画像ファイル名 172468302041.jpg - (225.79KB , 800x600 , BLQ_44884.jpg )

画像ファイル名 172468303843.jpg - (257.67KB , 841x1262 , BLQ57759.jpg )

画像ファイル名 172468306169.jpg - (199.46KB , 800x800 , 7626.jpg )

画像ファイル名 172468307691.jpg - (398.74KB , 1500x1000 , BLQ_7654.jpg )

画像ファイル名 172468316561.jpg - (0.96MB , 1409x2113 , j7b_034.jpg )

画像ファイル名 172951230582.jpg - (231.24KB , 933x1400 , BLQ_5333.jpg )

画像ファイル名 172951232145.jpg - (268.82KB , 1536x864 , BLQ_5320.jpg )

画像ファイル名 173127549851.jpg - (257.61KB , 1920x1080 , BLQ11201.jpg )

画像ファイル名 173515149638.jpg - (81.64KB , 901x534 , BLQ6861.jpg )

It's just shit hitting the lens at peculiar angles, these kinds of porn shots are done with professional lighting setups. Get a candid photo and observe no "rib rays"

Guy coming up with a magnetic field psychic E edgy theory and not even considering the enormous lightbulbs that get carted onto porn shoots and aimed square at the woman's tits and pussies.

>>7907
>7906
If you look back through some of the pictures you can see candid> images that have these things. The original poster also hired a model and shot his own images I guess without lighting etc, how you explain that?

>>7908

I can see porn, porn, porn, porn and one pap of Britney Spears, all of it of course having been shooped before public release

I looked at the photo he took and I think it's sunlight and/or effects caused by post processing

This reminds me of when people were trying to convince me halos are real by showing photos of too sharp JPGs causing errors and strangeness

Moreover this experiment they ran was not serious. Why did they not have the model change position right away, to see if the energy rays changed too? Why did they not take photos before she arrived, while she was fully clothed, wearing cotton, wearing leather, wearing plastic? Why did he not show the result when taking photo of a man? Or with the camera at a 90° angle to the previous position? And more especially, why did they make the model play with her pussy like that? OP admits himself it was a "treat" to see titties irl. Run out of time for more serious things? I question OPs intent and professionalism.

This is the definition of psuedoscience... There's no comparison, there's no repetition. So how can it possible rule out confounding factors?

This isn't experimenting to see if the sky is blue or chickens lay eggs, this is a crazy hypothesis so you need some crazy evidence to support it. And porn shoots, pap shots and an excuse to touch yourself isn't enough.

>>7910
Hello Anonymous, I don't think the original poster is trying to prove anything he is asking questions about the things he's seen.
I have to admit I do believe in other things that we can't explain and I believe we women are special. It been know since ancient times that women are connected with mother Earth and have special relationship with her.
I think what dark has done here is highlight this.

Just thought I'd leave this here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgL61TJBFbQ

画像ファイル名 175242462960.jpg - (358.54KB , 1439x1077 , BLQ_5525.jpg )

画像ファイル名 175242476338.jpg - (261.59KB , 1067x1520 , 1765.jpg )

Yes

画像ファイル名 177093279671.jpg - (257.34KB , 922x1112 , BLQ9956.jpg )

画像ファイル名 177093284450.jpg - (304.64KB , 1536x1152 , 4827.jpg )

画像ファイル名 17709328733.jpg - (57.34KB , 768x576 , B5128.jpg )

画像ファイル名 177093290936.jpg - (73.11KB , 768x576 , B5129.jpg )

画像ファイル名 177461400597.jpg - (453.12KB , 1020x1533 , 1174.jpg )

画像ファイル名 177461403979.jpg - (409.13KB , 1510x1152 , 1627.jpg )

画像ファイル名 177461406854.jpg - (777.28KB , 2691x1800 , 9324.jpg )

画像ファイル名 177461455615.jpg - (253.59KB , 1920x1080 , 177.jpg )

画像ファイル名 177487990826.jpg - (263.80KB , 1280x720 , 9334.jpg )

画像ファイル名 178058966946.jpg - (391.52KB , 2384x800 , 5525.jpg )

>>7906
Hello,

In answer to your statement, yes, it could be light produced by the sun, interior/exterior lighting, etc. But from what I've observed, the very precise alignment of the beams, flares, and bubbles, in my view, rules that theory out.
Lens flares, for example, usually align with the point source of light and are pretty predictable.
I've even run images containing many lens flares through the computer using the same settings and sensitivities, but what appears in the final image is exactly what is in the original. (See Attached)
The beams and bubbles that appear in these images do not align with a point source of light; rather, they are perfectly aligned with the model's tits, or in the case of bubbles, are often seen drifting randomly around the model. Moreover, these structures do not appear in the visible image as flares do and only show up via deep image processing.

The admittedly amateurish study that Thomas and I have done with our own model proved that whatever is appearing on images of these women has something to do with electromagnetism, and/or the interaction of the women and the planet's magnetic field.

