-  [WT]  [PS]  [Home] [Manage]
[ 7ch / ch7 / irc ] [ VIP / civ ] [ 777 / b / banner / fl / gfx / ? / :F::a::I::L: ] [ co / eh / fit / halp / jew / lit / phi / pr / rnb / sci / tg / w / zom ] [ a / ai / grim / hi / me / rx / vg / wp / x ] [ cake / cd / d / di / elit / fag / fur / gif / h / men / pco / s / sm / ss / unf ]
[Return]
Posting mode: Reply
  3.   (reply to 4824)
  6.   Help
  7. (for post and file deletion)
/zom/ - Zombies

Welcome back.

Standard rules apply, stay on-topic, and keep posting.


  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG, SWF, WEBM
  • Maximum file size allowed is 8192 KB.
  • Images greater than 200x200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 1181 unique user posts. View catalog

  • Blotter updated: 2018-08-24 Show/Hide Show All

We are in the process of fixing long-standing bugs with the thread reader. This will probably cause more bugs for a short period of time. Buckle up.

Movies & TV 24/7 via Channel7: Web Player, .m3u file. Music via Radio7: Web Player, .m3u file.

WebM is now available sitewide! Please check this thread for more info.
Shambler 13/10/04(Fri)16:37 No. 4824 ID: 5d5bc0
4824

File 138089743418.png - (80.06KB , 418x198 , WWL.png )

I finally got an opportunity to watch WWZ last night, and, yes, I was disappointed. Anybody else feel that the movie was a wasted opportunity to tell a great story, bore remarkably little resemblance to the superb novel, and spent far, FAR too much time delving into the angst and showcasing the nobility of Brad Pitt's boringly conventional, formulaic character?


>>
Martyn Grim 13/10/05(Sat)08:30 No. 4825 ID: 435599
4825

File 138095461967.png - (84.83KB , 397x400 , Peter-Griffin-psd30524.png )

Well sir while I may not agree with your opinions, I will defend tot he death your right to have them.


>>
Shambler 13/10/07(Mon)22:55 No. 4828 ID: 33d59f

I think they "Transformers-ed" it, if you will. It was very flashy and entertaining, but after seeing it, I could remember the scenes of zombie waves ten times as well as I could remember any aspect of the plot. It was all about flashy entertainment. It's up to the viewer to decide if that's necessarily a bad thing.


>>
Shambler 13/10/08(Tue)22:20 No. 4829 ID: 5d5bc0

OP here, and I can't say that the movie wasn't entertaining on a certain level. My primary point is that it WASN'T World War Z; it did not resemble the novel at all. Don't get me wrong; I have seen MUCH WORSE zombie flicks (as we all have, I am sure). My disappointment stems from the fact that I really enjoyed the Brooks novel, and thus had inflated expectations for the movie. I enjoyed watching it, but I also enjoyed watching 'Tokyo Zombie' and 'Strippers Vs. Zombies'; neither had the budget or effects of WWZ, but both were good for a lot of laughs, and Brad Pitt's flick certainly didn't have very many of those.


>>
Shambler 13/10/09(Wed)00:29 No. 4830 ID: 4f15e1
4830

File 138127136682.jpg - (249.98KB , 658x725 , 1377806819244.jpg )


>>
Shambler 13/11/03(Sun)06:50 No. 4875 ID: 687488
4875

File 13834578099.jpg - (73.20KB , 450x577 , ad13[1].jpg )

>>4830
What are these weird symbols?


>>
World War Z Luis Gardner 13/11/08(Fri)20:56 No. 4880 ID: 1fa12e

Well, I think it was a realistic movie, bur you're right it's not a great movie. I'd rather watch 28 months movie.



[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts]

Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason