>>11340
>>11358
By the way.
Read the pdf, faggots.
DH this weekend. You better not fucking miss it.

Look at message 11313. That file has all the supplements. Thanks again anon for posting.

>>11379
Good to know.

>>11377
Ive been playing both warhammers for over 10 years and I very highly recommend you do this when you start playing. no matter what you read or people tell you their is no way to know what army you are going to enjoy playing or even which combination of units and this stuff is painfully expensive. I havent bought a model since 01' that wasnt off ebay for like 25% of its value and I proxied everything I could in the beginning, the people I play with still tease but fuck them I saved alot of money findind out I hate the dark eldar, dark angels, and necrons, wood elves and bretonnians

>>11385

(11377 here)
You say they tease you for using tokens, while I'm glad to hear they even let you play.

>>10112
Rarity is irrelevant and quality is subjective. Your argument is invalid.

does anyone have any Inquisitor Lord Hector Rex artwork?

>>10236

I don't think it's out yet. <.<

it comes out in july, give it time

There's a sticky with all the pdfs you need in this very board.
Just ctrl+f Pathfinder

Sorry to bump off your Ophidian Eye story, bro, but that was pretty enjoyable. Hehe.

Also, draft isn't going anywhere. I dunno if you guys haven't heard, but Eldrazi is going to be meant as more of a 'stand-apart' set. It won't see much, if any, play in competition, except for draft.

Drafts for ZEN block will either be ZEN-ZEN-WKE, ZEN-WKE-WKE, or EZI-EZI-EZI. It's a set built to be played against itself in draft, and this means that everyone will get these cards really, really quickly. Lol.

4 Ooze Garden
4 Anathemancer
4 Hell's Thunder
4 Hellspark Elemental
4 Corpse Connoisseur
4 Shambling Remains
4 Viscera Dragger
4 Act of Treson
4 Mark of Muntiny
4 Lightnig Bolt
4 Blightning
4 Savage land
4 Raging Ravine
5 mountain
5 swamp

Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>11348
>Four Kokusho
Just reminds me of a story about a Warp World deck that the guy that runs the local card shop experienced. He was playing it on MODO and was undefeated. His opponent was playing a B/W control deck and was stuck on two plains and two swamps, so he decides to churn off the Warp World combo. Opponent shuffles his lands in and flips:

Kokusho.
Kokusho.
Kokusho.
Kokusho.

played both, DnD 4= easy for new players to pick up and play but gets boring easily dnd 3.0 + 3.5 = more fun to play but takes some getting used to, me and my friends play 4.0 and 3.5 on rotating schedule and we all prefer 3 and 3.5 rules

>>8479
4th Edition is not D&D's 'Vista,' as you say, and while we are at it, to discuss different editions as 'some being better than others' is to completely miss the point of different editions.

Some are not better than others, they merely cater to different game play tastes. D&D (and Wizards of the Coast) actually did something quite brilliant in this--they release editions which are different enough that they capture many-to-most tabletop role players--which is why D&D remains quite visibly at the forefront and other games, such as 'Umbrarun' or whatever it is called, are far behind, so much so that there is a large gap between even whichever game is second-place to D&D. They are staying competitive by pursuing a wide diversity of products to attract more people to this fine hobby than if they were to simply build off of 3.5 or Pathfinder.

And as for 4th Edition? It's somewhat fast-paced with its simplified game play, characters are quite easy to roll, and a player does not have to spend too long deciding which feat or new power or career path to follow. Consider that along with refined, fluid artwork that does not vary so wildly to be garish, and the frankly cheesecake-clothed heroines, and what do you have?

A gateway drug.

The 4th is no better or worse than any other edition, it is simply the enabler for new players to get right into D&D, and when they find 4th Edition's rules to be too rigid, they will move onto another, more flexible edition or simply start homebrewing something of their own making, enriching the experience by applying their own creativity to the game. In turn, their own creativity will grow.

>>11351

I'm not really a fan of 4th Ed - I personally dislike some of the core assumptions, and prefer a game where emphasis is placed on the noncombat abilities of the character, and where those abilities are not nerfed in order to make the GM's job easier. I like challenging my players to try to outsmart me, and in a world where a 1st level character can cast Charm Person, that's a much more fun game for me.

However, I'll agree that D&D, being the household name of RPGs, needs to be easy to learn, and easy to follow, and newbs aren't going to have fun if, in their of first session, some 10 year 3.5 vet comes forward with a killer build and has half the campaign world Charmed and Dominated in the first 10 minutes of play. But after that same newb has RPed for a while, they might be open to playing a higher-powered game like World of Darkness or Exalted where characters are more easily able to bypass the laws of physics or even other characters' minds.

Even though I don't like 4th Ed, if it gets people off of WoW and brings more money in general to the RPG industry, I'll let it happen without too much bitching from my corner.

You'll still never catch me playing it, though, I like my 3.5/Pathfinder right where it is.

>>11239
Savage Worlds uses the Deadlands system but is built to be used with any setting. It's IMO the best system I've seen.

MtA as a Technocratic amalgam.

Hunter: The Reckoning. You have just enough mojo to think you have a chance, in a world where your survival rate is just above the average Call of Cthulhu PC.

>>11350
>how dare you make a thread i could easily hide and move on with my life BAAAAAAWWWWWW

Character generator? What the fuck is that?
Really, they have auto generators for characters?
Why do you even need something like that? It makes no sense!?

>>11380
No, it's like an online form where you put in the information, and it does most of the calculations for stats, secondary stats, etc. for you. Get rid of a lot of book-keeping in character creation.

>>11177

Yu-Gi-Oh failed in general when people started taking it seriously, like most CCGs. I probably had the most fun with it when all I owned was a theme deck and two boosters from random sets I don't remember.

>>11289
Hell, I never had a theme deck; my deck was built purely from booster packs.
Expensive as, but I think my ratio of rape-inducing cards to trash was quite high.
As a consequence, I never learned the proper rules, though; thank god for the anime.

someone gave me a ton of these cards and I built decks out of cards that worked together and I got reemed by decks that were just stacks of random rare monsters.