File 150491947683.jpg - (56.60KB , 400x506 , tumblr_oogc7sGUTn1u6pvbno1_400.jpg )

File 150491962494.jpg - (56.90KB , 475x700 , tumblr_ovchotu2AV1wwv8qwo1_500.jpg )

THIS is normal to me. In fact, it is the only thing that turns me on.

File 150492233543.jpg - (74.48KB , 473x500 , tumblr_osep2eSzSH1u6pvbno1_500.jpg )

Observe: what man and woman should have been.

File 150494486963.jpg - (218.12KB , 1280x960 , Modern Society.jpg )

>Am I narcissistic
Yes.

File 150498398238.jpg - (60.17KB , 698x694 , 25-Most-Beautiful-Russian-Women18-e1467445324867.jpg )

>>21595
Nobody cares? I think it's rather interesting, especially since men today seem to like the physical traits of women being sculpted with abs and such which can only be acquired through hard work in a gym. This "gym-work" is analogous to the physical work that women should have done in the wild.

The irony is that working hard in a gym to get abs isn't a very feminine trait yet nowadays men seem to look for these qualities. They even look for well-defined, "chiselled" bone structures.

Can someone please try to rationalise this? I must have an IQ below 80. I could not understand this if my life depended on it.

File 150498469253.jpg - (31.37KB , 500x500 , 1501272327529 2.jpg )

In my world, a woman would look like this with perhaps a /very/ subtle scent to them different from my own. No pronounced differences to the extreme that today's men look for. I am all for the subtle differences, both behavioural (idiosyncratic) and physical (scentlike), not the polar opposite characteristics. I'm not into bestiality.

File 150511238186.jpg - (81.83KB , 500x666 , tumblr_mt4jfcTNGx1sogvyao1_500.jpg )

I think I'm living in the wrong era. I will place a bet that this is what homosexuality is. It's nothing perverse, but a wish to have your partner resemble you, except with a vagina. The consequence of such a socially-immersive culture that imposes ideals of what you are to be is that we're just confused and trying to re-discover what humans should have been now that women aren't needed at home all the time. Our ultimate goal is to regain independence, which I'm sure existed down our line of ancestry at some point far into the distant, distant past where both genders looked the same.

These images look normal to me. This is not a lie.

I was inclined to put this thread in the philosophy forum, but I think they would consider it too far-fetched to even be remotely close to a possibility.

File 150511246494.jpg - (150.71KB , 500x750 , tumblr_ncvq35IU9d1r7ywa1o1_500.jpg )

I know this thread is trying to be an up with Homosexual moment for everybody, and that's fine. At some point you will convince your male significant other to get a partial sex change and it will all work out for you> Until then please stop being stupid about human evolution. Your attraction to photo shopped gay porn does not make 10 million years of Sapien evolution null and void.
In the meantime enjoy this conecpt taken to its ridiculous conclusion:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PNhXYmJ0G8c

>>21608
>everybody
Not really. fe9887 just figured he could post a bunch of photoshopped gay porn to a non-porn board. Because Drama.

>>21608
What makes your recommendation null and void is the /drastic/ change of our environment that has occurred in the past few millennia. We got smarter, and started noticing patterns which lead us to being able to communicate to each other across the globe in a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of a second.

With the new age of women demanding the same full rights as men, putting their kids at daycare (no motherly touch that used to be commonplace thousands of years ago, huh?), sending them off to schools full of other children for them to become over-social, and living their lives almost independently from their children, it makes sense from an evolutionary standpoint that the human brain would shift to accommodate this drastic change of environment. Women aren't needed at home anymore, so why do we need to be so different from one another? If women are going out and working their bodies for once, you will start to notice change in every aspect of our and our children's lives.. from what the see and learn to what their brain interprets is sexually right given their environment.

I am by no means trying to show porn and get away with it on a pornless board. I'm proposing a unique idea that has never been said before and is certainly possible. It makes total sense to me.

File 15053646623.png - (11.64KB , 196x255 , Gazoo.png )

>>21612
>I'm proposing a unique idea that has never been said before
Sure you are, dum dum.

Please do us all a favor: Don't Breed.

>>21614
It is obvious that I won't since I'm not attracted to modern females.

I've never heard this idea before, and never in my readings of homosexuality have I come across it. It's very possible. In fact, in every instance in the past where someone claimed something far-fetched to be true, they were either scolded, laughed at, or killed, until the theory withstood the test of time and reason and people gradually accepted it.

I am not condemning heterosexuals. It is through you folks that the slow evolutionary transition to a species that will look relatively the same across genders will take place.

Since there is no theory or scientific explanation for homosexuality, try this one. It's rational, and, altho it might damage your self-worth and ego, it actually holds a backbone of logic which is somewhat hard to refute if you fully understand it.

The gays were almost too fast.. We jumped way ahead of ourselves biologically, and it came at the price of being totally confused by the extreme differences across genders. Fast enough that it can almost be seen as a disease to the clueless eye. The heterosexuals are in a more admirable position than we are because the slowness is the pace needed to change our biologies.

I'm not condemning you, but at the same time, if this is true, don't condemn us.

>>21615
>Since there is no theory or scientific explanation for homosexuality
Actually there is, but don't let your lack of effort to find the studies stop you from knee-jerking off a self-congratulatory long winded pat on your own back.

>>21616
There is nothing pat-on-the-back-worthy of being too quick at something that it affects your ability to reproduce. It's a curse. It's maybe what evolution calls a "mutation" but not a convenient one in terms of sexuality.

Studies have been done but nothing is conclusive. Shouldn't we know this already? They didn't find the gene, and for as much as we know, the environmental social factor of how women behave, and a mere act of mimicry, could be how the overly-quick brain decides is the best way to get what they are attracted to. There is a sexually dimorphic breed of spiders where the male is at least 3 to 4 times smaller than the female. The roles heterosexuals play isn't always necessary especially when the environment has changed so drastically, yet you folks still hold on to them. There is nothing condemnable about this. Like I said, the slowness of change in heterosexuals is admirable because change on an evolutionary level is extremely slow.

All I'm proposing is an explanation for why there are /so/ many of us with this strange "mutation" given the new age of a totally different environment. If the brain is ahead of its body, you better believe there will be mass confusion. This doesn't necessarily mean we're smarter. Don't let this be a punch to your ego. Being too quick at something renders us unable to reproduce.

File 15055495942.jpg - (40.43KB , 640x640 , Three Ways.jpg )

>>21618
nihil sub sole novum

You were not the first to think of this nor will you be the last, all you are is one more attention whore amongst the teeming masses of attention whores.

>>21619
I'm having tremendous difficulty understanding how this is "attention whoring". I never talk to people, live alone, and don't really care to interact with society insofar as I don't have an idea to share. I'm pretty sure this idea is original (yes, get over it) since nobody talks about it.

Find me any source online that talks about it or even mentions it.