-  [WT]  [PS]  [Home] [Manage]

  1.   (new thread)
  2. [ No File]
  3. (for post and file deletion)
/phi/ - Philosophy
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG, WEBM
  • Maximum file size allowed is 1000 KB.
  • Images greater than 200x200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 576 unique user posts. View catalog

  • Blotter updated: 2011-01-12 Show/Hide Show All

There's a new /777/ up, it's /gardening/ Check it out. Suggest new /777/s here.

Movies & TV 24/7 via Channel7: Web Player, .m3u file. Music via Radio7: Web Player, .m3u file.

WebM is now available sitewide! Please check this thread for more info.

Anonymous 16/03/14(Mon)14:42 No. 12465 ID: cad79b [Reply]
12465

File 145796296843.jpg - (557.42KB , 1500x1600 , stock-vector-military-infographic-template-vector-.jpg )

What are your latest intellectual/philosophy interests? For me it's Strategy, ambiguity, animal activism and Wikification




Anti-inspirational thread aka real life thread Anonymous 16/02/13(Sat)18:14 No. 12436 ID: d1b5b0 [Reply]
12436

File 145538367484.jpg - (220.10KB , 1640x958 , 1455374817947_picmonkeyed.jpg )

Anti-inspirational thread aka real life thread.

Pic is related for women close to 30-35.


>>
Anonymous 16/03/05(Sat)01:10 No. 12454 ID: dadde9

>>12436
She's lived with that awful crick in her neck her whole life.




Anonymous 15/11/16(Mon)03:28 No. 12320 ID: 7e7744 [Reply]
12320

File 14476409049.jpg - (87.43KB , 600x450 , 1447392292819.jpg )

What is Life?


>>
Anonymous 15/11/17(Tue)21:06 No. 12324 ID: 3fae4c

A really shitty YLYL thread.


>>
Anonymous 16/01/24(Sun)14:11 No. 12417 ID: 12ee37

>>12324
thread/




reality zero 15/11/15(Sun)04:46 No. 12319 ID: b7967e [Reply]
12319

File 144755917355.jpg - (29.53KB , 371x396 , images.jpg )

Creepy dude told me yesterday in bach world wasnot real, everything was an ilusion, even him or me or anything were actually irrelevant.
Quickly I reasoned and told him that this concept was nonsense, as a surreality is clearly something below,our world, like a simulation or matrix, everything was actually perceptible, he was able to see, touch, and smell. Those stimuli turned into neuronal information and that is what we call reality, even if did not exist like in string theory. Reality concept would be reformulated as,it does not get more "real" that. So his actual belief was a,super-reality above ours... he seemed really happy for that talk we had.

So what do you think? Exprime monde


1 post omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anonymous 15/11/18(Wed)06:24 No. 12328 ID: b7967e
12328

File 144782429560.gif - (5.43KB , 782x543 , mspaintadventure18.gif )

>>12323
Interesting philosophy we found here...


>>
Anonymous 15/11/20(Fri)07:53 No. 12335 ID: ca3ceb

>>12328
Damn straight it is.
If he really believes in this crap he shouldn't get mad at anything or get frustrated and shit because it's not real.


>>
Anonymous 16/01/22(Fri)06:48 No. 12415 ID: c39e43

>>12319
that is the exact same idea that I believe, that of a
'super-reality'. feel free to ask any questions.




The people who ruin life angryATunfairness 16/01/10(Sun)18:55 No. 12400 ID: 9b31fb [Reply]
12400

File 145244850094.jpg - (308.37KB , 1480x2630 , whydoesntlifeobeytherules.jpg )

Why doesn't life OBEY.

WTF IS LIFES PROBLEM. LIFE MIGHT ASWELL BE A DOG!!!!

one day someone has to kill the person who has ruined life for everybody. people whose intention is to ruin everybodys life need to be shot before they reach power.

before you call me angry. i say steer you brain. surely these people designing to ruin the world are the real angry ones. that i have "NO BAD INTENTIONS" against THEM.... i hope you will see reason to be on my side... AND NOT on the side of a bunch of opinion seeking psychopaths.


>>
Anonymous 16/01/14(Thu)12:09 No. 12406 ID: 9c3171

Reality (and by extension life) is indifferent to us.

It doesn't care about you as it is not capable of doing so.




Anonymous 16/01/03(Sun)23:16 No. 12392 ID: ae1736 [Reply]
12392

File 145185937838.jpg - (18.72KB , 214x320 , 51I JFzOcTL__AC_UL320_SR214,320_.jpg )

Is formality just a way to nuance impulses?

The more you can resist impulses, the more disciplined you are.
Discipline is merely to chose to act according to your ideal self.

Can I theorise that the more you conform yourself to accepted society, the more formal you appear to be.

Or is formalaty just a way to nuance your true self, to hide all your flaws and to act according to protocol. Which protocol is based on civilised society.

Is to strive for an highly civilized society an end goal? Can innvation only come from dicipline? Should we shift the paradigm for high society to a different one? Is formality a means to an end?




Anonymous 14/03/02(Sun)05:26 No. 11146 ID: 600abd [Reply]
11146

File 139373436128.jpg - (7.14KB , 225x225 , coconut head.jpg )

The other day in religion class, my teacher played a sermon about Catholicism and stuff. The shortest I could put it is, "If there was no god, then the universe would have had to started somewhere, the big bang per say. If we could use a computer and go look at that explosion, or a simulation of, we'd be able to figure out the rate at which the universe expands. From this we'd essentially be able to figure out the future and then life would be meaningless, because our choices would already have been determined."

