-  [WT]  [PS]  [Home] [Manage]

[Return]
Posting mode: Reply
  1.   (reply to 24482)
  2. (for post and file deletion)
/rnb/ - Rage and Baww
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG, WEBM
  • Maximum file size allowed is 1000 KB.
  • Images greater than 200x200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 801 unique user posts. View catalog

  • Blotter updated: 2018-08-24 Show/Hide Show All

We are in the process of fixing long-standing bugs with the thread reader. This will probably cause more bugs for a short period of time. Buckle up.

Movies & TV 24/7 via Channel7: Web Player, .m3u file. Music via Radio7: Web Player, .m3u file.

WebM is now available sitewide! Please check this thread for more info.

Teenage Girl 22/03/29(Tue)02:16 No. 24482 ID: ff3844
24482

File 164851299912.png - (457.25KB , 551x551 , sofiamariebakk.png )

Elliot Rodger? Millennial.
Seung-Hi Cho? Millennial.
Adam Lanza? Millennial.
SJWs? Millennials.
"Sex work is real work"? Millennials.
Incels? Millennials,
Femcels? Millennials.
Wokeness? Millennials.
Anti-whiteness? Millennials.
Radfems? Millennials.
Most mass shooters? Millennials.
Most ISIS recruits? Millennials.
Refugees welcome? Millennials.
Brandon Tarrant? Millennial.

Why are millennials always at the forefront of every fucked up thing in society? How did a generation raised on the Attitude Era, classic Simpsons, Beavis and Butthead and the like grow up to be even worse than the religious right?


>>
Teenage Girl 22/03/29(Tue)02:28 No. 24483 ID: ff3844

For all their talk about how bad the religious right was, I don't see them trying to be any better. That's their problem, these millennials. They're emotional and mental cripples. You look up any batshit hot take online or wherever and look up the birth year and there it is: it's a millennial. Try it sometime. Millennials also are behind every destructive force in our culture today. Shitty game devs? Millennials enable them. No one reads anymore? Millennials enable publishers putting out total dross. Everything today is a reboot, retread, whatever? Millennials are the ones demanding it. The millennial cannot create, it can only destroy. And you watch, in a few years, as zoomers take the rest of the spotlight, millennials are gonna get even more batshit insane. The blue checks are gonna start talking about "trans-ageism" and the like. You just watch. Twitter is going to be so much worse when the blue checks have their midlife crises. My hot take is that 10 years from now ageism will be the next big thing as the current blue checks in media/academia get replaced by future zoomer blue checks. Twitter is going to be full of today’s blue checks but even more insufferable due to menopause hormones and the well known decline in happiness in middle age, as well as future zoomer blue checks who will be in an arms race for the most absurd and novel niche identities to get attention/jobs/funding/etc. Millennials will try to play catch up by larping as those identities once they get made up, but zoomers will be given priority in terms of hiring and exposure in media/academia and other industries as they will be the trailblazers of these new oppressed identities, causing an outpouring of millennial rage over not having the spotlight any more, leading to ever more intensely absurd identities being manufactured by millennials to compensate for their increasing invisibility and irrelevance due to age. I also predict that there will be trans-age people, mainly women (as aging will make a bigger difference to the attention they’re used to getting than it will for men), so don’t be surprised when 45 year old women come out as identifying as 22 year olds and demand to be treated as such. Much like pronouns are mentioned in bios today, their bios will mention the year they identify as being born in. And, as it does today, the nonsense from Twitter will permeate other aspects of society, so it won’t be contained there. If you think it’s grim now just you wait. If you thought boomers were bad, millennials will be even worse. I can only imagine the suicide rates once they hit old age and look back at all the shit they wasted their time on.


>>
Teenage Girl 22/03/30(Wed)07:59 No. 24484 ID: 5d431e

>>24482
Because its not the oldest of the millennials that are the problem, its the ones born much closer to 1990 than 1980.


>>
Teenage Girl 22/03/30(Wed)19:04 No. 24485 ID: ff3844

>>24484

I find that hard to believe, considering the birth years of a lot of these so called "influencers" and "agitators" are just as plentiful in the former range as they are in the latter. I have yet to see any boomers, zoomers, Gen-Xers, etc engage in the deliberate attacks on the sociocultural fabric as millennials do. And then millennials pin it all on zoomers. Are there some cringy kids out there? Sure, but name me a single zoomer who has done anything comparable to anyone on my list. You can't.

