-  [WT]  [PS]  [Home] [Manage]

[Return]
Posting mode: Reply
  1.   (reply to 12624)
  2.   Help
  3. (for post and file deletion)
/hi/ - History and Culture
  • Supported file types are: JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 1000 KB.
  • Images greater than 200x200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 515 unique user posts. View catalog

  • Blotter updated: 2011-01-12 Show/Hide Show All

Reminder: IPv6 enabled users have exclusive access to the /vip6/ board. You don't need access to /VIP/ to access /vip6/.

Channel7 is streaming Movies and TV daily, click here for the web player, or here for the .m3u.


here's a question. Historian 12/06/22(Fri)14:00 No. 12624
12624

File 13403664548.jpg - (43.31KB , 450x319 , stock-photo-theodore-roosevelt-and-abraham-lincoln.jpg )

you are forced into unarmed combat with one of these presidents during their physical peak, Lincoln http://www.cracked.com/blog/abraham-lincoln-portrait-crazy-badass/ Theodore Roosevelt is of course Theodore Roosevelt. Who do you choose as your opponent?


>>
Historian 12/06/22(Fri)14:53 No. 12625

damn. uhh, probably Roosevelt- at least he had asthma- I could probably run around long enough for him to get winded, then wail on his junk or something.

got a plan


>>
Historian 12/06/24(Sun)12:06 No. 12639

You're fucked either way. Lincoln was a freak of nature, while Roosevelt also has inhuman determination. If all presidents had a face of, they would be the final contenders (with Andrew Jackson in third place because of pure insanity fueled rage, and Taft would be the wild-card due to his mass).

Now if you got to face Washington or Jefferson, then you'd stand a chance.


>>
Historian 12/06/24(Sun)18:09 No. 12643

>>12639
some dainty-ass planters who never lifted a finger would be heaven compared to that monstrous mass of man-meat lincoln. that dude could probably literally break you in half, and apologize while doing it.


>>
Historian 12/06/25(Mon)03:46 No. 12644

Obama

That fucking foreigner is so much smaller than I he will be destroyed! I kid you not I have the urge to own him at quakeworld and punch him until he can't lie anymore!


>>
Historian 12/06/25(Mon)05:32 No. 12645
12645

File 134059512134.png - (192.77KB , 400x289 , BirtherConspiracy.png )

>>12644
>foreigner


>>
Historian 12/06/25(Mon)05:46 No. 12648

give me two years and i could produce a badly photoshopped birth certificate, too

of course, mine would be more convincing


>>
Historian 12/06/25(Mon)05:54 No. 12649
12649

File 13405964712.jpg - (44.92KB , 524x336 , HillbillyPersecute.jpg )

>>12648
>two years


>>
Historian 12/06/25(Mon)13:35 No. 12652

I'd fight Licoln. Better to take on the guy who has a reputation for vampire hunting.


>>
Historian 12/06/25(Mon)17:19 No. 12656

>>12652
But what if you're a vampire?


>>
Historian 12/06/25(Mon)19:44 No. 12660
12660

File 134064625425.jpg - (38.18KB , 700x420 , obama_contemptable 1.jpg )

>two years
maybe he had the family dog do the job?


>>
Historian 12/06/25(Mon)19:45 No. 12661

>>12656
guess it depends on what kind of vampire you are


>>
Historian 12/06/25(Mon)23:09 No. 12662
12662

File 134065854019.jpg - (41.15KB , 400x300 , conspiracy.jpg )

>>12648
>photoshop
Extraterrestrials just put a secret dimple in your hat.


>>
Historian 12/06/26(Tue)03:28 No. 12665

>>12662
we wouldn't want you to strain your brain by even looking at the forensic evidence, when it's so much easier to blindly worship your messiah uncritically by playing the 'conspiracy theory' card

so much for intellectual honesty and whatever passes for ethics where it infringes on your drooling cult of personality


>>
Historian 12/06/26(Tue)03:30 No. 12666

>>12664
>forensic evidence
So one of you nutjobs have physically examined the document? Has your "expert" also physically examined a wide array of documents issued by the hospital/state of the same age, to determine if those "errors" you're finding aren't just commonplace to documents issued at that time?

No? Then you haven't forensically examined anything.


>>
Historian 12/06/26(Tue)04:11 No. 12667

>>12665
Yes, it's very honest to bray like a mule at every turn since 2008 while insisting it's not because of partisanship and racism.

At least your boy McConnell was honest for a moment, when he declared that the only goal Republicans had was to accomplish nothing of value at all, so they can blame their inaction on Obama.

Of course, that happened AFTER they insisted on the individual mandate for health care reform, only to realize that their requirement was wildly unpopular with lunatics like yourself.


>>
Historian 12/06/26(Tue)05:46 No. 12668

just keep playing the party card and the race card... resorting to distraction tactics is so much more 'honest' for you than looking at any of the forensic evidence


>>
Historian 12/06/26(Tue)15:59 No. 12670

>>12668
Race card? Please illuminate us just why no-one ever asked for a birth certificate from any previous president.


>>
Historian 12/06/26(Tue)20:10 No. 12675

how many previous presidents were ever born outside of the continental US?

how many of those could have provided a valid birth certificate without hesitation or dissembling in a matter of days if requested?

if you candidate was ever questioned on 'any' issue of character, it was 'always' race based... sounds like the racism is a well-represented bias on the left side of the spectrum


>>
Historian 12/06/26(Tue)20:32 No. 12677

>>12675
How would you know where the presidents were born? Have you seen the certificates? Or do you just believe what they write on wikipedia? You won't believe the nigger was born in Hawaii, but without presenting any proof you assert that previous presidents were born in the US?

And here's a man not born in the Continental US: John McCain. Where's his certificate?


>>
Historian 12/06/26(Tue)21:19 No. 12680
12680

File 134073837589.jpg - (15.50KB , 450x177 , joke-unified.jpg )

aww... how sad that the special messiah snowflake doesn't have to play by the same 'rules' as all the other guys - guess all that open transparency was too hard to manage in an honest campaign


>>
Historian 12/06/27(Wed)03:15 No. 12681

>>12680
What rules? Where was Washington's birth certificate? Can you prove Lincoln was not actually Canadian? Show me the documentation. None of these other guys have ever been questioned.


>>
Historian 12/06/27(Wed)07:01 No. 12683
12683

File 134077327394.jpg - (21.31KB , 310x452 , Ron-White.jpg )

riiight... so Abraham Lincoln was a secret canuck, Thomas Jefferson was born in 12th century Beirut, and Herbert Hoover sold ice cubes to Eskimo children to pay for his wife's liposuction??

OK... do you want to skip past all the fun(ny) tinfoil hats arguments and liberal surrealism?

>What rules?

The question that the courts or Congress must decide is whether a British subject and citizen of Kenya, a person governed by the laws of Great Britain at the time of their birth should be considered a natural "born citizen" of the United States as required by Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 of the United States Constitution.

"No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States."

http://theobamafile.com/obamanaturalborn.htm

so you can keep on whining about 'race' - but you just look even more ridiculous every time you do it


>>
Historian 12/06/27(Wed)08:33 No. 12684
12684

File 134077880027.jpg - (23.37KB , 476x500 , BitchesWhoresCabbage.jpg )

>>12683
>The question that the courts or Congress must decide
Why must we waste millions of government dollars to determine what multiple Republican officials have already examined and validated?

And after wasting all that money, money that could be spent revitalizing the economy, will you still accept it as valid? Or will you continue to ignore the result?

I'm betting the latter. Which is why people call you racist.


>>
Historian 12/06/28(Thu)03:08 No. 12685
12685

File 134084573196.jpg - (31.21KB , 525x396 , louis black.jpg )

>Why must we waste millions of government dollars to determine what

they never did though - he wasn't even properly vetted before

>money that could be spent revitalizing the economy

you gotta be kidding, you think this administration is remotely capable of 'revitalizing' the economy - what the hell are you smoking?

>Which is why people call you racist

lets be fair, it's only sad little turds like you who have such all-consuming 'race' issues... look out, there's goes another racist - oops it was only a tree


>>
Historian 12/06/28(Thu)04:42 No. 12686
12686

File 134085132580.jpg - (28.47KB , 490x368 , RepublicanPriorities2.jpg )

>>12685
>properly vetted
The (Republican) Arizona secretary of state entertained you already once this year. He has since vetted the president and greenlit Obama for inclusion on the ballots.

Since you refuse to trust members of your own party, time and time again, that's why we know you're just a bunch of racists.

>you think this administration is remotely capable of 'revitalizing' the economy
>this administration
You do realize that Congress controls the purse strings right? And that state governments control their own purse strings, right?

