymous 18/06/03(Sun)11:10 No. 816 ID: 2f4cff

>>815
>Attempting to discredit a gun control advocate for their lack of familiarity with guns
No, you may not sir. The technical details don't change the reality of the situation: lots of kids being killed by guns. True, they were semi-automatic weapons, but that obviously does not matter. Semi-autos turn your teenage angst into body counts well enough.

We have all heard enough from you. It is time for you to change your way of thinking or blast that useless brain out of your skull. Every day you live to promote your point of view, innocent people are being killed by your beloved guns.

The United States is a democracy; you could vote for politicians who are willing to stand up for human life, but you chose to vote for politicians who spend every day of their careers on their knees fellating gun manufacturers for nickels. You are responsible for those deaths, personally responsible. You could have done something to help, but you chose to let more people be killed.

Feel that weight, get a gun, and kill yourself--or wake the fuck up and stop parroting the NRA agendas that are turning our streets and our schools into warzones.


>>
Anonymous 18/06/03(Sun)16:30 No. 818 ID: cf5121

>>816
>that obviously does not matter

Yeah, it does. People who are unfamiliar with a subject should not be dictating policy on it. Also, who gives a shit what Aussies think.

>It is time for you to change your way of thinking or blast that useless brain out of your skull
>innocent people
>the children
>get a gun and kill yourself

You can stop acting like you care about safety and people because you're obviously a bastard.

>The United States is a democracy

It's a republic.


>>
Anonymous 18/06/04(Mon)00:15 No. 819 ID: ead321
819

File 15280641194.jpg - (27.76KB , 550x288 , yourwetdream.jpg )

>>818
>People who are unfamiliar with a subject should not be dictating policy on it.
Come down off your fucking high horse you ridiculously smug twat. It's not rocket science or high energy physics its just firearms. Almost everyone born since the 1700s has an understanding of how firearms work and how to use them. You are not smart because you know how to use a gun - everyone knows how to use a gun. That's why children keep getting murdered by other children in school. Because it doesn't take a law degree to understand guns.

Nobody gives a shit about the extremely cryptic ways you like to discuss types of guns, because they're inconsequential to the real world topic of guns. That you think they matter is evidence of just how far down the NRA rabbit hole you've gone.

>You can stop acting like you care about safety and people because you're obviously a bastard
Actually no we actually do care about safety and people, which is why we want a sociopath like you to get it over with and kill yourself already. Given your unhealthy fixation on firearms and inability to think for yourself this is only going to end one of two ways - either you intentionally murder another person or you unintentionally murder another person, after which the result is the same - you eat your gun. We want to skip the murder part, since we actually care about other people, and encourage you get on with the inevitable result. It's better for the rest of us, its better for the people you murder, and, really, its better for you.

>It's a republic
Yeah, we've all heard you recite the pledge of allegiance before, but did you know the republic wasn't included in the original versions of the pledge because nobody got a hard-on about the differences between a representative democracy and a direct democracy until some stupid fucking twat like you came along and forced it to be changed and forced children to recite it until twats like yourself were raised thinking that's just how it always was and nobody but you is capable of remembering the pledge of allegiance. You idiotic autistic anal douchebag.


>>
Anonymous 18/06/04(Mon)03:44 No. 820 ID: d68a6d

>>819
>everyone knows how to use a gun.

You've never used a gun before.

>Actually no we actually do care about safety and people

Suuuuuuuure you do.

>nobody but you is capable of remembering the pledge of allegiance

That's sad.


>>
Anonymous 18/06/04(Mon)18:38 No. 821 ID: 8ab00e

>>820
>You've never used a gun before.
I can't speak for >>819, but I have. I was trained on rifles in the Boy Scouts and learned handguns from a friend and an uncle around age 12. Most of that training: how to handle the gun when not firing it, how to shoot more accurately. An ape could pick one up and fire it.

>Suuuuuuuure you do.
Well, not your safety in particular, but wouldn't you like to have the peace of mind to know that no one is ever going to shoot you? You may find this hard to belive, but there are countries out there where people aren't worried about being shot by criminals, psychopaths, or police--even though people still have their hunting rifles and shotguns or whatever. The US is practially a war zone compared to most first-world countries.

>That's sad.
No, clinging to propaganda as if it were for your benefit is sad.

>>818
>It's a republic.
It's a disaster. It's also a de facto corpoate oligarchy. Get the lobbyists out of DC, then we can have something like a representational democracy.


