/phi/ - Philosophy

Anonymous ## Mod ## 11/10/26(Wed)10:01 No. 3905 [Reply] Stickied

File 13196161034.jpg - (71.49KB , 256x256 , slow.jpg )

For growing and shit or whatever I present to you:

THE BIG STICKIED THREAD OF PHILOSOPHY RESOURCES

Put in whatever resources that fit in here, whether it's from wikipedia, youtube, some university, or where ever. Just remember to keep it within the board's guidelines and rules.
Use it or lose it, faggots.

42 posts and 6 images omitted. Click Reply to view.

>>

Anonymous 22/07/24(Sun)18:34 No. 15021

https://www.youtube.com/c/KaneB
https://www.youtube.com/c/carneadesofcyrene
You can find there lectures on many philosophical subjects

Anonymous ## Mod ## 12/02/02(Thu)05:26 No. 5920 [Reply] [First 100 posts] [Last 50 posts] Stickied

File 132815678430.jpg - (161.57KB , 500x452 , 6904084_Untitled-2.jpg )

This thread is for discussion of the validity of religion(s) and arguments for and against the existence of god/gods.

Any other new posts about this subject will be deleted, or locked and referred to this one.

New threads about religious concepts that play inside their own ruleset are allowed, and we kindly ask that you refrain from turning those well meaning threads into arguments about religion as a whole.

405 posts and 29 images omitted. Click Reply to view.

>>

Anonymous 26/07/20(Mon)22:37 No. 17391

>>17387
But where did God come from?

Anonymous 24/11/06(Wed)15:27 No. 15749 [Reply]

File 173090324550.jpg - (162.61KB , 600x409 , happy-birthday-nigga-dff8f961df.jpg )

Anti-natalism is fucking retarded but also has a point. Forget the troubles of this world you're gonna put a child in. Even in a perfect utopia, how can you birth a child without any way of discussing with them about their decision to be born or not and carry the burden of their senses like constant anxiety of death or hunger? Well actually, you can and people do every second according to some internet stats, but how can you justify it other than that creampies feel good?

43 posts and 8 images omitted. Click Reply to view.

>>

Anonymous 26/07/04(Sat)16:40 No. 17357

>>17351
Yea I understand.
Too bad that friendship is often portrayed as the privilege of trading edgy insults for fun.

>>

Anonymous 26/07/04(Sat)16:40 No. 17359

>>17335
This.
Homo sapiens had a good run

>>

Anonymous 26/07/23(Thu)21:48 No. 17392

>>17320
> suspect for the current kids it can work that way as well, many prospects are bleak, but that allows them to invent something out of the box, at least for one or two of them. You know like watermelon seed effect. We'll see...

That’s not necessarily true. It will only work for a minority. Most will fall to the wayside.

Anonymous 22/07/06(Wed)04:33 No. 14985 [Reply]

File 165707483499.png - (348.83KB , 649x670 , average_millennial.png )

The point of life is to grow up.
So why are humans so obsessed with childhood? And while being misopediac?

Why does society go at great lengths to patronize the youth for developing any sense of individuality?

Whenever I hear an adult say "I wish I was a kid again", what I see is "I suck at adulting and I hate responsibility".

Most people are plagued by childish desires but instead of reconciliation and growing into true adulthood, they'd rather pout and moan inwardly.

It's no wonder why midlife crisis is blending into quarter-life crisis.
It's no wonder why adolescence is being lengthened.
In fact, adolescence is artificial.

I'm dramatising, but I'm not joking when I think that there's an undercurrent of fear/contempt for maturation.

Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

19 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.

>>

Anonymous 25/04/21(Mon)00:08 No. 16393

File 174518693775.png - (187.25KB , 1080x1565 , Screenshot_20250420_151029_Firefox.png )

>>14985
>>14985
>adolescence is artificial
This is completely accurate, your instincts are right. Adolescence was invented in the 20th century to keep kids in school longer.
https://archive.org/details/TheParadoxOfExtendedChildhood-JohnTaylorGatto

Our modern society is literally structured around large corporations supported by swathes of borderline slave workers.

