-  [WT]  [PS]  [Home] [Manage]
[ 7ch / ch7 / irc ] [ VIP / civ ] [ 777 / b / banner / fl / gfx / ? / :F::a::I::L: ] [ co / eh / fit / halp / jew / lit / phi / pr / rnb / sci / tg / w / zom ] [ a / ai / grim / hi / me / rx / vg / wp / x ] [ cake / cd / d / di / elit / fag / fur / gif / h / men / pco / s / sm / ss / unf ]
[Return]
Posting mode: Reply
  3.   (reply to 15363)
  6. (for post and file deletion)
/w/ - Weapons
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG, WEBM
  • Maximum file size allowed is 5120 KB.
  • Images greater than 200x200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 630 unique user posts. View catalog

  • Blotter updated: 2018-08-24 Show/Hide Show All

We are in the process of fixing long-standing bugs with the thread reader. This will probably cause more bugs for a short period of time. Buckle up.

Movies & TV 24/7 via Channel7: Web Player, .m3u file. Music via Radio7: Web Player, .m3u file.

WebM is now available sitewide! Please check this thread for more info.
Can a tank have wheels? Sarah Palin 17/02/09(Thu)07:44 No. 15363
15363

File 148662265848.jpg - (89.63KB , 800x570 , wheeled tank.jpg )

I'm arguing with my friend whether a tank can have wheels or not and what makes a tank a tank.

He's saying in order for a tank to be a tank it has to have a tracked chassis as the main determining factor.

I say it just determines on what its role is. As in a bulky armored vehicle.

I suppose this also goes into the argument of what differentiates a tank from an APC.

Also if a tank is simply determined by treads what about future prototype tanks that only have legs?

Tanks clearly can have more than just treads in my opinion but I suppose i'll let you guys argue about it.

http://www.strawpoll.me/12300143/ (embed)

Here's the strawpoll.


>>
Sarah Palin 18/06/08(Fri)04:27 No. 15429

>>15363
What you have pictured is an armored car.


>>
Sarah Palin 18/12/17(Mon)16:59 No. 15464

>>15363
your supposed tank w/ legs would not be tank

I'd call it a crawler or armored walker


>>
Sarah Palin 18/12/28(Fri)19:29 No. 15465

Convertible drives were utilized on tanks due to poor continuous track construction during WW2. Predominantly with tanks using Christie suspension. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christie_suspension


>>
Sarah Palin 19/01/27(Sun)03:28 No. 15469

Armored assault chassis were nicknamed "tanks" because the early models looked like big fluid tanks.

In other languages, they are usually called the equivalent of "assault chariot".


>>
You are (probably) wrong Guy that knows stuff 19/02/26(Tue)01:06 No. 15474
15474

File 155113956975.jpg - (9.28KB , 259x194 , Armored Car.jpg )

Tanks were made with tracks and the first armored vehicles that were called "tanks" were tracked.A "tank" with WHEELS would be called an armored car or SPG,And if the gun is big enough a Tank Destroyer,but certainly not a tank.


>>
Sarah Palin 19/07/30(Tue)20:35 No. 15490

Both Merriam Webster and Cambridge define a tank as requiring treads. You have to be careful with Cambridge's definition, since the wording is a little wonky.


>>
Sarah Palin 19/08/05(Mon)14:16 No. 15491

No, the tank is defined by the tracks, armor and cannon. The word for a vehicle with tracks but less armor and no cannon of a tank, is "armored fighting vehicle".


>>
Sarah Palin 22/08/24(Wed)12:29 No. 15639
15639

File 166133698722.jpg - (303.50KB , 1920x1080 , aamt (10).jpg )

>>15363
Tanks have tracks and a big gun


>>
Sarah Palin 22/08/24(Wed)22:12 No. 15640

>>15639
The best tanks actually flies in the air. It's a flying gun.


>>
Sarah Palin 22/09/22(Thu)16:49 No. 15663

>>15640
A10? It’s not a tank…


>>
Sarah Palin 22/09/22(Thu)17:08 No. 15664

>>15663
You're right, it is a little honey bee.


>>
Sarah Palin 23/03/21(Tue)10:30 No. 15688
15688

File 167939103250.jpg - (114.53KB , 962x722 , 3.jpg )

No tanks.
Source: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4996388/WWII-tank-photos-revealed-amazing-colour.html



[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts]

Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason