>>17501
Of course it is, it's edited to look like Smile.jpg.

File 136816351929.png - (84.92KB , 300x239 , po.png )

A fat, bald, albino, eyelid-less, nose-less, big mouthed clown chick. Honestly, some of the shit from Pokemon is scarier than Jeff the Killer.

http://www.viddler.com/v/d8d26566
For example, see this missingno from Yellow?
It sees you too.

I am unconvinced that you have forgotten anything important. I conclude this from the fact that I am an actual amnesiac, and lost memories just don't work that way. A memory might be suppressed and still produce those symptoms; I don't know about that. I remain skeptical of even the repressed memory scenario.

If there really is such a memory that has been lost or suppressed, it can be uncovered by digging around it. Memories are like a mine shaft. If you can't dig to the vein directly, you dig out the area around the vein. Set aside some time when you are standing in line or before you go to bed to remember other stuff, preferably from around the time of the missing memory. A memory of a place might trigger a memory of a sound which leads to a memory of the scent which brings you to the memory you want (if it exists at all).

For whatever technique you may use, keep in mind that there's a greater chance of getting a false memory than a repressed one. Good luck with that shit though.

A tulpa would know your mind better than you would, and might not kill you...

File 136813888119.jpg - (49.87KB , 512x352 , smile.jpg )

Not very paranormal or creepy, but okay.

File 136816197116.jpg - (20.28KB , 250x250 , 1327961397282.jpg )

>>17333

(Background static grows extremely loud at this point and distorts some of Ingerson’s speech. Later analysis of cartography data suggests that A-001B was approaching the building and causing this interference)
Ingerson: … … for everyone around him.
Marsh: And so what happened afterwards?
Ingerson: After that project? Well like I said we had two we were focusing on. The next was a bit more difficult because it required more specialist equipment. We were dealing with medical rigs that we'd never used or seen before along with processors and custom build computers. The idea was a different.
Marsh: Could you give a brief description of the project?
Ingerson: The core idea was a simple one. We wanted to make a biological circuit. We were trying to grow neurons from stem cells across a silicon scaffold to allow free electrical transmission of signals. It was fundamentally very difficult because organic cells respond quite badly to foreign bodies. The circuitry, heat and charge of the electrical equipment were just frying everything we made. Even when the cells didn't burn up there were small immune responses that stopped it all functioning. We tried lots of different approaches, but the equipment we were using was expensive and easily broken. After a while we realised we couldn't keep taking all the stuff we were using from H&P and our enthusiasm started to drop.
Marsh: But you continued?
Ingerson: Yeah. It's important that I give you an idea of how important that drive and energy was. You've got to bear in mind we were doing all of this after work and on weekends. All our money was invested, all our time, all our energy. The only thing keeping all of it going was that we both believed we could achieve something awesome. When this project started to take a turn from the worse it hit us pretty hard. I had a hard time keeping my shit together - I wasn't eating well and things were starting to go downhill at work. I was making mistakes with some of the cultures I'd been working on with my team, and when you're screwing up the work of 10 people as well as your own management start to get angry. So yeah, things were getting pretty tough.
Marsh: And what about Martin?
Ingerson: Martin was still almost the same at work. When we were together I saw in him the same fatigue that I was feeling, but he didn't seem to shoulder it the same way I did. He was still just as determined as when we'd started. I'm sure that I would've given up on our extra-curricular work unless he'd been so devoted.
Marsh: Did you think there might be another reason for him staying motivated?
Ingerson: No.
(A loud noise at this point interrupts the interview. Static can be heard again)

is that all, that cant be all, there must be more, there is more right right?!?!

Marsh: ... ... want them to hear it ... ... know.
Ingerson: ... ... more important that we don't get buried.
Marsh: We're fine for now. Carry on.
Ingerson: Well we'd been carrying on with different variants of the same experiment, but we'd really hit a brick wall as far as the setup was concerned. The cells weren't lasting long enough to carry the signals we were putting in, and even if they were it wouldn't have been fast enough to be able to compete with current generation hardware. It was looking more and more like a complete failure. Martin was sure that things could be turned around, but after spending so many fruitless nights trying to come up with any kind of solution I was just about ready to throw in the towel. In fact on a couple of occasions I did, or at least told Martin I wasn't interested any more.
Marsh: So why did you go back to the experiment?
Ingerson: He was so sure. I've never really seen anyone so completely convinced they were right. It almost seemed as though he was more and more motivated as the results went downhill. It was confusing but at the same time inspiring. I didn't really know what to think to be honest, but the projects and work together didn't leave me much time to think. He probably could've said anything in a commanding enough voice and I would've done it, you know? I was mentally exhausted.
Marsh: It sounds like a difficult situation.
Ingerson: It was and it wasn't. I was pretty conscious of the mental state I was in, and didn't really mind carrying on. I wanted to be a part of something excellent, I was just sad that this thing wasn't turning out that way. Well, until things started changing. That's when I really got back on board.
Martin and I had been working for the best part of a month on a side-line project that we thought might give us a bit of a hint as to why our main experiments weren't working so well. We had cultured some of the neurons we were using in the circuit with some viral plasmids. Plasmids are like little circles of genetic code that let us change the way something biological works genetically. We were using plasmids that would drop extra genes into the cells to make them more resistant to heat. It was pretty tough because gene therapy was really far outside our remit. Martin had done some stuff for his PhD, but other than that we were going on advice from people at work and research papers. As far as we could tell, the plasmids weren't really having any effect. I was sure that it was just because we didn't really understand the theory behind it, but Martin was just as sure about our trajectory as ever. I didn't realise until later on that Martin had chosen this side project because he was trying to push our work into areas of genetic biology that I didn't understand.
Marsh: So you’re saying that his side-tracking into other dis Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

Boring. Lunar landing hoax was way better. Need something to really shake up the world of hoaxes again. :(

>>17382
constructive

>>17382
you didn't even watch the video at all and just made up random bullshit to discredit it.

puppet logic

>>17622
>God is honest, always, perfectly.