IMO without this education system we would follow our is tints more and learn the actual necessary skills of survival in the school of life. We wou have decentralized support networks where as we are currently at the opposite extreme of atomized individuals reliant on corporations for employment or government financial support. Humans naturally learn what is necessary to survive and naturally have creativity and ingenuity, but these kinds of independent people are not good consumers nor are they obedient workers.

We are all captive to this system and thus more or less children to the state, our new Mom.

>>

Anonymous 25/06/02(Mon)04:51 No. 16600

>>16391
There have been a lot of works that talk about it, but it's not talked about a lot.
People would rather talk about "muh woke" or "muh red pill".
Also:
>There is no expectation of responsibility, but IMO what many miss is that responsibility is what makes you feel satisfied in adulthood.

Wrong. Responsibility is expected.
But, the definition of responsibility is almost always reduced to procreation.

People think that child-rearing is the only form of responsibility. And they cannot even do that properly.

>>16393
Adolescence was created in the eighteenth century. But it was universalised by the twentieth century.
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>

Anonymous 26/07/12(Sun)18:48 No. 17385

To continue with this: there’s this recent phenomenon of where people are saying “eighteen thru twenty four aren’t adults yet” which is been used to excuse delayed maturation due to our current sociopolitical climate.

Anonymous 25/11/13(Thu)08:11 No. 16967 [Reply]

File 176301791275.png - (335.40KB , 2000x2000 , 1762579476190.png )

What does the philosophy board think of this chart?

>>

Anonymous 26/07/12(Sun)07:24 No. 17384

Where would you put David Dees on there?

Anonymous 22/04/28(Thu)06:19 No. 14936 [Reply]

File 165111954799.png - (288.61KB , 479x435 , unknown.png )

Friends, I'm dying for direction. What I want is Solipsism as a topic handled from an Existential standpoint, not epistemologically. I want to learn about how Hollywoodian Solipsism effects our mentality and turns us into self-serving drones. I know that might be too opinionated and specific so I am also fine with anything that touches it tangentially. If you have any thoughts on the issue yourself I'd love to hear it.

21 posts and 4 images omitted. Click Reply to view.

>>

Anonymous 26/07/12(Sun)01:59 No. 17381

>>17380
If you can’t read that’s not my fault.

>>

Anonymous 26/07/12(Sun)02:06 No. 17382

>>17381
Am I schitzo insane or is everything he says either the boringest shit ever or the most vibe consistent stupid meaningless troll you'll see only mastered on 7chan? Hats off regardless. But if it's a troll, man, the dedication and the vibe consistency (while keeping it this level of boring) is something that should be studied by future generations.

Truly something to behold either way. The guy who's responding is not the less either, I mean to bring this out, truly a dance of two, I swear to God and if none of this is acted, shoot me already, I'm completely delusional and everything is a conspiracy, but you can't tell me this isn't extraordinary.

>>

Anonymous 26/07/12(Sun)07:22 No. 17383

>>17382
Who are you talking about?

The paradox Anonymous 26/07/04(Sat)06:16 No. 17352 [Reply]

File 178313860954.png - (2.26MB , 1536x1024 , 0e4f885a-322c-44d9-9db1-1b0cfb54bfdb.png )

Imagine an infinite corridor of doors. Exactly one of them leads to a bad world; every other door leads to a good one. You open the doors one by one, and every world you find is good. You keep searching for the bad world, but every door reveals only another good one.

So where is the door to the bad world?

8 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.

>>

Anonymous 26/07/06(Mon)05:58 No. 17366

>>17363
People like to glorify suffering as a way to cope with never having any prospects or fucking it up big-time

>>

Anonymous 26/07/06(Mon)23:04 No. 17367

>>17366
Nigga, if you didn't glorify suffering, you wouldn't be here, trust me.