Any thoughts on this? I thought it was a pretty interesting standpoint, but was probably worded confusingly in order to sound smart and force people to think you know what you're talking about...


29 posts and 2 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anonymous 15/08/04(Tue)08:48 No. 12255 ID: b3036a

>>12002
As I see it, this falls apart at point 4
God simply knowing the future doesn't mean the future is set in stone or prevent others from being able to change the future, if anything it means that God would know the new future as soon as the path of events changes, or even beforehand, and he would know any changes possible to the future, so he could prevent changes if he wanted, but I don't see any reason to think that he does. God knows everything, so he CAN eliminate free will, but evidently chooses to let people choose. All powerful doesn't mean all controlling.


>>
Freewill/determinism Me 15/12/29(Tue)16:51 No. 12385 ID: 07a493

>>11694
Do you control randomness?


>>
Me 15/12/29(Tue)16:56 No. 12386 ID: 07a493

>>11752
Because scientist know beyond a reasonable doubt the origins and fate of existence, right?




Why? Anonymous 15/09/28(Mon)07:55 No. 12285 ID: 42bd01 [Reply]
12285

File 144341975798.jpg - (72.97KB , 480x480 , PoMo wanna take ur p0rnz.jpg )

"The conflict between men and women is brutal. 'The normal fuck,' writes Andrea Dworkin, 'by a normal man is taken to be an act of invasion and ownership undertaken in a mode of predation.' This special insight into the sexual psychology of males is matched and confirmed by the sexual experience of women:

'Women have been chattels to men as wives, as prostitutes,
as sexual and reproductive servants. Being owned and
being fucked are or have been virtually synonymous
experiences in the lives of women. He owns you; he fucks
you. The fucking conveys the quality of ownership: he
owns you inside out.'

Dworkin and her colleague, Catharine MacKinnon, then call for the censorship of pornography on postmodern grounds. Our social reality is constructed by the language we use, and pornography is a form of language, one that constructs a violent and domineering reality for women to submit to. Pornography, therefore, is not free speech but political oppression." --Explaining Postmodernism (http://www.libertarianismo.org/livros/srchpostmodernism.pdf)

Why do PoMo faggots want to rid the world of freedoms that Westerners have fought and died for? These are freedoms that MOST everyone enjoys, but instead we have pussies that value equality over freedom.

Other civilization destroying ill: http://youtu.be/cCOLcMqdpls & http://youtu.be/oyZDVA2bG0w


2 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anonymous 15/11/09(Mon)07:54 No. 12317 ID: 98407e

>>12299
Absolutely not true at all. I can send my sources later today, but I wrote a lengthy rebttal to someone claiming porn causes sexism or some nonsense, and I had sourced a report of compiled studies that all showed unequivocally that porn, especially BDSM, not only made men more receptive to their partners' needs, but also improved their sex lives just about across the board. The only "drawback" according to current standards was that the people who watched the more extreme pornography generally had shorter relationships, which is understandable if their sexual behaviour improves their sex lives, given that partners less well-suited sexually would probably increase with the diversity of taste.


>>
Anonymous 15/11/25(Wed)01:14 No. 12345 ID: 30272a

>>12315
Wonderful post. I'm just lurking but you expressed your ideas fantastically and I agree.


>>
Anonymous 15/12/25(Fri)08:49 No. 12376 ID: 0e1f6c

Porn is very diverse therefore there is porn for everyone, women and men alike. I only think its damaging if a person has unresolved issues that prevent them from being able to enjoy porn. Otherwise, it's a great way to explore ones own sexuality and fantasies.

Internet culture is, to a degree, what you make it (sites you visit, threads you post in, ect.) and with the variety of porn available people using the Internet mostly watch what they want to, more reinforcing who they already are than introducing new ideas.




Anonymous 14/04/23(Wed)14:30 No. 11267 ID: 161fda [Reply]
11267

File 139825624666.jpg - (8.10KB , 261x146 , 10253881_742563365784373_2343968229740445120_n.jpg )

Question: Are humans rational creatures if they let emotions affect their thinking?


9 posts and 1 image omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
comatoast!!L1A2Z5BQN4 15/12/08(Tue)06:28 No. 12363 ID: 1238e8

>>11267


Humans are as rational as they choose to be. (Assuming we have choice)

Emotions are just an obstacle.


>>
Anonymous 15/12/09(Wed)03:47 No. 12365 ID: bee824

>>12363
I would say it would depend on if emotions play a part in the end result you're going for.


>>
Anonymous 15/12/18(Fri)02:46 No. 12368 ID: 9ecb57

Emotions wear off and reasoning does not.




Jurispudence (philosophy of law) Jroihcnh-a-r-d-s 14/08/07(Thu)10:19 No. 11672 ID: aaad3e [Reply]
11672

File 140739959346.jpg - (7.43KB , 263x192 , images.jpg )

There are convincing ethical arguments for the legalisation of blackmail. You can find them online.

Being convinced of those arguments, in a jurisdiction where blackmail IS illegal, is blackmail unethical?


>>
Anonymous 15/11/30(Mon)08:03 No. 12351 ID: eb915c

There are convincing ethical arguments for the legalisation of penis. You can find them online. 

Being convinced of those arguments, in a jurisdiction where penis IS illegal, is penis unethical?


>>
Anonymous 15/12/13(Sun)14:18 No. 12367 ID: 53fc09

nice wenis op>>11672




Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason