>>
Fraid so. OP, in your grandparents time, people went to school to get trained for doing a specific job. When Clinton signed all those free-trade agreements that destroyed all those old American jobs, he very clearly explained that the old approach was outdated, and moving forward American workers will need to be more adaptive and creative than previously to stay ahead of the curve, and should expect 20-30 jobs in their lifetimes, not 1 or 2. Unfortunately, most parents are still of the old mindset, thinking of school as something you do primarily to increase your salary, so this is still how schools market and structure themselves. Unless you are pursuing one of a few careers, a doctor or engineer, you are better served in the new job market by the type of education that predates your grandparents. The "classical liberal" (not to be confused with politically liberal) education exposes you to a broader, more well-rounded balance of subjects to make you a more widely capable and adaptable person.
However, none of this amounts to anything if you don't have any real world experience. You get it by working a shit-tier position and if you're really lucky, move up from there, but more realistically, by saving your $, starting up or partnering up in your own venture, and learning the hard way for a while first. Then you can demonstrate your ambition & brightness, but by then you likely won't want to work for someone else's corp, because compared to your own gig on the worst day, the best day at a corporate job just fucking blows.
Otherwise you're indistinguishable from all the children who mindlessly went to college "just because", and who do not ever, ever knock HR Directors socks off with cute stories of what they did as schoolchildren. Not ever.