Instead of wasting millions of dollars investigating something that has already been put to bed time and time again, could you maybe try spending a little money on something that doesn't involve outlawing abortions?

Is that so much to ask?


>>
Historian 12/06/28(Thu)04:58 No. 12687

>>12683

Obama was born in Hawaii. There is no argument about that. It has been established beyond all reasonable doubt. He released his birth certificate in 2008. That should have been enough. It was more than 99% of presidential candidates have ever done. But it wasn't enough for the loony brigade, so he released the full birth record in 2010. And that's still not enough?

No President in history has had their place of birth as well-established as Obama. We seen the local newspaper announcement. For this to all be part of the conspiracy you think it is, people would have to have been faking things since he was born.

And it is, very obviously, racist. If he was white, nobody - absolutely nobody - would even think to ask if he was born in the US. John McCain actually wasn't, but Congress passed a law so he could run. Mitt Romney's father wasn't born in America, but the argument against his eligibility gained no ground at all. The nutters are only able to keep churning the birther bullshit because Obama is black.


>>
Historian 12/06/29(Fri)06:36 No. 12691

>>12683
that obamafile website goes on for PAGES about definitions of natural born versus whatever-citizen. And I can strike down the entire website's argument with a couple of sentences. At the time of Obama's dad's marriage to his american wife he became a citizen. It's not like that nowadays, but it was then. Therefore, he was born to two legally-defined American citizens and is a natural-born american. Now go blow Donald Trump, I'm sure he'd love it, coming from you.


>>
Historian 12/06/30(Sat)05:23 No. 12700

>>12691
Shh, it's fun seeing them work themselves into a froth about a topic they know nothing about.


>>
Historian 12/06/30(Sat)17:29 No. 12705

>>12691

I'm pretty sure the only countries that have outlawed holocaust denial are the ones with a history of fascist insurrection, and doing so there is a way of trying to nip those insurrectionists in the bud before they start killing people who are different to them.

The evidence for the holocaust has, however, been tested in court. How many historical events can you say that for?


>>
Historian 12/07/01(Sun)02:54 No. 12707

>>12705
I think you meant to post that in the Holocaust Denial thread a couple doors down.

Though since both threads have been invaded by stormfront, I can understand why you'd get them confused.


>>
Historian 12/07/04(Wed)17:35 No. 12728

turn your thermostat down a notch or two, you're seeing racists where there aren't any


>>
Historian 12/07/05(Thu)01:40 No. 12736

>>12728
Damn straight. Just because someone hates all black people doesn't make them a racist.

Er. Wait a minute.


>>
Historian 12/07/05(Thu)22:08 No. 12742

>Damn straight. Just because someone distrusts the actions, agenda, background, integrity, and policies of one prominent elected black person doesn't make them a racist.

>Er. Wait a minute.

OK - fixed it for you in the name of social justice


>>
Historian 12/07/08(Sun)06:51 No. 12778

>>12742
That's right, even though they're racists, it doesn't matter so long as they limit their public disdain for one particular black person.

Only once you kick him out of office can they don their white hoods in public without fear.


>>
Historian 12/07/09(Mon)04:02 No. 12783

>>12778
congratulations, you've just cornered the market on magical thinking!!

Sparkle On, Dude


>>
Historian 12/07/09(Mon)20:21 No. 12788

>>12783
If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck... it's just a duck.

No fantastical stories are required to explain the duck. No long-winded winding narratives are required to justify the duck's behavior. Because it's still just a duck.


>>
Historian 12/07/09(Mon)21:44 No. 12790
12790

File 134186308116.jpg - (29.49KB , 310x413 , obama423.jpg )

yup, our prez is a duck...
holder is a duck...
pelosi is a duck...
al capone was a duck...
stalin was a duck...
musolini was a duck...


>>
Historian 12/07/09(Mon)22:04 No. 12792
12792

File 134186425926.jpg - (51.30KB , 600x556 , rick perry corndog blowjob.jpg )

>>12705

How stupid do you have to be to post comments in the wrong thread?


>>
Historian 12/07/09(Mon)23:39 No. 12795

Oh hai guys. Just thought this would spark some interesting debate.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s9StxsFllY


>>
Historian 12/07/10(Tue)03:49 No. 12796

>>12795
When members of your own clique start calling you stupid, you know you're pretty damn well fucked in the head.
http://www.humanevents.com/2011/04/25/birthertrutherstupid/


[Return]


Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason