-  [WT]  [PS]  [Home] [Manage]

[Return]
Posting mode: Reply
  1.   (reply to 844831)
  2. (for post and file deletion)
/b/ - Random POLITICS ARE BANNED ON /b/ FOR NOW.
Direct all politics-related shit to /civ/ or get banned.

  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG, WEBM
  • Maximum file size allowed is 10240 KB.
  • Images greater than 200x200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 1042 unique user posts. View catalog

  • Blotter updated: 2018-08-24 Show/Hide Show All

Movies & TV 24/7 via Channel7: Web Player, .m3u file. Music via Radio7: Web Player, .m3u file.


Anonymous 26/05/31(Sun)01:24 No. 844831
844831

File 178018347110.jpg - (299.87KB , 1000x667 , IMG_3547.jpg )

Flock security cameras have been placed in nearly every city with more than a few thousand residents, and all across every high/free-way in the country in just a few years. these cameras utilize artificial intelligence to, apparently, “scan license plates” to track ‘criminals’ across every road they travel on and make it easier for the police to track them down. any non-retard can already see the apparent issue with this approach, that being, flock, and anyone with access to the cameras could track anyone across the cameras, there’s also no doubt in my mind that they can and will use these cameras to facially recognize you, even from a glance, and see whatever you’re displaying on your phone, laptop etc. Flock has literal tens of thousands of cameras in every major city in america, and they aren’t slowing down at producing them, of course, this is all in the name of ‘safety’ similarly to how making people verify they are adults online is for the “safety” of children. they are spying on you constantly. there are also other companies producing the same type of cameras that use ai to detect license plates or faces, across multiple cameras. however, my fellow anons, there is a simple solution here. we must take action to remove these cameras with force. anything less than violence will never achieve major change in our society. acquire a reciprocating saw with steel cutting blades, use the deflock app to see where the cameras are located, and cut them down. this is of course only the simplest way to remove them, and costs less than 200-300 dollars. if we allow this to go on, america will continue to collapse further into a surveillance state.


>>
Anonymous 26/05/31(Sun)04:12 No. 844832

test

(CRITICAL FAILURE)


>>
Anonymous 26/05/31(Sun)23:01 No. 844851

>>844832
So it goes


>>
Anonymous 26/06/04(Thu)10:53 No. 844911

>>844852

Thanks anon, good link.
Keep your back stage pass handy


>>
Anonymous 26/06/08(Mon)10:32 No. 844998

>>844831
Use a very quiet 22 rifle with a scope. Some models are no louder than a bb gun


>>
Anonymous 26/06/08(Mon)12:29 No. 844999

>>844998
Good idea, But really dangerous in a city, be fucking careful.

I know I'm not supposed to be posting, but let me tell you a short story that actually happened. This wasn't like on the news, I know it through reputable friends. A guy accidentally shot a machine gun into the air. Army guy, I'm in euro, civilians don't have machine guns. He was immediately reprimanded for it but they thought that that was it. Sometime later, I think like kilometers from the army training place, they found a dead old lady in the middle of the forest with a machine gun wound to the head.. Well, if that can happen, think about what can happen in a city.


>>
Anonymous 26/06/08(Mon)12:30 No. 845000

>>844999
A literal impossibility



[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts]



Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason