-  [WT]  [PS]  [Home] [Manage]

[Return]
Posting mode: Reply
  1.   (reply to 24162)
  2. (for post and file deletion)
/rnb/ - Rage and Baww
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG, WEBM
  • Maximum file size allowed is 1000 KB.
  • Images greater than 200x200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 759 unique user posts. View catalog

  • Blotter updated: 2018-08-24 Show/Hide Show All

We are in the process of fixing long-standing bugs with the thread reader. This will probably cause more bugs for a short period of time. Buckle up.

Movies & TV 24/7 via Channel7: Web Player, .m3u file. Music via Radio7: Web Player, .m3u file.

WebM is now available sitewide! Please check this thread for more info.

Teenage Girl 21/10/21(Thu)07:57 No. 24162 ID: 261f4a
24162

File 163479586640.jpg - (45.15KB , 333x333 , 156763516113.jpg )

It's pretty easy for mommy issues ridden fuckboys to whine about women, but consider:

>couldn't open a bank account until 1974
>couldn't serve jury duty until 1968
>couldn't practice law until 1971
>couldn't take birth control until 1965
>could be legally fired for becoming pregnant or going on maternity leave until 1978
>couldn't breastfeed in public in all 50 states until 2018
>couldn't go to ivy leagues until 60s/70s
>couldn't go to west point until 1976
>couldn't run the boston marathon until 1972
>couldn't fight in combat roles until 2013
>couldn't become an astronaut until 1978
>could legally be sexually harassed at work until 1977
>could be legally raped by your husband until 1993
>couldn't get a divorce from your husband if he cheated on you until 1969
>couldn't get a divorce if your husband beat you until 1966
>couldn't get a legal abortion until 1973
>could be discriminated against just for being female until 1964

But sluts, right? And the average "anti-SJW" thinks he's being oppressed because he can't in good faith consume the product of amoral corporations who wouldn't piss on them if they were on fire. And I find it pretty funny how "Gamergate" and "Comicsgate" supporters like to belittle "muh soyboys" and yet their whole raison d'etre revolves around glorified kids toys and kids books respectively. You love to see it.


>>
Teenage Girl 21/11/03(Wed)04:30 No. 24210 ID: 05af12
24210

File 163591024134.png - (241.42KB , 500x501 , image.png )

> Reddit spacing


>>
Teenage Girl 21/11/05(Fri)02:52 No. 24220 ID: 409408

>>24210

>No counter-argument
>Sperging about "Reddit spacing"
>IMAGEBOARDS 'R STILL REAL TO ME, DAMN IT!
>Cuckime picture

Ouch. Better luck next time, kid.


>>
Teenage Girl 22/02/09(Wed)21:32 No. 24441 ID: d216c9

Women shouldn't be able to walk outside without a man either, but here you are complaining.


>>
Teenage Girl 22/02/10(Thu)22:11 No. 24442 ID: 30d65e

All this proves is that the world went to shit around the 70s.


>>
Teenage Girl 22/02/10(Thu)22:14 No. 24443 ID: 75a2bf

>couldn't breastfeed in public in all 50 states until 2018
>couldn't go to ivy leagues until 60s/70s
>couldn't go to west point until 1976
>couldn't run the boston marathon until 1972

>50 States
>Ivy League
>West Point
>Boston Marathon

I think I found your problem, you're living in cuck central.


>>
Teenage Girl 22/02/11(Fri)12:00 No. 24444 ID: 5ac30e
24444

File 164457721939.jpg - (70.46KB , 720x502 , rope.jpg )

Man, the 40s must've been wild. Just smack a bitch!


>>
Teenage Girl 22/02/11(Fri)12:02 No. 24445 ID: 5ac30e
24445

File 164457735522.png - (143.19KB , 1010x1272 , 2004chan.png )

>>24210
>reddit spacing
anon pls

In regards to OP, it is correct that women have had it rough but why do modern women born after 1980 have to prance around like victims?


>>
Teenage Girl 22/02/13(Sun)19:46 No. 24446 ID: ff3844

>>24445

>it is correct that women have had it rough but why do modern women born after 1980 have to prance around like victims?

The same reason men born after the same do: they're millennials. But there's a difference between self-victimization for attention (such as terminally online autists like channers and Redditors do when they can't keep the other site's name outta their mouths) and actually having problems in life.


>>
Teenage Girl 22/02/14(Mon)07:28 No. 24447 ID: 2f8c49

>>24446
>self-victimization for attention
That's what I mean. These people live in a fucking first-world country and act like they have the entire world on their backs.


>>
Teenage Girl 22/02/15(Tue)22:15 No. 24448 ID: 76d8e2

>>24447
This is what happens when you smother the youth with idealism and innocence, lock them away in schools, ban them from dating and working.
They turn out to be terrible adults.


>>
Teenage Girl 22/02/18(Fri)08:24 No. 24449 ID: 4bfece

>>24162
>it used to be hard to be a woman back in the days
>so let's just forget that we raise a whole generation of unecessary men
So there's no wars and monasteries aren't what they used to be. Wat do? Let them stew in their own juices?

But HEEEY! We finally got social justice for the women in the upper middle class! Yey!


>>
Teenage Girl 22/02/28(Mon)23:28 No. 24452 ID: ff3844

>>24449

>So there's no wars and monasteries aren't what they used to be. Wat do? Let them stew in their own juices?

Oh, please, like you wouldn't have tried to get out of fighting in a war or whined that being a monk was boring as shit. Just come out and admit it, faggot, instead of this concern trolling bullshit.


>>
Teenage Girl 22/03/04(Fri)06:59 No. 24454 ID: ef9b0e

The real problem with gender relations is chivalry.
Femininism was NEVER the problem.
In fact, feminism was originally supposed to free women from the tyranny of men playing Mr. Nice Guy.
However, by the 1970s, feminism lost to the powerful force of chivalry.
Chivalry was never about respecting women. All it was about is men trying own women through jackass stunts. Whether it be running errands, showing off your new chariot and inviting an adolescent maiden for a ride, duelling your friends in front of a group of young handmaidens for their entertainment, etc.
Chivalry is Simping.
And it's downright cringey and embarrassing.
What's worse is that any boy whom questions chivalry is automatically branded a sociopath. Any girl whom rejects chivalry is branded a Karen.

The biggest irony is? The idea of chivalry being courteous to women was an afterthought added in the Romanticist era.

Chivalry originally was a glorified syllabus to keep knights from thugging out
All those fairy tale stories about knights being gentlemen are lies. Knights were thugs. They raped the peasant girls, pillaged shops, and probably bullied the local peasant youths.
Not unlike pirates and cowboys.


>>
Teenage Girl 22/03/08(Tue)19:22 No. 24459 ID: ff3844

>>24443

>I think I found your problem, you're living in cuck central.

Says the guy still posting on imageboards that revolve around cuckime.



[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts]



Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason