-  [WT]  [PS]  [Home] [Manage]

[Return]
Posting mode: Reply
  1.   (reply to 14961)
  2.   Help
  3. (for post and file deletion)
/hi/ - History and Culture
  • Supported file types are: JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 1000 KB.
  • Images greater than 200x200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 510 unique user posts. View catalog

  • Blotter updated: 2011-01-12 Show/Hide Show All

There's a new /777/ up, it's /gardening/ Check it out. Suggest new /777/s here.

Movies & TV 24/7 via Channel7: Web Player, .m3u file. Music via Radio7: Web Player, .m3u file.

WebM is now available sitewide! Please check this thread for more info.

News Today. Cheetah getting extinct Historian 16/12/28(Wed)16:39 No. 14961
14961

File 14829395715.jpg - (556.01KB , 1920x1440 , 1.jpg )

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSqRC1HBtSc


>>
Historian 17/01/05(Thu)04:36 No. 14962

Youtube  So what you're saying is... they've been grinding up too many for Cheetos?


>>
Historian 17/04/05(Wed)04:17 No. 14987

Have you been following the Mandella Effect?

We're getting so many new weird and bizarre new animals maybe we'll get the Cheetah back, though they'll probably be strangely colored this time.


>>
Historian 17/04/06(Thu)01:05 No. 14988

>>14987
Mental illness and the inability to understand how memories work is going to create new animal species?

Memories are fallible. That's why human being started writing shit down in the first place. That people stop writing shit down and start viewing memories as sacrosanct is de-evolution.


>>
Historian 17/04/06(Thu)01:54 No. 14989

You should honestly research it instead of simply claiming it's mental illness.


>>
Historian 17/04/06(Thu)03:50 No. 14990

>>14989
You really should recognize that it's not a serious line of study.


>>
Historian 17/04/06(Thu)05:28 No. 14991

So, you've researched it enough to say that, or just relying on your preconceptions?


>>
Historian 17/04/07(Fri)06:00 No. 14992

>>14991
So you think it's somehow different from False Memory effects?


>>
Historian 17/04/08(Sat)06:18 No. 14993

Yes.


>>
Historian 17/04/11(Tue)05:46 No. 14994

>>14993
You should write a doctoral thesis on it then.


>>
Historian 17/04/11(Tue)06:24 No. 14995

n/a


>>
Historian 17/04/12(Wed)07:14 No. 14996

>>14995
A group just wrote a thesis on why shoelaces come untied on their own.

Its not that hard.


>>
Historian 17/04/18(Tue)04:47 No. 14998

Sure, if it's only shoelaces or product names.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDFR9Z0Os-s

We can write everything off as false memory or conspiracy theory to save time.


>>
Historian 17/04/18(Tue)05:03 No. 15000

>>14998
If you're not willing to subject your hypothesis to the scientific method, the one at fault aren't any of the people laughing at you.


>>
Historian 17/04/18(Tue)23:34 No. 15001

If you're not willing to seriously and honestly investigate the situation, then we should be laughing at your narrow minded ignorance.


>>
Historian 17/04/20(Thu)09:05 No. 15002

>>15001
So you expect everyone to do your work for you. Gotcha.


>>
Historian 17/04/20(Thu)23:12 No. 15003

No. I just expect some intellectual honesty.


>>
Historian 17/04/21(Fri)18:21 No. 15005
15005

File 149279171926.jpg - (37.67KB , 620x411 , Personality.jpg )

>>15003
>intellectual honesty
Let me see if I can explain this in simple terms you should be capable of understanding.

1) You have a hypothesis
2) I asked you to do the work to prove your hypothesis
3) You attempt to state that your hypothesis is a theory without doing any work to prove it's a theory... and that everyone is a big meany for not accepting it as a theory without you doing any work.

That's where we're at. Despite protestations to the contrary, you still need to do your work to change your hypothesis into a theory.

Posting links to videos made by incredibly stupid people (also known as YouTube) is not work. If you're not willing to seriously commit to turning your hypothesis into a theory then there's no point in continuing this discussion, because you're the one being dishonest.

It's time to grow up and put on your big boy pants little man. Or you can keep splashing around in the piss-filled kiddie pool. Your choice.


>>
Historian 17/04/21(Fri)23:39 No. 15006

No, You got it all wrong yet again. Completely wrong.


>>
Historian 17/04/22(Sat)06:32 No. 15007

>>15006
Apparently you don't understand that suggesting that you prove your hypothesis is not disbelieving your hypothesis, it's encouragement for you to prove its true.

Has this occurred to you?

Or has this post used so many words that you've got yourself balled up again, unwilling to grasp anything that's not a derivative of "yes?" If so please let me know, I'll use fewer words next time. Dumb things down to grade school level English and grammar.


>>
Historian 17/04/22(Sat)07:09 No. 15008

Sorry, you missed again. I have no need to prove any hypothesis.


>>
Historian 17/04/25(Tue)04:20 No. 15009

>>15008
>I have no need
So you don't understand the scientific method.

Maybe its time you get some counseling?

I swear they don't put you in white rubber rooms anymore. The states would rather give tax cuts to people who don't need tax cuts. So they don't have room in the budget for white rubber rooms.


>>
Historian 17/04/29(Sat)00:01 No. 15011

Maybe its time you get some counseling?


>>
Historian 17/05/05(Fri)03:14 No. 15013

>>15011
But you're the one having trouble with others pointing out your lies and bullshit.


>>
Historian 17/05/05(Fri)23:31 No. 15016
15016

File 149401990519.jpg - (87.58KB , 800x500 , mamma_always_said.jpg )

Missed again. There were no lies.

The bull is in your mind.


>>
Historian 17/05/06(Sat)03:27 No. 15017

>>15016
>There were no lies
Sadly, I think you actually believe this.

Take your own advice and seek help before you start shooting up pizzeria floors.


>>
Historian 17/05/06(Sat)07:17 No. 15018

So many ad hominem attacks.

Do you feel validated now?


>>
Historian 17/05/06(Sat)09:52 No. 15019

Youtube  >>15018
>So many ad hominem attacks.
What a surprise, another person who can dish it out but can't take it.

Don't like ad hominem attacks? Don't launch them.

>Do you feel validated now?
Well, I'll only feel validated once 1+1=3. Until that happens you're just another fool who tried to peddle his /x/ thread in another board and keeps crying about how horrible people are for not taking him seriously.

Listen, I get it. You can't admit you made a mistake. The entire fabric of reality has to have been changed. You are infallible. But what you need to realize that this isn't true. This is just a symptom an underlying mental illness. You need help to realize that you're not an infallible god who never makes mistakes. Please get the help you so desperately need before you start trying to kill all the lizard people or shooting at chemtrails or whatever other weird idea pops into your head.

BTW, if you want to include a YouTube video, this is how to do it, newfag.


>>
Historian 17/05/06(Sat)11:54 No. 15020

so you're now going on with ridiculous strawman arguments

how special


>>
Historian 17/05/08(Mon)05:51 No. 15022
15022

File 149421549516.jpg - (119.16KB , 630x990 , RevengeSociety.jpg )

>>15020
Poor snowflake, be careful you don't melt.

Meanwhile I'm not going to waste time paying any attention to conspiracy theories that anyone with more than 75 IQ points can see are patently false (not to mention idiotic).

Remember to post /x/ material in /x/, you don't want to get banned for shitposting.



[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts]


Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason