-  [WT]  [PS]  [Home] [Manage]

  1.   (new thread)
  2. [ No File]
  3. (for post and file deletion)
/phi/ - Philosophy
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 1000 KB.
  • Images greater than 200x200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 497 unique user posts. View catalog

  • Blotter updated: 2011-01-12 Show/Hide Show All

Movies & TV 24/7 via Channel7: Web Player, .m3u file. Music via Radio7: Web Player, .m3u file.

WebM support has been added on a trial basis. Please check this thread for more info.

Anonymous ## Mod ## 11/10/26(Wed)10:01 No. 3905 ID: 4c1a8e [Reply] Stickied
3905

File 13196161034.jpg - (71.49KB , 256x256 , slow.jpg )

For growing and shit or whatever I present to you:

THE BIG STICKIED THREAD OF PHILOSOPHY RESOURCES



Put in whatever resources that fit in here, whether it's from wikipedia, youtube, some university, or where ever. Just remember to keep it within the board's guidelines and rules.
Use it or lose it, faggots.


26 posts and 3 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anonymous 14/02/14(Fri)02:00 No. 11120 ID: 29df20

This site is absolutely amazing. Use it well. All the lectures are wonderful.

http://academicearth.org/online-college-courses/philosophy/

Check out their other courses as well...




Anonymous ## Mod ## 12/02/02(Thu)05:26 No. 5920 ID: 4fb7fa [Reply] [First 100 posts] [Last 50 posts] Stickied
5920

File 132815678430.jpg - (161.57KB , 500x452 , 6904084_Untitled-2.jpg )

This thread is for discussion of the validity of religion(s) and arguments for and against the existence of god/gods.

Any other new posts about this subject will be deleted, or locked and referred to this one.

New threads about religious concepts that play inside their own ruleset are allowed, and we kindly ask that you refrain from turning those well meaning threads into arguments about religion as a whole.


281 posts and 15 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anonymous 14/07/30(Wed)06:45 No. 11642 ID: 3b67e7

>>10744
I wouldn't put to much trust in a wiki page that still thanks the appendix is useless.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-is-the-function-of-t/




READ THIS BEFORE POSTING YOU PILE OF FAGGOTS Anonymous ## Mod ## 11/09/09(Fri)04:51 No. 2371 ID: 175f07 [Reply] Locked Stickied
2371

File 131553668277.jpg - (24.94KB , 400x615 , formalblacktie2.jpg )

We interrupt your scheduled bickering for this important announcement: Understanding /phi/

  • What this board is:
    • A place to discuss epistemology, ethics, aesthetics, metaphysics, and logic, in a general sense, or in an applied sense (in sex, science, vidya, your mother).
    • A place where not only is being a pretentious, hubristic dickhead is allowed, but is considered the norm.
  • What this board is not:
    • It is not /b/, /x/, or /rnb/.
    • A place to spew incoherent nonsense and verbal diarrhea.
    • A place to make claims with no justifications (and "because I say so" or "because you're gay" isn't a justification).
    • A place where the global rules do not apply.
An inability to follow these conventions will result in a warning!
Repeat offenders will be banned!


>>
Anonymous ## Mod ## 11/12/04(Sun)05:06 No. 4980 ID: 4c1a8e

Dear faggots,
I shouldn't have to remind you, but if someone is posting something against the rules, please report it.

If you don't know how to report a post, please see our super-sugoi FAQ section on the front page.

Thank you for your co-operation.
-7chan




Political philosophy and the rights of children Anonymous 14/07/27(Sun)08:14 No. 11626 ID: aaad3e [Reply]
11626

File 14064416791.jpg - (7.30KB , 150x150 , starpharma-and-durex.jpg )

According to a Wikipedia page:

'Consultation

Mechanisms for involving children in decision-making in Australia are poor. From finding out what makes a good school, to understanding the special needs of indigenous, rural, or refugee children, or children with a disability or in out-of home care; Australia does not follow best practise for finding out and incorporating the views of children. Where legislation does require children to participate in the decisions made about them, there tends to be no evaluation of how effectively this is achieved. Australia needs to learn more from examples of best practise for children’s participation and implement these mechanisms across public policy.
Data and Monitoring

The catalogue of things Australia does not know about its children is surprisingly large. Australia does not know the different reasons why its children live in out-of-home-care, we do not know about the reasons for and occurrence of suicide or attempted suicide in children and young people. Australia doesn’t have nationally consistent data on indigenous communities and children. In order to begin creating and implementing policies and systems that help children, we need more information on their health, well-being, experiences and opinions.'

I'm quite disgusted, personally, by the lack of personhood attributed to young people. I think this comes down to their lack of voting ability. I suspect future generations will look upon this in the same way as other forms of political discrimination where at one time. There will always be someone who claims 'oh no but THIS form of discrimination is differnet and legitimate cause women are ALWAYS stupider or NO black is developed as much as whites and so forthe.

I want to do survey that sorts out people's responses to how much rights children should have by age and by if and when they had their kids. I want to go on to promote public discourse on child rights. I just graduated from uinversity, but with a major in the physical sciences. What should I do from here? I don't really want to do another undergraduation so I can articulate on to a research degree. I'm open to everything that optimises the ultimate outcome of better child rights. Take into consideration that I'm pretty mentally unstable and will probably die at a young age so I don't want to basically, mince my time.


1 post omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anonymous 14/07/28(Mon)03:59 No. 11628 ID: 194aaa

>>11627
That's ridiculous. I was way more capacitated to vote and interested in politics when I was six than I am now, and I'm sure many kids are way less easy to manipulate than several niggers than can be bought with social benefits or just plain cash.
The solution is to run a test on everyone who's interested in voting, and giving to those who pass it a vote card, and denying vote on those who don't.


>>
Matchbox+Prince 14/07/29(Tue)13:07 No. 11630 ID: 2f260d

>>11628

You're fucking joking. I've never in my LIFE heard of something more desperately begging for total corruption. Give that "system" of yours about five months, and the only people who will be deemed worthy to vote will be the wealthy and powerful. Instead of a democracy that occasionally tries to become an oligarchy, you'd have an oligarchy pretending to be a democracy.


>>
Anonymous 14/08/01(Fri)02:25 No. 11648 ID: e65a14

I absolutely think there should be a minimum voting age, but I think there should be a maximum voting age too. The advancement of medical science should not be the burden of political progress.




WwWWHHHHHHhHHHHHHyyyyyyyYYyyYyyYyYYyyYyyyyYYyyyyy Anonymous 14/07/22(Tue)07:10 No. 11611 ID: 55acac [Reply]
11611

File 140600584561.jpg - (191.36KB , 1600x1000 , Question everything.jpg )

Why ask why?


5 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anonymous 14/07/30(Wed)07:41 No. 11643 ID: 608848

>>11641
I-I'm not sure I understand what you are saying.

Are you saying that you can't prove that the silly answer is the best with philosophical argumentation, so therefore, why not believe the silly answer?


>>
Anonymous 14/07/30(Wed)08:20 No. 11644 ID: 1b02b6

>>11643
Why pose that question for me to answer?
Maybe because the neurons are potentially wired to respon--
Why not?
Ok, let's settle for why not! My philosophy professor said it was the best answer to "why?"


>>
Anonymous 14/08/01(Fri)01:57 No. 11647 ID: 914c63

Because solving puzzles is pleasurable to some people.




Anonymous 14/07/30(Wed)04:50 No. 11639 ID: d0d4ac [Reply]
11639

File 140668863786.jpg - (43.87KB , 406x422 , 1406466276334.jpg )

Greetings /phi/, I am here to spread the word of Max Stirner from /lit/.

Have you let voluntary egoism into your life?


>>
Anonymous 14/07/31(Thu)07:51 No. 11645 ID: 914c63

I've found some similarities between his thought and Bruce Lee's. Bruce Lee pretty firmly rejected the metaphysical (except figuratively), but also incorporated a lot of Zen into his thought.

"There is no such thing as doing right or wrong when there is freedom."

"Set patterns, incapable of adaptability, of pliability, only offer a better cage. Truth is outside of all patterns."

Criticism for certain martial arts schools.
"super mental power and spiritual this and spiritual that are desperately incorporated until these practitioners drift further and further into mystery and abstraction. "

"Watch, but don’t stop and interpret, “I am free”—then you’re living in a memory of something that has gone. To understand and live now, everything of yesterday must die."

"The struggle between “for” and “against” is the mind’s worst disease."


>>
Anonymous 14/07/31(Thu)21:22 No. 11646 ID: 2547a2

>>11645
Shit, I need to read his books.

Also, highly HIGHLY recommend the book "God Wants You Dead" to anyone who likes Stirner.




Anonymous 14/07/27(Sun)06:49 No. 11624 ID: aaad3e [Reply]
11624

File 140643656039.jpg - (308.44KB , 1600x1165 , 1spenceletterslant-graphicsfairy006.jpg )

Should I associate the concept of ontology closer to epistemology, philosophy of mind or logic?

You can't say metaphysics by the way.


1 post omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anonymous 14/07/29(Tue)13:24 No. 11633 ID: be4b9e

IDs are a bitch, eh.
>>/sci/15647
>>11626


>>
Anonymous 14/07/29(Tue)17:58 No. 11634 ID: aaad3e

>>11629
Yes, it is I. I thought I'd improved. Evidently not. I will leave, once again, to work on myself. I promise you this, 7chan, I will return. And if it is not then, one day I will be valuable contributor to this community. You have my word.


>>
Anonymous 14/07/30(Wed)03:01 No. 11635 ID: 54e99b

>>11634
Holy shit you actually replied? Neat, so there is a human behind that computer.

Anyways, I think >>11626 is an improvement because you actually included a position to begin the conversation from, rather than being like "Yo here's a question, now discuss." and then never adding anything to the discussion you started.




Anonymous 14/06/12(Thu)05:34 No. 11510 ID: 0d277c [Reply]
11510

File 140254405115.gif - (5.61KB , 240x273 , 1401868879446.gif )

Why is equality so widely accepted as a moral principle and a political goal? I could present any prescriptive statement and it would be 100% as valid as "People should be equal".

Also, why is it postulated that people ARE equal? The opposite can be easily proven empirically. In that way, egalitarianism is less valid than religion.


13 posts and 2 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anonymous 14/07/19(Sat)12:00 No. 11590 ID: 55acac

>>11583
1. Money matters most in life.

2. Be not shy about money-making.

3. Trust not anyone with money.

4. Nothing is free in this world, not even love.

5. One who worships the money god will be amply rewarded. One who worships the other God will be stripped naked and left in the streets.

6. Make money by hook or by crook.

7. Make money by any means.

Message too long. Click here to view the full text.


>>
Anonymous 14/07/20(Sun)07:36 No. 11597 ID: 800849

>>11590
What did they do when they didn't have money? Wait... Money was then measured in stuff, right?


>>
Matchbox Prince 14/07/26(Sat)23:09 No. 11623 ID: 2f260d

>>11590

I think this should have been put on the Pioneer and Voyager probes. Sums up humanity much better than all that silly other crap like art and music and science, which are all just pretexts to acquiring more money.




Anonymous 14/07/09(Wed)18:31 No. 11556 ID: 6f3afd [Reply]
11556

File 140492345926.jpg - (38.85KB , 480x360 , image.jpg )

I am attempting to discern the meaning of Nietzsche's superman. I know that it was an answer to nihilism in the wake of the death of God, but I am trying to define the properties of the superman. I plan to use the Kantian epistemological view of animal/human rationality and empiricism along with the statement that man is a rope between animal and superman to justify it. I have read Thus Spoke Zarathustra and The Gay Science as well as Critique of Pure Reason. What else should I read to develop a better understanding of the superman?


4 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anonymous 14/07/19(Sat)07:42 No. 11580 ID: 800849

Well, to live forever would make you all-powerful. You wouldn't need to worry about wasted time, and all you know would last until the end of time.

(Living forever means body not deteriorating, and developing immunity to any virus or condition. Of course, stupidity isn't a condition in this case. So you won't be immune to moving trains.)


>>
Anonymous 14/07/22(Tue)06:56 No. 11610 ID: 55acac

>>11580
Wouldn't you have to be a transhuman if you were immortal? If that's so, then why assume stupidity isn't a condition in this case? You'll be like a strong robot with a human brain or something idfk why did you even post this


>>
Anonymous 14/07/26(Sat)19:31 No. 11622 ID: 86e709

>>11580
>all-powerful

Or you'd be the most feeble, weak, and decrepit puddle of skin cells and drool in existence, because unless magic, living IS deterioration, from day 1. Even on a cellular, even genetic level, growth is death.

You'd need to merge your organic brain to a more serviceable artificial computer until it's operating 100% parity, and then let that organic brain die off gradually until you reside solely in the artifice. In a couple thousand more years this may be a reality. May not.

Then you'd just be software, able to think and interact with other software-people, eventually even create new sodtware-people without having to go through all that costly messy ugliness of physical birth & life & transition. ...so long as the super race of robots mining the earth for fuel to keep the power on kept at it.

Wait, what was the question...




Anonymous 14/05/01(Thu)06:51 No. 11285 ID: 746c8f [Reply]
11285

File 139891986274.jpg - (51.85KB , 500x261 , Epictetus.jpg )

Epicurus Vs. Epictetus

Who has the better philosophy?

Epicurus's hedonism seems like a nice way to live, but is it as practical as Epictetus's teachings of mental discipline?


46 posts and 6 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anonymous 14/07/22(Tue)08:20 No. 11612 ID: 55acac

>>11602
...and in all absolute seriousness, don't talk shit on my god Dionysus.


>>
Anonymous 14/07/22(Tue)08:28 No. 11613 ID: 55acac

>>11612
You don't want to know what that crazy bastard is capable of when you irritate him enough.


>>
Anonymous 14/07/26(Sat)19:12 No. 11620 ID: 86e709

>>11613
But he deaaad mafucka.
Yo dadday can't do shyit.




Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason