-  [WT]  [PS]  [Home] [Manage]

[Return]
Posting mode: Reply
  1.   (reply to 2428)
  2. (for post and file deletion)
/class/ - The Finer Things
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG, WEBM
  • Maximum file size allowed is 1000 KB.
  • Images greater than 200x200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 894 unique user posts. View catalog

  • Blotter updated: 2018-08-24 Show/Hide Show All

We are in the process of fixing long-standing bugs with the thread reader. This will probably cause more bugs for a short period of time. Buckle up.

There's a new /777/ up, it's /Moldy Memes/ Check it out. Suggest new /777/s here.

Movies & TV 24/7 via Channel7: Web Player, .m3u file. Music via Radio7: Web Player, .m3u file.

WebM is now available sitewide! Please check this thread for more info.

Like for Swag Ragnarox 13/07/07(Sun)21:35 No. 2428
2428

File 137322572615.png - (96.42KB , 522x466 , PhilosophicalAutism.png )

Share for class.


>>
Sophisticated Gentleman 14/03/17(Mon)21:43 No. 2721

"...i found myself pondering how a computer could possibly generate a truely random number for the better part of today days..."

I fucking thought of that when I was 7, I'm pretty sure we all did.


>>
Sophisticated Gentleman 14/03/18(Tue)22:55 No. 2723

>>2721
We all know it can't.


>>
yes and no That Guy 14/03/21(Fri)08:38 No. 2726

There is no pure mathematical formula which can generate a random outcome. Some programmers come up with clever work-arounds. For example, one could look at the size of the page file in Windows directory of the hard drive (or similarly changing file in another system). One could then take the last digit from that size. There you go. That's a digit from 0 to 9 which is generated by a computer, and it is pretty darn near random.


>>
Sophisticated Gentleman 14/03/23(Sun)01:37 No. 2727

>>2726
Except if you are polling for multiple random numbers in a short span of time you are likely to get many instances of the same number in a row.

Pseudo-random number generation is a complete science in itself.


>>
Sophisticated Gentleman 14/03/23(Sun)18:25 No. 2734

>>2726
That doesn't sound very clever at all, those numbers would not be uniformly distributed and so wouldn't be pretty darn near random. Lower numbers would likely occur more than higher numbers.

The best way to generate a pseudo-random number is to use the computer's internal clock (which is continuously changing) combined with a Mersenne twister.


>>
Sophisticated Gentleman 14/03/23(Sun)18:37 No. 2736

>>2428
oh god, you guys are the biggest fucking losers I've ever seen, where you think that fedoras are cool or anything is beyond me, let alone wearing fucking trench coats and growing a neckbeard like a front lawn jesus christ this is pitiful


>>
Sophisticated Gentleman 14/03/24(Mon)17:53 No. 2737

>>2736
Yup.


>>
Sophisticated Gentleman 14/04/15(Tue)21:13 No. 2751

>>2736
Doubleyup.

Was p sure OPs post was for parody, but now less sure.


>>
Sophisticated Gentleman 14/04/18(Fri)01:30 No. 2754

Gentlemen, please. Your collective conduct is rather unbecoming. As users of this board, it is your duty to act and speak in a civilised manner. I can see that there are certain disagreements in this thread, however I see no need for foul language and name calling.

In regards to the OP; I'm afraid I shall not be sharing this image with my acquaintances, for comedic purposes or otherwise. I apologize for disappointing you.


>>
Sophisticated Gentleman 14/04/18(Fri)21:05 No. 2755

The questioned posited by the OP's gentleman in the picture is indeed of utmost importance. The search of a random generator, based solely on deterministic rules, seem to be a contradiction in itself and yet, one that is continually advanced. While no current scheme is perfect they are often within the error mark of many systems and they certainly took more than two days to formulate.

As for the gentleman's attire, I must say quite dandy.



[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts]



Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason