>>
>>9925
I have to demonstrate my argument, I can't actually... argue it...
I have NO idea how to make a logical argument one way or another on this one, because the question is "meaningless" unless you define "capitalism" and I'm going to tell you that it's meaningless to try, let's just call it "that thing" - not facetiously, but just because it's a shapeshifter word like any other word, but moreso like any politically charged word is
ontology beats newspeak any day of the week "if that's wrong, I don't wanna be right"
I made some posts here, and I used fixed reference points here, you don't have to accept any of this as factually true precisely in of itself, but if you accept the meanings of the words used by my references and selections, as placemarkers, then you'll see the RELATIONS and PATTERNS, as opposed to the individual bits (I think?)
https://7chan.org/hi/res/13045.html#i13682
@$*@$YHI@$ orouborous, repeating self eating snake circling the world in a never ending cycle over and over again despite the fact that people mistake the same thing over and over again as something totally new.
(all posts are reposts, there is no such thing as original content) like any tools, people will use language/words in a way that suits them personally and not the general good, and sometimes others will go along with it, who should "know better"
individual words' definitions drift, the way they're put together for psychological convenience by historically naive players, who aren't entirely naive in a worldly sense
can lead to the same old crap all over again, and it's definitely new (to them)
capitalism now means what mercantilism used to mean which used to mean what feudalism used to used to mean, which used to used to mean what imperial rome used to used to used to mean, which used to used to used to mean what monarchy/aunochs/rex used to used to used to used to mean