>>

Anonymous 26/07/07(Tue)06:40 No. 17368

>>17367
I beg to differ.
Glorifying suffering is mainly a way for people to cope with not being special, or rather that they cannot handle the realization that being human means that they’re still subject to the laws of nature and that all their hopes and dreams are not entirely within their control.

A Philosophia Anonymous 26/07/02(Thu)01:40 No. 17342 [Reply]

File 178294920795.jpg - (1.69MB , 3072x4096 , IMG_20260625_191423.jpg )

Thankfulness seems to be the only thing that I have and there seems to be an endless amount of it.

Can you look around? Can you see? What do you have on your hands? In my case it seems I have a lot of thankfulness. Muscle. Goodness.

Reading comprehension is fucked Anonymous 26/06/30(Tue)14:42 No. 17330 [Reply]

I might be incredibly biased since I experience most of this through the internet but what baffles me is people who string together a couple words from your post and get enraged by it for zero reason... As to what is going through these people's heads, i have no idea. Help me out please.

Lolicon Ethics Anonymous 25/03/06(Thu)04:28 No. 16161 [Reply]

File 174123169722.jpg - (2.24MB , 2550x3300 , the_illest_villian_by_aubyplushproductions_dha6euh.jpg )

I can't tell whether (anti-lolicon rhetoric) is a serious issue or the new moral outrage" isn't advocacy, promotion of, or posting of pedophilia and pedophilic content. It's asking a question about whether or not this seemingly first world issue facing chronically online anime communities is serious enough to warrant such extensive hate campaigns by communities like the Sharty and Kiwi Farms while we sleep on seemingly more serious issues like Du Pont diamond mining, child labor in Africa, Nestle corporation, Donald Trump taking over America, and of course western PROVEN nonces.

I grew up with gore cartoons like Happy Tree Friends and a bunch of shocking shit on sites like YTMND. Bug-eyed cartoon characters may actually have some psychological factors connected to reality, but I'm looking for evidence. The only scientific literature I've seen is from team 'p here. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1s2PL7TcWJfxDGzKn1M7jnMLViOI6Dvj_ I'm asking for team anti-'p's side so I can become a more informed individual.

I don't support lolicon, but anti-lolicon communities seem to have philosophy where, "If you're not eagerly fer us, you're eagerly against us", and it lacks nuance. We should care about the basics of Maslow's hierarchy of needs more than supposed e-politics. If there's significant empirical evidence (or even a good enough common man argument) against lolicon, I want to KNOW why it's wrong, rather than be TOLD to agree.

If minors are being groomed by lolicons, it's probably because minors are using social media before the age of 18 (which they obviously should not be doing, yet society accepted for some reason). Why are we reverting to "think of the children!!1" days? Babysitting minors online should never be a part of your ethos. Keep your kids on Neopets and off of social media.

What do YOU think about lolicon and its ethics?

18 posts and 1 image omitted. Click Reply to view.

>>

Anonymous 26/06/24(Wed)21:04 No. 17285

>>17282
Thanks for proving my point that yall are retarded
Why do you think I appended
>(digitally simulaculate the raping of a child)
Nigger

>>

Anonymous 26/06/26(Fri)18:28 No. 17297

>>17285
I know that you meant that as a joke but still.
Also to address OP, I find it funny that lolishota is considered pedophilic but furry is now sympathized as separate from bestiality.
Rapeplay and gore are also accepted as being separate from reality

Hell, people have no problem with child violence in fiction

>>

Anonymous 26/06/27(Sat)06:08 No. 17312

I know this is really an unpopular opinion but kids having social media isn’t the real problem. In fact I think banning kids from social media is really just gonna make the problem worse.
Social media is overblamed for youth problems that were already pre-existent before then.

I think the real problem is how we treat them as delicate pets over everything, not teaching them hood their own ground