The boomers were right all along. Millennials really can't amount to anything, and they can't even be funny about it too like Randall and Dante were.


>>
Teenage Girl 22/04/09(Sat)05:48 No. 24503 ID: 51e493

Believe it or not the world was always full of shitty people doing shitty things.

There's no landmark, it's a continuous stream of shit that goes back to the beginning of human evolution.


>>
Teenage Girl 22/04/10(Sun)21:37 No. 24513 ID: ff3844

>>24503

>Believe it or not the world was always full of shitty people doing shitty things.

That's true, but millennials like to act like they're immune from this, that it's everyone else but 'em doing it, and if you dare point what you just said out to them, they think you're problematic or anti-white. And that's why I post what I post about them. Because millennials are insufferable. They don't create, only imitate. They don't contribute anything. Gen Z has Greta/student walkouts, Boomers had 'Nam protests/May 1968, Gen X has OWS. And what do millennials have? Comparing everything to Harry Potter and whining about how you can't see little girl panties on a kids' toy...I mean, a video game anymore?


>>
Teenage Girl 22/04/27(Wed)03:58 No. 24550 ID: 31abfb

>>24513
There's a reason millennials are called Generation Y.
Y as in "WHY?"
"Why do I have to adult?"
"Why boomers do this?"
"Why do zoomers do that?"
Millennials are called Gen Y because all they know is to ask "Why?"
They don't bother to fix the why. They don't wanna.
Adulting is the curse of living for them.


>>
transageism Teenage Girl 22/05/01(Sun)05:19 No. 24551 ID: 29fa1b

>>24483
that trans-ageism thought...im gonna lock that back in my brain noodle and see how accurate your prediction is in 10 years. Im pretty sure youll be 44billion % accurate.


>>
Teenage Girl 22/05/01(Sun)14:15 No. 24552 ID: 47f8a4

>>24551
We already have trans-age people. Middle age people saying they identify as elementary schoolers.
Mind you, the trans craze isn't exclusively millennials, although they did push it to he forefront and will deny it.


>>
Teenage Girl 22/05/07(Sat)07:12 No. 24557 ID: b4258c
24557

File 165190035497.png - (52.29KB , 350x347 , 159740532718.png )

>>24552

>Mind you, the trans craze isn't exclusively millennials, although they did push it to he forefront and will deny it.

Millennials are always doing this. Go on any rightoid site (Kiwi Farms, 4chan, etc) and you'll see countless millennials insisting it's all Gen Z who started all this shit, nevermind it was millennials who created Tumblr et al. It's pic related, basically. Millennials are guilty of cultural gentrification 'cause they can't create a goddamn thing that isn't le milquetoast, inoffensive PC for the sake of PC shit or glorified cunny/shitposting that's as long and pretentious as Infinite Jest. Seriously, name five great millennial movies, novels, whatever.

You can't. You just can't.


>>
Teenage Girl 22/05/07(Sat)12:58 No. 24558 ID: 9b2a6e

>>24551
I think shit's gonna get real grim 10 years from now, when all these "identities" millennials have adopted start to crumble. How long can all these trans-whatever retards keep up the charade before they finally realize it just doesn't work?


>>
Teenage Girl 22/05/07(Sat)19:38 No. 24560 ID: dfea78

>>24558

>How long can all these trans-whatever retards keep up the charade before they finally realize it just doesn't work?

You could say the exact same thing about you imageboard dorks. How long can you be based and redpilled before you finally realize you wasted your prime years on trying to own random people you'll never meet? It goes both ways, and you're all gonna end up on the same policeman's blotter when you blow your brains out after shitting one too many diapers when you're 50+ and you realize what you've done.


>>
Teenage Girl 22/05/24(Tue)02:56 No. 24590 ID: b5f341

>even worse than the religious right
The religious right is still fucking it up for everyone abusing their positions of power in the government and corporations.


