>>
While I would agree that all of these fine aspects could affect my choice, I cannot express my taste so specifically. I enjoy the uniqueness of women - their little quirks and perks that make them who they are. While commonly these would be psychological traits, sometimes I can see them defining some of the physical characteristics, such as the shape and length of their hair, the tone of their voice and the way their eyes move.
Most of these features are noticed in the movements and shape of the face, so I believe that that is my preferred visual aspect in a woman. Other than that, I appreciate the popular thought - elegant movements, a lithe stature, but not overly built, larger breasts than the body structure usually allows and elegant legs. However, if someone has a uniquely pleasant characteristic so specific that it requires some of the above not to be applicable, it would only further stir my curiosity. For example, elegant clumsiness (the way a person moves and feels instead of their weight, this does not necessarily include the shape of the body) instead of elegance, smaller breasts and elegance instead of larger ones without it. Even though the skin tone does not really matter, sometimes, for some reason, I adore pale women more than others.
On the other hand, I dislike all unnecessary artificial enhancements and feel that, while they might add to the beauty of a woman, they also subtract from her character.
Having said all that, I am still mostly attracted to the inner beauty in a woman - playfulness, curiosity, intelligence and an open mind are what I always hope to see in a woman.
I hope I have not affected this discussion in a negative way through my poor choice of words.