2 Chronicles 18:22
Now therefore, behold, the Lord hath put a lying spirit in the mouth of these thy prophets.

Ezekiel 14:9
And if a prophet be deceived when he hath spoken a thing, I the Lord have deceived that prophet.

2 Thessalonians 2:11
For this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie.

>They are, but kinda metaphorically.

So what criteria do you use to decide when the Bible is speaking literally and when it is speaking metaphorically?
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>17630

>The Bible tells you that The Bible is the best.

Man, trust me, if the bible didnt work, the kinda guy i was while i talked to u in the beginning, you know, no restraint on words, my exact words would be to throw your book into the gutters. I mean those would have been my exact words, coz i actually talked like that and have used that phrase a lot in my life, lol.

I'm not saying the bible is the best because it says so. I'm saying so because it actually does give the outputs exactly the way it claims to. The luxuries in the west example aside. What i mean mainly is that you can hear from God(Jesus, the Holy Spirit and the Father) if you do what it says. Mainly this,

John 14:23 - Jesus replied, “Anyone who loves me will obey my teaching. My Father will love them, and we will come to them and make our home with them.

See the "we will come to them" part of that verse. That means Jesus and the Father will 'both' come to you and make their home with you. I mean you have to look into every word. If someone misses the we there, he'd end up missing out a lot. The bible is a very deep book.

Once you actually hear from Jesus or the Holy Ghost, you'll be good to go.

Well, i would like for people to have God's company on earth everyday. I mean that was what i meant when i said God>heaven. God's company, the Father meets you as a father, and also, Jesus meets you as a brother, yes, a brother, you can be friends with Jesus too if you wish. Concentrate on an everyday relationship with Jesus the first time you hear from Him. Well until you actually hear from Jesus all you can do is try. I mean the teachings by Jesus on the mount should be enough for that to happen. I mean until then you'd be
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>17694
>I'm not saying the bible is the best because it says so. I'm saying so because it actually does give the outputs exactly the way it claims to.

Look up "cold reading".

Shadow People are my favorite monsters. Capitalize that S and that P to show some respect. Let's do this!

There are many reasons that I like Shadow People. They are more corporeal than ghosts (which were the trendy monsters of late 80s and early 90s) and yet more ethereal than chupacabras and vampires (which were the trendy monsters of the late 90s and the 00s). Their existence can never be proven because they leave no proof. They are brilliant and strategic and curious yet they trigger the most primitive of human fears. They are omnipresent and at the same time not really there at all. It is a cryptozoology lore which is being written as we write these comments, yet it comes form a fear which predates history and thus they appear in every mythology. Are they extraterrestrials? Ultraterrestrials? Demons? They are whatever you (or they) want to be.

>>17396
In regards to the statement that Shadow People are demons, yeah, sort of -- it depends on your definition of the term 'demon.' Personally, I would consider a demon to be some type of entity which is evil by definition and by its nature. A demon has no choice but to be wicked. Shadow People, who are reported to be very patient in their actions and very intelligent, might also be evil. The difference is that Shadow People choose to be evil and because of that choice, they cannot be demons. This marks the end of my rant on completely subjective terminology which was describing b.s. in the first place.

>>17434
Cool story, Bro. I will add this to my collection of Shadow People reports.

>>17394
No, I have not been so angry that I swung a catcus, but I might try it.

No, I do not believe in Shadow People. I hope someone proves me wrong.

>>17409
the Ouija has been around far longer than Milton Bradley. They simply mass-produced Ouija boards because they were a popular thing. Trufax.
And OP, I dunno, shadow people is used to describe a lot of different encounters. I haven't seen much agreement on what they are/do other than being creepy (and obviously looking like shadows)

>>17607

Noooo, Ouija is a brand name which is owned by Milton Bradley. The term is derived from two foreign words meaning yes: oui and ja. The generic name for the device is "spirit board." The practice of using a spirit board came about during the late Nineteenth Century from the American Spiritualist Movement.

One of the popular parlor games of the time was called spirit writing, and it involved allowing ghosts to possess a person's hands. Folks was like, day-um, I gots ink all over my hands from dat sloppy ghost. So people starting making spirit boards which did not require quills, and much later Milton Bradley saw profits to be made and bought out the brand name of a particular spirit board maker.

So, Ouija boards have not been around far longer than Milton Bradley.

Back to the topic, Tinny, are you suggesting that Shadow People are more of an effect than a species? Yeah, I can see that.

Try searching for the term "synchronicity."

Tim Allen wrote about it for a few pages in I'm Not Really Here.

Let us know if you turn up anything else, Anon.

to impress their alien overlords ?

>>17649
Bitches don't know about my one child policy

>>17677

And what, exactly, do you think is done with the extra children?

Why bother building an android at great expense when you've got a fully programmable disposable human being?

well fuckers?

Yep, totally legit