I had been promoted out of the department where I was able to use the instruments and computers, so my investigations had to cease. However, I've since returned to the department (in part thanks to Donald Trump!), and I'm able to use the equipment again. It's had several upgrades since I last used it, and it's now more sensitive, detecting elements such as argon, Nitrogen, and Oxygen. It's also been enhanced with A.I., so it takes care of some of the work I'm unable to do manually. I'm still not authorised to use this "officially", so my postings here will be on a when-able basis.

So, I revisited the well-known photo shoot that Eufrant did in some woods and in an abandoned building, as the outburst she had here seemed very vivid when I last processed these images. I use this particular model to study because of the many hundreds that I've looked at over the last 5 years; she is the most consistent in producing bright beams and bubbles. Also, I think many cameras at this time began to be able to capture many wavelengths of light other than the standard RGB.

Hopefully, with the following images, I can convince you that what appears in the images is not only real, but is 100% associated with the model and not an artefact caused by the camera lens or lighting.

画像ファイル名 178065691366.jpg - (885.91KB , 2884x1080 , ruin.jpg )

>>7785

This image was taken a few frames after post #7785 and is a wider view of the area around Eufrat. In the earlier post, I had to overexpose most of it in order to highlight the extremely faint details.
In this image, the features are more clearly seen without the need for so much processing. The "Bubble" that can be seen expanding away from Eufrat in the first image at around 8-10ft distant appears to have expanded in the second image, some 8 seconds later, to around 20ft, suggesting an expansion rate of around 1ft per second.
The very bright bubble that is behind Eufrat in the first image, connected by a luminous tail, is not present in the second image. However, there are numerous bubbles in this image (I count at least 5!) and so could be any one of these. Why it initially appeared so bright is again unknown.
As the initial large bubble expanded outwards, so has the area of mist that envelopes the entire area. This has no structure and appears almost like a cloud or mist.
With the newer imaging technology, I can now count at least 9 beams pointing in different directions, but all originating from a single point source. This point source moves up and down the stairs that Eufrat is standing on, and originates from the same area and height that her tits occupied, or did occupy.
Again, if these beams were lens flares, they would point back to the source of light that created them and not to a single person.

画像ファイル名 178065873152.jpg - (390.27KB , 1441x1080 , ter.jpg )

This image shows beams emerging from Eufrat's tits, as well as criss-crossing the entire image. Again all these secondary beams originate from where Eufrat was standing. They appear much clearer now, as A.I. can enhance more than what I was able to do originally, and I'm now confident that they are indeed "ghost" artefacts rather than images.
I say this because even though the camera moves position, the beams do not.
This firmly rules out the possibility that the features are images embedded in the camera sensor data as they would appear in the same place on the image frame. These remain anchored in the same place regardless of the camera's position, and so must be actual physical remnants of the beams.

This image also shows the remarkable swirling effect on her right breast and subtly glowing rib structure. I had to greatly over-enhance this area when I last examined these pictures just to show these features as they were so dim. Again, I'm now more confident than ever that these are all part of the dynamic that creates the beams.

are you schitzo?

>>7987
Yes, but what is your excuse?

画像ファイル名 17808501823.jpg - (389.58KB , 1441x1078 , turna.jpg )

More "ghost" beams criss-crossing these images, and always remining static despite the wind. Some appear to end in sharp right angles, or follow the arcs of expanding bubbles. But, why they do this, I'm not at all sure.
They can last up to several minutes after they have been formed and more often than not become wider before eventually fading away.
The best explanation I have is that they are possibly held by the Earth's magnetic field if they are indeed connected to some sort of electromagnetism. That would explain why they do not drift in the wind as smoke does.

画像ファイル名 178085020678.jpg - (432.16KB , 1439x1080 , klam3.jpg )

画像ファイル名 178085078223.jpg - (413.65KB , 1442x1080 , 121.jpg )

>>7990
Something to note in the above image is that the new A.I. higher resolution images you can now see swirling either on the surface of, or just under the skin of her breasts that converges on the nipples.
In addition to this swirling pattern, the rib cage is also glowing. This isn't so distinctive with Eufrat, as her rib cage is not easily seen. But other models with prominent rib cages show this feature really well.

画像ファイル名 178085085722.jpg - (400.01KB , 1442x1068 , flair.jpg )

>>7990
>>7299
>>7314
>>7320
>>7338
>>7320
>>7317

>>7995
It's interesting that you posted Thomas's post (#7338), as I went to see him only three weeks ago. Unfortunately, he had a stroke last year, which has made him virtually housebound now, but we still talk about this even though he is unable to use a computer as much as he did.
We were planning on hiring our model again last year before his illness, but my work got in the way, too, so we never managed it.
A few have questioned our work regarding the model, claiming it was not scientific enough. But, that's the problem, neither of us are sientists!
Our investigations are amateurish at best, but the results we obtained, with relatively simple equipment, proved that what we are seeing is most likely real.

画像ファイル名 178144815478.jpg - (119.53KB , 465x700 , BLQ_0097.jpg )

Continuing with the recent images I processed, I found that the model called Cikita displayed some very interesting features. These features are also seen with Eufrat, but due to the size of Cikita's tits, these become more evident.
In the following images, you can see very distinct swirling around the breasts, clockwise on the right, and anticlockwise on the left. This energy converges on the nipples and areolas, where it is then ejected from the body in beams.

However, the interesting thing with Cikita is that she has an inverted nipple on the left breast, and so quite often no beam is seen coming from this breast, even though there is on the right.

In the following picture, you can see a normal beam on her right breast, but what appears to be helical waves travelling away from the inverted nipple on the left.
Also, in these and the following images, you can see her ribs glowing at the same wavelength as the beams from her body. This is prominent because she has a very well-defined rib structure that is not covered by much body fat.

画像ファイル名 178144864496.jpg - (370.77KB , 1165x1746 , 0076.jpg )

画像ファイル名 178144975261.jpg - (3.62MB , 3744x5616 , 0145.jpg )

Cikita, from what I can tell, produces these swirls long before any beams begin to appear. However, they only become symmetrical and spiral in nature just before an outburst. Preceding this, thin converging lines appear and either spread out from the areolas or converge into them. It could be an indication of a tightening electrical field.

The following three images show this swirling in the absence of any beams. The last image shows the radiating lines as well as a developing "bubble".

画像ファイル名 178144979093.jpg - (1.05MB , 2337x3471 , 0146.jpg )

画像ファイル名 178144981633.jpg - (159.03KB , 1920x1080 , 0151.jpg )

画像ファイル名 17840421774.jpg - (718.41KB , 1821x852 , 8398.jpg )

Another three images that show how fascinating Cikita's physiology is. All three of these images show how the flow through her right breast is symmetrical, yet the flow through her left is more turbulent.
In these instances, she is often seen with a perfectly normal beam emitting from the right breast, but nothing from the left, although sometimes, she'll still have an indistinct beam from the left, suggesting that a magnetic field is still present.

It should be noted that Cikita's outbursts last longer than any other models I've studied so far. Whether this is a direct result of her effectively only having one perfectly functioning breast is unknown. I still have many hours of her movies and pictures to process and I hope that something will help me to resolve this puzzle.

>>7907
To clarify. The machine I have "access" to uses hyperspectral analysis as part of its process. No, I'm not qualified "officially" to use it. And yes, I have to run these images through Photoshop to make the structures visible after processing, otherwise you still wouldn't see them.

画像ファイル名 178404417980.jpg - (453.69KB , 1278x1490 , 1645.jpg )

>>7286
In these two images, again, we see normal flow in the breast with the normal nipple, but irregular flow in the breast with the inverted nipple.
It appears that the entire breast is affected by the nipple being inverted, so it (the nipple) must play an important part in draining electromagnetic energy from the body.
In the lower image, lighter areas can be seen in the spiral bands, almost as though there is some stuttering in the flow.

I'm pretty sure that shape is more important than size in a woman's breasts, and I believe that it plays a critical part in determining whether she will produce these beams, as I've not seen any women with truly huge breasts producing them. Maria Swan, Zuzana Drabinova, Viola Baileys, Ewa Sonnet, just to name a few, have incredibly large breasts, and yet I've never seen any activity being produced by them.

画像ファイル名 178447976049.jpg - (294.14KB , 1000x1500 , 0012a.jpg )

The other thing that separates Cikita from many other beam-producing women is the number of bubbles she produces. Although I've noted these with every woman I've studied, Cikita and probably Adele Stephens produce an extraordinarily large number of them before an outburst.
In this image, five can be seen despite it being a relatively tight shot.

画像ファイル名 178448114395.jpg - (377.33KB , 1536x864 , 2120SAG3.jpg )

I took this image and processed it in the usual way, then ran it through Gigapixel AI in an attempt to fetch out the details.
Although it looks A.I.- enhanced, I think what remains is a very haunting-looking image that is dominated by almost a dozen bubbles of varying sizes and intensities.
These structures exist probably 100-150nm below that of the beams even when first produced. I still haven't worked out how or why they are produced or how they interact with either the female or the surrounding magnetic field, if they are indeed magnetic and not some biological "soap bubble" produced by them.

Again, the right breast appears to be very active, shooting very well-defined beams that leave clear ghost images, and her rib structure is also brought out well. The left breast, although producing a swirling pattern across it, is not emitting any kind of activity, and I'm not sure if all the bubbles that have been produced were produced by the right breast alone.

Saw this and thought you might find it interesting. Not about breasts generating electrical energy, but their motion.

https://www.rediff.com/getahead/report/bra/20080717.htm