>>
Teenage Girl 22/05/26(Thu)02:01 No. 24596 ID: 6f8a99

>>24590
>I'm a huge fucking commmunist and everybody who's not even dumber than I am is what's stopping the glorious revolution


>>
Teenage Girl 22/09/17(Sat)20:51 No. 25253 ID: f1db12

>>24596
Since when is criticizing the religious right a commie thing?
And why do you think communism means transgenderism and antimasculinity?


>>
Teenage Girl 22/09/19(Mon)23:38 No. 25256 ID: e67d3b

>>25253

>why do you think communism means transgenderism and antimasculinity?

Simple orders from above told them.


>>
Teenage Girl 22/09/20(Tue)04:52 No. 25257 ID: dd09ae

>>25253
I take it you have missed all the examples shown of the modern communists? Also who was the one to flood the schools with LGBT and race mixing propaganda?


>>
Teenage Girl 22/09/22(Thu)09:48 No. 25263 ID: 864809

>>25257
Apparently another brainwashed neocon whose never studied Marx, Lenin, Stalin.

No, SJWism isn't communism. If you read basic history about communism, you'd realize they're more closer the ideal of conservatives than conservatives themselves.

Marx believed in firearms for all civilians. Marx believed in overthrowing tyranny.
Stalin and Lenin thought reformation and labor for prisoners was a must.

Meanwhile, the good liberal North America thinks reform and labor for prisoners is bad.
They think people having guns, cars, houses need to have license and tax.

Americans talk about freedom, yet they cannot fathom the thought of forming their own communes and growing their own food and making their products like the Amish. No, they'd rather rely on government and corporations.


>>
Teenage Girl 22/09/22(Thu)09:51 No. 25264 ID: 864809

>>25257
Also, if you think race mixing is inherently bad, Itake it you never studied real history, let alone had a ancestry test.

Alot of your renowned patriarchs race mixed.
Race wasn't even seen as a matter of skin color. It was more about tongue and tribe.


>>
Teenage Girl 22/09/22(Thu)16:47 No. 25265 ID: dd09ae

>>25264
You must be European. The races that mixed in the pass were all 1 race but considered different at the time. They're all white, they're all European. Or, they're all Arab, or they're all East Asian.

Now it's low IQ shitskin with a European or East Asian. The low IQ shitskins have been breeding for centuries to make their modern product as are the Europeans and East Asians. When these all mixed it makes mutants and the brown slogs.

History was never like this. 100,000,000 niggers didn't come pollute a home of 35,000,000 non-niggers. I swear to fuck you commies don't see what's going on and pull out examples from the past in your arguments for transexual bullshit and miscegenation and think they apply to now.


>>
Teenage Girl 22/09/23(Fri)16:53 No. 25269 ID: d8ac5f

>>25263
Americans have frequently formed their own communes in the past. This is entirely possible under our system of freedom. What on earth could you possibly be talking about?


>>
Teenage Girl 22/09/24(Sat)19:57 No. 25277 ID: f0ac70

>>25265

>you must be European

Nice way of outing yourself as a dumb Amercan, which BTW is racemixed for four centuries.
You really don't know much about history do you?
Even bkacks and East Asians frequently integrated with the Mediterranean folks.

Also, "you commies", you mean neolibs. Because communism never cared about idol.


I think you're kust another passive aggressive sheltered "white" boy whom has failed at life without even trying.

Cope. Seethe. Dilate.


>>
Teenage Girl 22/09/24(Sat)21:18 No. 25279 ID: dd09ae

>>25277
bait


>>
Teenage Girl 22/09/24(Sat)22:44 No. 25280 ID: 61ba65

>>25277
Nobody cares. Go start your own commune or move to the EUSSR. Oh, the EUSSR isn't taking? Put shoe paint on you face.

Link to your subscribe channel so we can watch how nice your life is.


>>
Teenage Girl 22/10/21(Fri)05:08 No. 25341 ID: d09366

>>25269
Keyword: in the past.
Nowadays? Try forming your own commune and see what happens.
You get thrown in jail for "trespassing".


>>
Teenage Girl 22/10/21(Fri)16:52 No. 25342 ID: 049bc8

>>25341
Only if you do it on someone else's land, dipshit. Pool your money and buy some cheap rural land and get a lawyer to set you up with a contract for shared ownership that fits your goals, it will be fine.


