I need more information to help you:
Are your friends local or remote? (aka are they with you at home or are they at there homes)

iptables masquerading

>>3786

Thanks

>>3789
apache and sql

>>3789
>It's old, therefore useless and no one should use it!
This makes no sense at all.

I'm looking at it but I cant quite figure out why or what this does. at first I thought it was looking for every occurance of myName, but that doesnt seem to be the case, it just looks like it finds every occurance of J and then pushes the next characters the length of myname.

its a bit confusing.

anyways, what happens here is the reason it takes myName.length + i is because its using that as an index of where to seek the string "text", if you had just done myName.length it would never be able to complete past the length of myName because the "i" variable would be passed the length.

essentially, it could be written the same way as

indeed, that may even be a bit more concise, as it explains that its pushing the text at the index of j + i.

there is a major problem with this, though. if the string has less characters at the end of the string that exists in myName, your program will crash, as the index of the string will be out of bounds.

so, it might be safer to say

Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>3869
Ohh, so if the string's last bit was ...eliJh", it would crash.
makes sense.

"if you had just done myName.length it would never be able to complete past the length of myName because the "i" variable would be passed the length."

or if i just put in myName.length, it would try to take the first 4 letters of the string itself, since j is dependent upon i in this instance where j = i?

the following code spits out [J, o, d, i]

var text = "Jodi hello Jodi hello hello Jeff hello hello \
hello Jeff hello hello hello";
var myName = "Jeff";
var hits = [];
for(var i = 0; i < text.length; i++) {
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>3870
what language is this anyway? pretty much any language has built in string comparisons and most modern languages have regex support that can help with things like this.

Yes, there is an alternative: don't use this jew-created vulnerability-ridden insecure nuisance of a language. The kikes have created PHP in order to enslave the goys who don't have the brains not to use it.

(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

>>3841

..wow

>>3841

Hi nikita!

Actually he is right, don't use fucking php. It is broken:

The bugs, won't fix list:

https://bugs.php.net/search.php?cmd=display&search_for=&project=&php_os=&php_os_not=&author_email=&bug_type=Bug&boolean=0&bug_age=0&bug_updated=0&order_by=php_version&direction=DESC&limit=30&phpver=&c
ve_id=&cve_id_not=&patch=&pull=&assign=&status=Wont+fix&begin=150

The bugs, not a bug list:
https://bugs.php.net/search.php?cmd=display&search_for=&project=&php_os=&php_os_not=&author_email=&bug_type=Bug&boolean=0&bug_age=0&bug_updated=0&order_by=php_version&direction=DESC&limit=30&phpver=5&
cve_id=&cve_id_not=&patch=&pull=&assign=&status=Not+a+bug&begin=90

Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>3842

which arguments, argv?

I think shift automatically takes arguments from argv, but only if its outside of a subroutine.

if perl recognizes main as I think you want it to, I'm not sure, but you could remove the main sub entirely and enter:

this is probably what you're looking for. this will take the first variable off of the default stack (or argv depending on where you use it) and input it into the variable, however if the stack has nothing in it, it will use the default value to the right.

another option is to kill the program:


Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>3843
i need to pull my shit together...

all in all, there's many ways to go about this. lets say you wanted to parse it,

File 136982787544.png - (331.33KB , 813x936 , math.png )

>>3832
I mean when you are academic, it is like your papers are write only: you write your papers and there are very few people that read them - impact is very little; I felt like a vegetarian butcher, teaching software engineering, I've no clue what I was teaching about, because I never wrote a practical program, I never experienced how people really build software, so it really was theory and I din't felt I was really teaching my students anything useful, that is how I came to work on Haskell. -- Erik Meijer, a major contributor to the functional programming language Haskell (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0N1aZ6SnBk)

>>3837
In other words, computer science is like writing in Perl.

>>3838
Nope. Perl gets read by CPU and does practical job, like filtering a log file, while Haskell, Coq and Agda code never read at all, frequently having less payload than a "public class Main: Program {final public void main() {} }" construct.

>>3815
the culture could be super cool, but as far as I know there are no underground nightclubs for hackers out there with an alpha build of Wipeout on hand. and if there are, I havent been to any of them. :C

>>3817
I think they must be hidden in Angelina Jolies' dead career.

>>3696

Gimme an irc channel and I'll join ya

>>3744
i agree with this.

im tired of 'jei guise, lerning C, jau do i convert
intrager to flota pleaz'-posts

or the 'whats best language EVERR?'-ones.

>>3798
thats a good start, and can always append links for other languages later.

I wonder if bolding works on this board. i sure hope so, or this post will look silly

http://pastebin.com/qnpkuFfp

bolding does work, so be sure to bold the titles.

I wrote this >>3802

>>3803
>Also Coq and Agda for theorem-proving, and remove Mercury which is more of a marginal language.
>+ remove Perl for being an old read-only piece of crap. Seriously, Python and Ruby make it completely obsolete.
>+ elaborate on Lishp being a family of languages and replace it with Clojure as it's more "functional" than most Lishps and the most actively used nowadays.
>+ mention an ML or at least F#.
I agree 100%.

I'll post an edited version later.

Seriously, the language you learn first really doesn't matter. As long as you understand the underlying concepts you can switch to any other programming language in a few days. What matters more than the selection of the programming language you pick is whether you have good learning material, a tutor or a good place where you can ask questions and discuss the new concepts or not. In programming languages there are different paradigms/styles. Once you mastered one paradigm, you can immediately switch to another language with the same paradigms. For example once you got how Object Oriented Programming (OOP) works the concepts and features are very similar in C++, C# or Java. Once you got how the more low-level imperative/procedual style, like in (pure) C, works and how you get shit done with that, you can easily pickup Ada.

Here's a little list with worthwhile languages per paradigm (WARNING : OPINIONS AHEAD):

OOP: Smalltalk (for how OOP ought to be), C# or C++ (warning: C++ is a huge mess) for more "real world"ish stuff.

Procedual:
- C (recommended), there are a LOT of libraries for C, so you can do pretty much anything, though some stuff will be significantly harder to do (correctly) under C as in more "high-level" languages. Also the ecosystem around it is HUGE. It can run (after sufficient setup which sometimes is by no means trivial) and pretty much ANY hardware. The overall language is in comparison rather crufty.
- Ada, it's like a way more pedantic C with horrible syntax, fine support for juggling numbers and a quite strong type system.

Functional:
- ML is the father of multiple modern programming languages features a strong powerful type system with automatic type inference, which means the machine is able to fill in the types for you.
Arguably the most widely use ML dialect used is OCaml, which incorporates OOP features as well.
A more recent decedent of ML is F#, which is very much like OCaml, but for .Net.

Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>3807
so many typos, fuck i need sleep