>>
Anonymous 18/06/05(Tue)00:49 No. 822 ID: a870df

>>821
>It's a disaster. It's also a de facto corpoate oligarchy. Get the lobbyists out of DC, then we can have something like a representational democracy.
Outlawing Citizens United would be a good first step, in which the conservative majority decided that money = speech and corporations = people. It's not enough but it'd a good first step, because without getting rid of CU the cockroaches are just going to keep coming back.


>>
Anonymous 18/06/06(Wed)01:08 No. 823 ID: 01d998

>>821
>An ape could pick one up and fire it.

Yeah. Probably shoot his own dick off.

>wouldn't you like to have the peace of mind to know that no one is ever going to shoot you?

I have grown up and lived most my life in one the most "dangerous" cities in the US. I take public transit and walk around at all times of the day and night.

Not only have I never been afraid for my life, but also have yet to witness a shooting.

>You may find this hard to belive, but there are countries out there where people aren't worried about being shot by criminals, psychopaths, or police

If you're referring to countries in the EU, they probably should worry more before they get stabbed or acid in the face or run over by a truck.

>No, clinging to propaganda as if it were for your benefit is sad.

And that is one of the many reasons no one with any sense will ever take you or your bullshit agenda seriously.

>It's a disaster.

Maybe read less opinion based online articles and visit the US once in awhile, then you might see that you're an idiot.


>>
Anonymous 18/06/06(Wed)21:34 No. 824 ID: ead321
824

File 152831366894.jpg - (160.37KB , 1080x1634 , Your Kind.jpg )

>>823
>Not only have I never been afraid for my life, but also have yet to witness a shooting
And yet you cling to guns for protection.

Its ironic that the lower the crime rate falls the more strident the calls for 2nd amendment absolutism have become.

Also
>Anyone who disagrees with me must not live in the US
Get an original thought inside your head for once, stop letting Russia tell you how to think.


>>
Anonymous 18/06/06(Wed)23:03 No. 825 ID: a870df

>>823
>Yeah. Probably shoot his own dick off.
Here's a word for you to learn.
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/bikeshedding

It perfectly encapsulates the entirety of your life experience.


>>
Anonymous 18/06/07(Thu)02:10 No. 826 ID: d124bc

>>823
>Yeah. Probably shoot his own dick off.
I didn't say safely; which was the point, that I will now explicitly explain to you as you obvioulsy cannot make deductions on your own: children kill people, and themselves, with guns because no one needs any training to fire one--they need training to do it properly, and every gun within reach of the hands of a person without that training is a danger to themselves and society.

Anything else you should already know that I could teach you for the upteenth time again?

>Not only have I never been afraid for my life, but also have yet to witness a shooting.
>I take public transit and walk around at all times of the day and night.
Why do you point this out then? Is it dangerous to take public transit and walk around day or night in your area? You wouldn't mention it if you didn't think so. You think so. You live in a society where being in public is presumed to be dangerous. You are afraid for your life; you probably always have been. You're so accustomed to it that you don't even notice.

>they probably should worry more before they get stabbed or acid in the face or run over by a truck.
That's some nice whataboutism you've got there. Any other fallacies you'd like to uselessly spew out while you're at it? As if there are not knives, acid, and trucks everywhere on the damn planet...

>visit the US once in awhile
Ok, I know there's Scouting International, but how many countries' Boy Scouts do you imagine offering rifle training to 12-year-olds?

>>822
>Outlawing Citizens United
Yes, that would be a good start.


>>
Anonymous 18/06/07(Thu)20:14 No. 828 ID: 1b48d1

>>826
>Anything else you should already know that I could teach you for the upteenth time again?

Yeah, why is this debate online solely about guns?

Why has the board of education not recommended common sense safety measures yet while everyone politicizes this?

Such as:
Inside locks on external school doors during class
Direct alarms to the police department, like fire alarms except for shootings, for each school
Locks on classroom doors
Having a neighborhood cop patrol the area, specifically for this kind of incident.
Metal detectors
Having a plan in place.

There doesn't even have to be any guns involved.

>Is it dangerous to take public transit and walk around day or night in your area? You wouldn't mention it if you didn't think so. You think so.

Everyone thinks so. It's the inner-city of Chicago.

>As if there are not knives, acid, and trucks everywhere on the damn planet...

That's kind of the point. That these attacks are unavoidable from a standpoint of controlling the weapons.

Prohibition has never worked here and nobody is going to pay for the cost of background checks and maintaining the largest and most disorganized database of random federal and state felons, anyone who's ever been committed to either a private or public hospital, and anyone declared unfit by a private practitioner.
That's just baseline, too. It doesn't include maintenance, HIPPA compliance, false positives, errors, hardware, accessibility, fees, updates, and a million more issues.
All for a sociological experiment that has no basis in a country like ours.

Might want to try another route than changing a constitutional amendment, if your goal really is to keep people safe.


>>
Anonymous 18/06/08(Fri)05:20 No. 829 ID: 1882fb

>>828
>There doesn't even have to be any guns involved
This is actually a great idea. Why isn't something like this getting done? Probably because no federal or state education budget will ever afford it to them and also because the NRA won't allow any legislation that doesn't make profit for their gun-manufacturing overlords to pass.

>Everyone thinks so.
I know it's really hard for you to hear me that deep in this shit, but people don't have to live that way. Lots of people around the world don't.

>That these attacks are unavoidable from a standpoint of controlling the weapons
So don't even bother trying? That's not going to work either. The point of gun regulation is to reduce the number of people murdered, not do away with violence itself. How many times in this thread have we been over this? There will always been people who are angry, crazy, and stupid; some of them will kill other people and possibly themselves; they don't need guns to do it--but without guns the number of peole killed will be less.

>Prohibition
>changing a constitutional amendment
FOR THE LAST FUCKING TIME: NO ONE IS TALKING ABOUT THAT BUT YOU.

THE FIRST REPLY TO THIS THREAD: >>609
>No reasonable person wants to take it away from you

How many times can we have the same exchange? How many times? How many god damn times?


>>
Anonymous 18/06/08(Fri)07:38 No. 830 ID: 60ac52

>>829
>How many times can we have the same exchange? How many times? How many god damn times?

Until you come up with an idea for gun control that isn't retarded.

Not retarded meaning:
1. Doesn't require mass amounts of people to alter their lives to accommodate it.
2. Doesn't cost an obscene amount of money or require a national database
3. Has proven, effective results in a country like the United States


>>
Anonymous 18/06/09(Sat)01:04 No. 832 ID: a870df

>>830
>like the United States
That would be nice if you would accept places like Australia as being similar to the United States.

But no, you don't. You insist that only the United States is like the United States. And then, in a paradoxical twist of logic that strains incredulity, you demand that we have proof that a particular method works in the United States even though you support organizations like the NRA which actively prevent any and all evidence-based testing on the smallest of possible scales. That means there is no way of implementing the scheme you demand we implement.

At this point I'm fairly certain you're either a troll or a complete moron. Possibly both, but the more you write the more it's coming down on the latter.


>>
Anonymous 18/06/09(Sat)12:26 No. 833 ID: b0d4fc

>>832
>That would be nice if you would accept places like Australia as being similar to the United States.

Ahahahahahaha no

>you support organizations like the NRA

You keep saying that, but since I'm not an NRA member and pay nothing to them, I'd say they're supporting me at this point.


>>
Anonymous 18/06/09(Sat)14:09 No. 834 ID: 5cd1d7

>>833
>I'd say they're supporting me at this point.
I wouldn't put it past them to hire a few trolls to spread their ideology on the Internet. This is a post-truth world, and whether we like it or not 7chan is a social media platform. The Russians' postbots stopped by to spread alt-rightism in 2016. This kind of propaganda campaign is becoming the norm.


>>
Anonymous 18/06/09(Sat)22:48 No. 835 ID: 2dac6b

>>834
>I wouldn't put it past them to hire a few trolls to spread their ideology on the Internet.

They don't need to.


>>
Anonymous 18/06/10(Sun)01:57 No. 837 ID: 822fd0

>>835
That doesn't mean they wouldn't, and as this thread clearly demonstrates there are still some audiences not yet receptive to the inane bullshit that is their message.


>>
Anonymous 18/06/10(Sun)13:56 No. 838 ID: 10a142

So let's sum up.

OP lives in Chicago. He gets taunted by his extremist right wing online peers about not being able to buy a gun. So he uses this thread to vent his irrational emotional frustration about not being able to be an equal member of the group of deplorables he calls friend.

I suggest OP move across the border to Gary, Indiana. No gun laws there and because of that it's an absolute paradise.


>>
Anonymous 18/06/10(Sun)15:46 No. 839 ID: 23171c

>>838
>extremist right wing online peers

Lol you guys just can't accept someone with different views, can you?
It's really intolerant and pathetic.