>>
Teenage Girl 22/10/23(Sun)02:13 No. 25343 ID: d09366

>>25342
Not even on someone's private property.
In the woods, away from houses or parks, if you're found out having a commune, you get thrown in jail for "trespassing."

Even abandoned houses that haven't been brought by any realtors.


>>
Teenage Girl 22/10/23(Sun)02:46 No. 25344 ID: 049bc8

>>25343
What you've described is literally someone's private property, it's just private property without an owner that is actively exercising control over it. You don't have a legal right to just grab any land that isn't being guarded, that would defeat the whole point of the system. There is, of course, an exception in adverse possession, but I'm willing to bet you don't know what that is.

Land out west is cheap as hell, even free in a few niche situations. Just go out and make it happen instead of whining about there not being a perfect opportunity to do it like your ridiculous fantasy version where you steal from 'the man'. Or better yet, just join an existing commune.


>>
Teenage Girl 22/10/27(Thu)16:21 No. 25354 ID: 43e318

>>25344
So you're saying that undeveloped land that hasn't been claimed by realty groups is private property?
That's your justification?

No wonder people are so cucked.


>>
Teenage Girl 22/10/27(Thu)19:14 No. 25355 ID: 049bc8

>>25354
Yeah, I'm saying it because it's literally how the system works. It's just a fact, no justifying required.
>that hasn't been claimed by realty groups
lmao you have no idea of the very basics of this. The system is not run by "realty groups", they're just a middle man who handles the transactions. Abandoned houses are not 'no mans land' in the way you seem to imagine them, they are usually still owned by whoever had them to begin with, or their heirs. If they don't pay the taxes on it then it will eventually be reclaimed by the government, who will decide what to do with it (usually, they will sell it).

At no point do you personally have a right to take it for free, not unless you go through the long and arduous process of adverse possession (which, again, you don't know anything about).


>>
Teenage Girl 22/10/28(Fri)18:08 No. 25358 ID: c1af1d

>>25355
I said UNDEVELOPED. As in, natural land that hasn't had any houses or businesses or plants built on it.

Not mere abandoned property.


>>
Teenage Girl 22/10/28(Fri)20:01 No. 25359 ID: 049bc8

>>25358
We were clearly talking about abandoned houses. But as for undeveloped land, some of it belongs to private owners who bought it as an investment are more than happy to sell it to you and your (non-existent) buddies for pretty low price, and some of it is public land and is open for temporary camping but you can't live there permanently as it would take it away from the rest of the public. It's also worth mentioning that a lot of undeveloped land is still being used, just not very noticeably (grazing).


>>
Teenage Girl 22/10/30(Sun)15:00 No. 25362 ID: 946ae6

>>25359
Living on government-owned land depends on the kind of government you have. It doesn't depend on it "taking away" from the rest of the public. It depends on what the laws are. It also depends on the going standard of law enforcement. Sometimes law enforcement officers are under orders to not enforce certain laws, and a person would not face any consequences until some other law is violated and the judicial system is brought in to the mix.


>>
Teenage Girl 22/10/30(Sun)20:12 No. 25363 ID: 049bc8

>>25362
>It doesn't depend on it "taking away" from the rest of the public. It depends on what the laws are.
Yeah, obviously. I was just explaining the rationale for the law, but the cold facts remain the same whether or not you agree with that rationale: you cannot just build a house on public land without permission, and this is the sort of law that will actually be enforced if the government catches wind of it. The government is pretty lazy and selective about enforcing the more interesting laws everyone loves to talk about (drugs, weapons, sex, even violence), but they will almost automatically enforce any laws that uphold the structure of the system, such as property rights and taxes. It's just self-preservation.


>>
Teenage Girl 22/11/01(Tue)13:09 No. 25365 ID: 946ae6

>>25363
There are people doing exactly this in san fran, except with a lot more flair and style than your typical bums.

t. sometimes hang out with local bums. The cops don't care as long as it's mostly out of sight.


>>
Teenage Girl 22/11/01(Tue)13:52 No. 25366 ID: 049bc8

>>25365
There are indeed hilarious exceptions to this rule in lefty areas, just makes the point that this kid could basically go out and live his dream but conveniently is only willing to in the few ways that happen to not be available.



[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts]



Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason