What?

Wiimote should be the standard controller for all games. To look. Copy MP3's look controls. Work on a wiimote and nunchuck that don't need a sensor bar.

Should sell a phone OS, use the average or below spec as the standard for games to be made to. Use head mounted display for 3D. Use wiimote.

Zelda and Metroid have appeal to all ages. Mario doesn't. Lot of potential for both in a head mounted display.

Sell a system with the OS pre installed. Most people will buy that anyway. Or not, if not people won't blame nintemdo for ow spec.
, nintendo make their money from hardware though.

Metroid as Prime styled explorer only. Freeram from start but outer areas from the landing point on planets or areas are much harder. No keys, just difficulty, and lots to do besides struggle, ability to call ship in open area to save and fast travel to different areas. Maybe look over a 3D model in the ship and pick landing points. Need to find through progress where to go. Randomised so the interet can't spoil it.

New abiloties but start with all known ones.

Lots of easy area.

Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYNzhV8xL48

That start button looks vaguely like a PSP's. Which AC is this?

>>144468
Not OP but it looks like the PSP version to me, just with slightly better grafix. So I would guess it's either a Vita version or someone's running some good-looking filters on ppsspp.

Flying machine guns with back missiles. Use landscape, boosting to avoid attacks.Never went for a heavily armoured walking build with multiweapons.

Problem with AC like a lot of games is what works break it, you don't need variety, just some style you do well, which makes every mission the same.

If AC was made to a constant high fps with low frame times aiming changes everything, then consider blast radius, time explosions on shots. Still have auto aim and auto guns, but with a need to shoot things yourself, gui highlighting what it determines am enemy but no option to cover fire, shoot where enemy may be. Use weapons the tracking doesnt compute lead right.

Just more hectic battles that aren't predictable so ypu habe to be ready for everything.

New weapons from salvage, draw ln out battles, the longer you are there without caisong havoc the better the slvage. Enemies out of ammo dimling their weapons and using secondaries before running away.

AC like all From Software games needs a lower resolution so the detail doesn't seem as lacking. Mechs need to be suits, not giant robots. Needs to be an option to stay on the battlefield and freeroam. All missions reachable by freeroam. But no repair unless extracted. Long distances flown to using
detatchable jetpack. All equip looking functuonal. No flippant or samurai style geometry. Different combat computers/FCS have very different guis. Even differnt languages.

Parts not collectible, have to choose from the salvage from the last pickup what to trade with. Refining all the time and making mistakes. Stats different in obvious ways during play, each for a specific purpose. What you are used to doing is generally redundant upon next majior encounter. Always one step behind but just equopped well enough to survive. Completing missions is the real reward for the right loadout.

Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

buy it and support the artist

I don't get all the Fallout 4 saltiness. I agree with this guy:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQIE4jtt3So

I still haven't even played Fallout 4. I'm waiting for a complete edition of the game so that I can have a seamless experience with all the expansion packs.

>>144537
I'm waiting for the complete edition to be available for under $20.

I'll have a long wait, but I have a shitload of sub-$20 games to play in the meantime, plus all the EA games I pirate because fuck if I'm gonna install Origin.

A friend has been wanting me to play that with him, but I've been into other stuff at the moment. Should I give it a go?

>I might be interested, what's it like in your opinion

It's quite good but has it's broken bits:

Russian Bias is an obvious one, the game uses Tiers 1-5 to break up the planes and the tier you fly at is based on the average tier of your top 3 planes so you can't take Jet fighters up against bi-planes (but you can still bring them into lower tier matches), unfortunately the Russian Planes are ranked lower than their equivalents from other nations so a full wing of Russian planes will rank at 2.6 while the equivalent Germans will be 3.6. There's also some broken hit-boxes that benefit the Russian tanks/jets that have been on the to-fix list for multiple years, and post WWII ammo available to some Russian tanks. Any discussion of this on the forums tends to get you banned (forum bans carry over to the actual game).

Premium Planes, the pay to win side, whilst some of the premium planes are fairly well balanced some are massively broken, either by having major advantages or by being at a much lower tier than their non-premium counterpart (we're talking 3.7 vs 1.7 at the most extreme), and if you want rocket tanks, a showcase feature of their last major update, prepare to pay $50 per tank... yep that's right, $50.

Want to earn Premium Currency for free? You can sign up to their affiliate post videos on youtube; terms and conditions include having 500 pre-existing subscribers to your channel, NO criticism in any form, no praising of competing games and a whopping $10,000 fine for breaking these or any other T&C's including discussing the T&C's

NVidia GameWork is also a big source of problems, they forced it into the game to get an NVidia payback, killed performance for many players and haven't even developed hydroplane gameplay (they shoe-horned a recycled domination event, ran it for a week and that was it).

Gaijin are basically money grabbing censors. Don't get me wrong, the game is fun but by the time you get your first T4 you'll realise how many things they do wrong and likely give-up unless you've invested real-world cash.

And whatever you do, don't play with a joystick, the game flies much better with mouse aim than you could ever get with stick.
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

I've been meaning to get into it with a netplay friendo for a while now but I have like a gigabyte of updates to download before I can even attempt to use it.

>>143834
I guess I never paid attention to how they looked after the landing :D

>>143568
That was supposed to be an ingame feature, by the way.
Another thing they never implemented.

File 145897298480.jpg - (242.76KB , 1920x1080 , ICU.jpg )

Well, 1.1 is supposed to drop soon. Hope springs eternal.

>>144483
>manchildren
you know, I played again the other night and that's exactly how you'd describe the tryhards I encountered, circle jerking each other on goddamn harvest for the 800th time.

My life is better now that I've stopped playing it.

>>144484
That's generally how I feel about all "competitive" FPS games, and most multiplayer FPS games in general. Getting noscope shot from 3/4 of the way across the map really makes you wonder what kind of idiots are drawn to modern multiplayer FPS games.

My favorite was in Battlefield 1942's desert storm mod, you could kill someone from a quarter of the way across the map with a shotgun, just aim it in their vague direction and empty the magazine, occasionally you'd kill them. Wow, such tremendous skill. Oddly enough shooting someone scoped in with a sniper rifle took more skill because the hitbox was so much smaller.

Youtube  >>144483
Different game, point remains.

I really wish someone could explain why the level up stats on the battle screen don't translate to the status screen out of battle... I'd love you forever. Sexually

it came out some time ago, im just really behind the times and trying to play catchup. no one was able to explain wtf is going on so i gave up on it and finished the game. found a gold password with hacked stat boosting items added so i can make up for all that tedious leveling with no benefit