So, let's sum up. You're an idiot.

You can buy guns in Chicago.


>>
Anonymous 18/06/11(Mon)10:48 No. 840 ID: 10a142

>>839
>Lol you guys just can't accept someone with different views, can you?
Different views, sure.

Your views aren't different. They're asinine. That's why you get mocked.

Maybe some day you'll grow up and find a pair of balls someone's wife discarded. Until then you'll just keep parroting the same old tired debunked bullshit because you're too afraid to think for yourself.


>>
Anonymous 18/06/11(Mon)18:46 No. 841 ID: e41b6d

>>840
>debunked

Where?

>think for yourself

I am. Can you say the same?


>>
Anonymous 18/06/12(Tue)18:22 No. 844 ID: 9c72ea

>>841
Oh the miracle of the Internet: no argument ever need be lost.

No matter how many times you are proven wrong or by how many different people or in however many different ways, you can just pick right up where you left off and keep going on.

Ammosexuality isn't going to win here; accept it and find something better to do with your time--like swallowing a .45 GAP.


>>
Anonymous 18/06/13(Wed)06:32 No. 845 ID: 70c286

>>844
>proven

Unfortunately, your sad feelings aren't proof of anything.


>>
Anonymous 18/06/14(Thu)00:40 No. 846 ID: a870df

>>845
Your constant IP changes are proof that you're a paranoid android.


>>
Anonymous 18/06/14(Thu)08:18 No. 848 ID: 89d2b1
848

File 152895711284.jpg - (39.03KB , 492x311 , Before And After.jpg )

>833
>Ahahahahahaha no
I can't help but go back to this.

You demand that any solution implemented be first proven as being workable in the United States.

You further demand that no solutions be implemented here unless they meet your first demand.

And finally you don't think that any country is similar enough to the United States to qualify as an example.

In other words, based on your logic, there is no solution capable of meeting your approval.

Not even your NRA wet dream solutions meet your demands so I really don't understand why the fuck you're even trying to propose them.

Which is why we all know you're getting money from the NRA, you disingenuous idiotic manchild who only graduated from K12 by having daddy bribe his teachers.


>>
Anonymous 18/06/14(Thu)17:53 No. 850 ID: 9fbf2d

>>848
>And finally you don't think that any country is similar enough to the United States to qualify as an example.

I didn't say that. I said Australia is nothing like the United States.
1. It's an island with no inland civilization or neighboring countries.
2. It's a democratic constitutional monarchy that still recognizes the Queen of England as the Queen of Australia.
3. A million other differences.

Two countries off the top of my head that more closely resemble the US are Brazil and RSA.
How's gun control going there?

>Not even your NRA wet dream solutions meet your demands so I really don't understand why the fuck you're even trying to propose them.
>Which is why we all know you're getting money from the NRA

You must be special


>>
Anonymous 18/06/14(Thu)20:21 No. 851 ID: a870df
851

File 152900046463.jpg - (54.31KB , 562x437 , No.jpg )

>>850
>Two countries off the top of my head that more closely resemble the US are Brazil and RSA.
A stupid statement demands a stupid meme.


>>
Anonymous 18/06/14(Thu)21:31 No. 853 ID: f871fd

>>851
I said more closely resembles the US, not identical.

Ethnically diverse, urban and rural, independent republics, mainland countries with large populations and economies.

If you think Australia is like the US, you're retarded.


>>
Anonymous 18/06/15(Fri)04:49 No. 854 ID: 94acd6
854

File 152903094939.jpg - (35.43KB , 240x160 , op winning an argument.jpg )

>>850
>special
Says the guy with the argumentative skills of a four year old.

This is part of a series on covering your ears, closing your eyes, and screaming: >>684 >>709


>>
Anonymous 18/06/17(Sun)12:42 No. 856 ID: 47101f

>>854
If that were the case, I'd just be typing SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED over and over again.

You're welcome.


>>
Anonymous 18/06/17(Sun)17:23 No. 857 ID: c259d7

>>856
That's not what you've been doing through this entire thread?


>>
Anonymous 18/06/18(Mon)16:18 No. 858 ID: 91e960

>>857
He's special


>>
Anonymous 18/06/20(Wed)14:18 No. 861 ID: 236f1f

>>857
Shall not!
>>858
You're a literal retard.


>>
Anonymous 18/06/21(Thu)01:33 No. 862 ID: a870df

>>857
Its not his fault. If he deviates from his script he won't get paid.



[Return]


Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason