The planet, yes, it's beautiful.

Humanity? I've been thinking about this a bit, but watching humanity fail to deal with climate change is an eye opener.

I've started to think that we just don't deserve to survive. We're a cruel, selfish species that can't work together to solve large problems. We don't deserve it, not in a moral sense, but in a practical one. It would be negative for such a primitive abusive force to spread in the universe.

>>6696
In this big universe, I'm sure there are plenty of planets just as or even more beautiful than Earth.

There are planets that even rain diamonds. Imagine how beautiful that must be.

File 164198773831.jpg - (70.57KB , 828x468 , greta_2.jpg )

>>6692
Yes.

>>6696
>Humanity? I've been thinking about this a bit, but watching humanity fail to deal with climate change is an eye opener.

>I've started to think that we just don't deserve to survive. We're a cruel, selfish species that can't work together to solve large problems. We don't deserve it, not in a moral sense, but in a practical one. It would be negative for such a primitive abusive force to spread in the universe.
I think that the most underrated hindrance to save the climate is NOT the polluters. Especially not coal miners. Because they are predictable. Mine coal. Get money. Repeat.

What we see now is a bunch of hibernated commies or never-was-commies or was-commies-but-had-good-intentions-also-Singapore that are scenting the morning air. Wich is really interesting, because they had not been able to think new thoughts after 1969 and not after 1989. I've been to a few climate demos in Stockholm. And if you gave me 1 SEK for every time I heard someone play "Bella ciao" I could...buy you a cup of coffee.

The best solution would be to have some kind of greenhouse gas dividends. Foot the bill to the polluters. This will cause prices to go up. But if every citizen gets an equal share for pollution produced in their own country and every citizen of EU gets an equal share of imported goods, then the problem will pretty much solve itself.

Of course this system will cost, because surveillance and maintenance isn't free. But the huge advantage is that it gives corporations an incentive to do what they are already doing best: Scale economics. Yeah, there's a bunch of sad sacks that wants more and even more regulations. Also the bunch of sad sacks that wants some kind of revolution. Wich is quite funny, because they can't tell the difference between a generator or a carbureator OR can do a violence.

Here is a rare Greta. Use it only for good.

Should never have existed

>>6692
It's are we worth saving, people would have blow up the planet.
I'm guess your just talking about humans.
Relax, some other people are making up your's and mine's future.
You can always prater H7 N4

>>6717
Love the Greta, thank you

yes

File 167202200322.gif - (0.98MB , 364x243 , ezgif-2-8e5d14a3a0.gif )

>>6692
The earth existed for billions of years before us (and before life for that matter) and will be fine once we go and possibly some more life will take our place in the future. The job of life is to propagate itself existence and if intelligent life turns out to not be good at that then I guess intelligent life wasn't made for the universe and evolutionary will not survive.

It's sad to think about. Such a vast and endless and infinite universe and yet it will be filled with inert objects and indless reproducing life forms....

To answer your question; Yes humanity is worth saving, but, is it possible? Unlikely.

>>6928
where does this gif come from? was that a movie?

>>6929
The ani-matrix.

"Saving"? You know we are only going to make it unable to support us. The Earth will go on. We will not.

File 173881879149.jpg - (58.77KB , 713x601 , guilty.jpg )

Is it worth living in paradise? If the population needs to be reduced to 1% to save this planet for humanity, and that was the only choice, it is worth it. The forerunners have ensured this possibility, at least.

File 173881882560.jpg - (392.12KB , 2385x1268 , Ash.jpg )

Is it worth living in paradise? If the population needs to be reduced to 1% to save this planet for humanity, and that was the only choice, it is worth it. The forerunners have ensured this possibility, at least.

>>6717
After the war ends the rebellion they are going to need to mobilize the underemployed in producing state of the art green energy projects or the nations will fail. Imagine like the Nazis except instead of weapons they make solar panels.

>>7298
Looks like Ash knows exactly what's up. Maybe he can save the world :3

File 174478847342.jpg - (32.88KB , 775x1043 , f.jpg )

civilizations rise and fall, senseless murders, rapes, tortures, psyops or just mere mass-herd mediocre ignorance have been running over and over and over on this planet throughout history, and when you ask "is it worth saving" just remember countless senseless or 'necessary'(if you will) sufferings that have happened for hundreds and thousands of years and the question is meant for every single year - the answer is don't worry about it, nothing needs to "be saved", it all has happened before and usually will happen again, adn most of us are here forever, and another versions of us will be born and run through it all again, roughly same troubles, just different forms, though interestingly we have something quite New and Interesting in the Horizon with the coming technological and the really weirdass shits(you know if you know or you will), so yeah to go back to the question, Don't Worry About "Saving It", that's not really your game here

>>7324
Factor

https://www.vhemt.org/