-  [WT]  [PS]  [Home] [Manage]

  1.   (new thread)
  2. [ No File]
  3. (for post and file deletion)
/phi/ - Philosophy
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG, WEBM
  • Maximum file size allowed is 1000 KB.
  • Images greater than 200x200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 473 unique user posts. View catalog

  • Blotter updated: 2011-01-12 Show/Hide Show All

There's a new /777/ up, it's /selfhelp/ - You're Pathetic, We're Pathetic, We Can Do This! Check it out. Suggest new /777/s here.

Movies & TV 24/7 via Channel7: Web Player, .m3u file. Music via Radio7: Web Player, .m3u file.

WebM is now available sitewide! Please check this thread for more info.

Anonymous ## Mod ## 11/10/26(Wed)10:01 No. 3905 ID: 4c1a8e [Reply] Stickied
3905

File 13196161034.jpg - (71.49KB , 256x256 , slow.jpg )

For growing and shit or whatever I present to you:

THE BIG STICKIED THREAD OF PHILOSOPHY RESOURCES



Put in whatever resources that fit in here, whether it's from wikipedia, youtube, some university, or where ever. Just remember to keep it within the board's guidelines and rules.
Use it or lose it, faggots.


30 posts and 3 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
EL+NEGRO 15/01/13(Tue)04:06 No. 11988 ID: c11c78

http://www.reasonablefaith.org/

Best Christian philosopher in the world

Richard Dawkins is this guy's bitch
He humiliated Sam Harris
He defeated Christopher Hitchens
He defeated Victor Stenger twice




Anonymous ## Mod ## 12/02/02(Thu)05:26 No. 5920 ID: 4fb7fa [Reply] [First 100 posts] [Last 50 posts] Stickied
5920

File 132815678430.jpg - (161.57KB , 500x452 , 6904084_Untitled-2.jpg )

This thread is for discussion of the validity of religion(s) and arguments for and against the existence of god/gods.

Any other new posts about this subject will be deleted, or locked and referred to this one.

New threads about religious concepts that play inside their own ruleset are allowed, and we kindly ask that you refrain from turning those well meaning threads into arguments about religion as a whole.


307 posts and 18 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anonymous 15/03/27(Fri)08:19 No. 12104 ID: c81cb7

Do Neanderthals go to heaven? They buried their dead with grave goods.

We (white people) have 3% of their DNA. Do we get their gods, do they get ours?

Do we get into their afterlife, do they get into ours?




READ THIS BEFORE POSTING YOU PILE OF FAGGOTS Anonymous ## Mod ## 11/09/09(Fri)04:51 No. 2371 ID: 175f07 [Reply] Locked Stickied
2371

File 131553668277.jpg - (24.94KB , 400x615 , formalblacktie2.jpg )

We interrupt your scheduled bickering for this important announcement: Understanding /phi/

  • What this board is:
    • A place to discuss epistemology, ethics, aesthetics, metaphysics, and logic, in a general sense, or in an applied sense (in sex, science, vidya, your mother).
    • A place where not only is being a pretentious, hubristic dickhead is allowed, but is considered the norm.
  • What this board is not:
    • It is not /b/, /x/, or /rnb/.
    • A place to spew incoherent nonsense and verbal diarrhea.
    • A place to make claims with no justifications (and "because I say so" or "because you're gay" isn't a justification).
    • A place where the global rules do not apply.
An inability to follow these conventions will result in a warning!
Repeat offenders will be banned!


>>
Anonymous ## Mod ## 11/12/04(Sun)05:06 No. 4980 ID: 4c1a8e

Dear faggots,
I shouldn't have to remind you, but if someone is posting something against the rules, please report it.

If you don't know how to report a post, please see our super-sugoi FAQ section on the front page.

Thank you for your co-operation.
-7chan




Anonymous 14/11/21(Fri)23:19 No. 11896 ID: cc6b6b [Reply]
11896

File 141660837828.jpg - (149.71KB , 1280x800 , 1332533281340.jpg )

Let's get down to it.

What is the meaning of life?


27 posts and 1 image omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anonymous 15/03/27(Fri)08:31 No. 12106 ID: c81cb7
12106

File 142744147896.jpg - (279.79KB , 1440x1031 , mods2008.jpg )

Hang on who is to say it hasn't been figured out? Can I convince you to join my religion? Or can you convince you to join your?

What is the test for truth?

The more the universe seems comprehensible, the more it also seems pointless.


>>
Anonymous 15/03/27(Fri)08:33 No. 12107 ID: c81cb7

We will durp around for the next 20 years until the computers tell us what to believe.

Deep AI that knows everything is better then any prophet


>>
Anonymous 15/03/27(Fri)17:36 No. 12110 ID: 77f05a
12110

File 142747416672.jpg - (182.66KB , 977x728 , SCIENCE WP.jpg )

> The meaning of life is 42.

Several years ago, I was minding my own business and an interpretation of that story suddenly hit me.

A supercomputer did science for millions of years and obtained 42. This number can be said to represent science itself, the raw data of the universe, its mechanics and all input and events.

But to create a purpose and inherent level of importance for raw data, you need to ask questions. So that perhaps there exists some "Ultimate Question to the Ultimate Answer to Life, the Universe, and Everything" as described in the story. And apparently it would require a larger computer, operating much longer, trying things that defy logic.

Things like religion and philosophy can be seen as attempts to posit such question, possibly drawing it from some source that is not included in the raw data; i.e., the physical universe.

Adams was atheist and I doubt he would like this interpretation, but he's dead so whatever.




Anonymous 15/03/21(Sat)00:47 No. 12097 ID: 1df3c1 [Reply]
12097

File 142689522274.jpg - (22.82KB , 284x177 , images.jpg )

Do you, my fellow philosophers, think suicide and anorexia are a result of north american consumerism and the culture of always wanting to be better, or are just diseases that people are born with?


>>
Anonymous 15/03/27(Fri)08:44 No. 12108 ID: c81cb7
12108

File 142744229736.jpg - (53.29KB , 600x397 , ua155_g.jpg )

If there is no point in the universe that we discover by the methods of science, there is a point that we can give the universe by the way we live, by loving each other, by discovering things about nature, by creating works of art.

That—in a way, although we are not the stars in a cosmic drama, if the only drama we're starring in is one that we are making up as we go along, it is not entirely ignoble that faced with this unloving, impersonal universe we make a little island of warmth and love and science and art for ourselves.

That's not an entirely despicable role for us to play.


>>
Anonymous 15/03/27(Fri)08:51 No. 12109 ID: c81cb7
12109

File 142744268361.jpg - (48.44KB , 624x351 , 7chan_soldiers.jpg )




Anonymous 14/10/01(Wed)01:11 No. 11831 ID: 1644d2 [Reply]
11831

File 141211868475.jpg - (218.03KB , 680x450 , 2013610101052164734_20.jpg )

Quote from the mod post

"A place to spew incoherent nonsense and verbal diarrhea"
Thats what philosophy is. Science absolutely destroys philosophy and spreading philosophies popularity in use by having this board exist is helping to keep society as a whole from using superior methods of problem solving that would help make the world a better place

Please mods and staff of 7chan delete this board
Thanks

Anon


12 posts and 2 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anonymous 15/03/05(Thu)00:26 No. 12079 ID: 46614e

Philosophy makes us ask why. Science answers the whats. The more whats we figure out, the more we wanna know why. They piggyback off of each other. Science might get us where we want to be, but we wouldn't have gotten there without philosophy.


>>
Anonymous 15/03/05(Thu)01:14 No. 12080 ID: d2ef46

>>12079
Science is the methodologically applied philosophy of nature.


>>
Anonymous 15/03/20(Fri)23:16 No. 12096 ID: 1df3c1

>>11832
But what if the religion does not use god, as its basis, but natural spirits such as various religions of north american first nations.




Anonymous 15/01/19(Mon)07:52 No. 11996 ID: 1b02b6 [Reply]
11996

File 142165034863.jpg - (45.93KB , 600x600 , 1419480316512.jpg )

Worst place to ask since 99% of you couldn't even think of "letting go".

How do I let go of my ego? Or another way of asking is "how do I stop the desire to prove myself worthy among my peers?". It's totally unnecessary, and sitting at home alone I can comfortably say that it's doable and the mindset actually worth having, but when I leave the door I cannot stop myself from becoming a totally different person. That is, one who feeds off the facial expressions of another person and who constantly seeks their approval, or "good" facial expressions. I genuinely don't care what they think when I'm home alone at the end of the day but I guess I still do if I'm behaving this way.

In asking this I'm hoping to find that 1% who can genuinely relate to me and may have found a solution, or at least philosophical banters that put my mind in solace when I leave the doors. (The answer "just stop caring" isn't as easy as you might think).


5 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anonymous 15/01/29(Thu)12:21 No. 12008 ID: 72041e

>>11999

I think taming your ego and letting go are not the same.

You can probably don't think much about yourself and still care about things and people, only you become less manipulative and do not seek attention (you may seek attention for love etc... but you dont care enough for praise or other empty stuff)

...But that's just like my oppinion, maaan...


>>
Anonymous 15/02/05(Thu)08:40 No. 12016 ID: b50383

>>11996 Step 1: Read/study Hagakure Step 2: Find something or someone to serve Step 3: ????? Step 4: Profit! p.s. loosely based on personal experience


>>
Anonymous 15/03/19(Thu)11:07 No. 12094 ID: f3e21f

you dont. ego is what made this world work its a mans instinct




Anonymous 15/03/08(Sun)03:39 No. 12081 ID: 21c076 [Reply]
12081

File 142578236116.gif - (15.18KB , 175x219 , The_Poisonous_Mushroom.gif )

Wha'd'u think about Antinatalism/Having kids is unethical?
1. The presence of pain is bad.
2. The presence of pleasure is good.
3. The absence of pain is good, even if that good is not enjoyed by anyone.
4. The absence of pleasure is not bad unless there is somebody for whom this absence is a deprivation.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antinatalism


2 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anonymous 15/03/08(Sun)05:05 No. 12084 ID: eb89c4

If I produce offspring, I'd be doing it for myself, not for them. I couldn't give less of a shit about what they feel. Sure, I'll take good care of them if that produces some kind of desirable outcome for me. But if it doesn't, I won't.


>>
Anonymous 15/03/19(Thu)08:08 No. 12093 ID: a6c17c

I've been thinking about this and have come to the conclusion that Antinatalism is stupid.

Really think about all the works mankind; humanity has an obligation to itself. And Antinatalism's position on sentient beings is as follows: nonexistence is superior existence. They muse that there are beings that experienced reality, that thought outside of themselves, that conquered nature and created civilization; however, they should be done away with because they feel bad. Is this what things have come down to? Why should "muh feelings" be more important than anything else?

This is similar to how Theodore Kaczynski wished to destroy Industrial Society because of "muh feelings," rather than caring more about Objective Truth and getting the human species off of planet Earth.

http://therightstuff.biz/2013/03/25/anti-natalism-and-vhemt-the-irresponsible-philosophy/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=scbSo1fPYKk


>>
Anonymous 15/03/19(Thu)11:34 No. 12095 ID: 9e7423

Antinatalism has some ties with Pessimism (as embodied by Schopenhauer) and here's a long running related thread
>>8621




References for Essay - "Is it possible to know anything for certain?& Anonymous 15/03/09(Mon)08:44 No. 12086 ID: 7a8eee [Reply]
12086

File 142588706952.jpg - (19.73KB , 283x370 , Parmenides of Elea.jpg )

Hey /phi/ I have to do a library research task for University and I have to find 10 sources to reference in my essay about the topic "Is it possible to know anything for certain?" I'm having trouble finding sources as I am very new to the academic side of philosophy and so I don't have a vast knowledge of philosophers, texts or specific theories and ideas. Any help would be GREATLY appreciated. Cheers.


1 post omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anonymous 15/03/09(Mon)11:26 No. 12088 ID: 0d43d5

same poster.
you should also consider just googling epistemology syllabi.


>>
Anonymous 15/03/10(Tue)07:32 No. 12089 ID: d2ef46

I fucking hate that question so much. It always devolves into solipsistic bullshit.

"Oh hey you can't trust your own sensory perceptions blah blah blah maybe you're not even real blah blah blah."

Well maybe I should punch you in the face. You have no right to get mad because NO I DIDN'T, AND IF YOU THINK I DID THEN MAYBE YOU SHOULDN'T TRUST YOUR SENSORY PERCEPTIONS. I'M NOT REAL AFTER ALL, AND YOU CAN'T BE CERTAIN THAT I AM.

If you didn't get the picture, I fucking hate solipsists. More flawed than political correctness. At least you can debate ethics, solipsism can just be proven wrong with a punch to the face.

But yeah, thread topic. Just reference a bunch of mathematical texts. Doesn't even have to be calculus shit, it can be basic arithmetic. You could also probably get away with fucking around with people who disagree with your thesis by annoying them and feigning ignorance.

But seriously, fuck that question.


>>
Anonymous 15/03/19(Thu)07:29 No. 12092 ID: a6c17c
12092

File 142674655328.jpg - (83.33KB , 568x385 , thomas-carlyles-quotes-1.jpg )

OP, a priori knowledge is totally true. The law of identity (A=A) is true; think about mathematics: 2+2=4. It does't matter if you have a false conscience or whatever, because it is 100% true.

>>12089
Yeah I find that bullshit retarded too. Science is true, and anyone who disagrees with this objective reality can jump off a building. Furthermore, extreme skepticism is garbage. People should be faithful to the Earth in all its realism. And I hate this, "The Golden Rule is there is no Golden Rule," crap. Perhaps there should be a Golden Rule lest everything come down to Subjective Truth.




Dud 15/03/01(Sun)23:52 No. 12076 ID: 7cc6b4 [Reply]
12076

File 142525034493.jpg - (33.84KB , 500x348 , 1385802061248.jpg )

Consider someone with multiple personality disorder.
How would a Materialist and an Idealist view this phenomenon?


>>
Anonymous 15/03/08(Sun)14:34 No. 12085 ID: b2c2db

I don't know what either of those are but what would happen if someone with it had two personalities wherein one was a materialist and the other an idealist and they knew of each other

how would they reconcile the shared experiences?




Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason