search for programmr. i think you may have to pay for it after a while, but it's good.


also, my favorite band is anal cunt meets caramelized booty sweat

>I don't want to stare at a wall of text
Maybe you should do something else then.

lol i just spent literally 10-11 nonstop hours of sitting with a java book in front of my face. i have the drive, but its actually the amount that i can absorb that is the problem!!!

Yeap no OP. Firstly I firmly believe that you trying to shoehorn programmers into merely three distinct personality types is fucking stupid and shallow.

>I don't know WTF I'm doing or what's the best most strategic way of doing this is.
This is quite fine, usually. But it's your fucking attitude that makes it not fine. Don't know how something works? Well, you got it working in the first place, don't say fuck it it's done, read it again and try to learn how it works. Google anything you don't know and read about it at least once and us it as a stepping stone to learn something new, you lazy faggot. It's fine to make mistakes, especially if you know you're making them. And finding the 'best' solution to a problem *is* your job as a programmer, not something you read on the internet or recall from memory. Change your perspective and try to understand your position.

>I'm terrible at *
That's a shitty attitude to have no matter what you do.

Then there are the part timers/hobbyists, who have been assigned to implement something relatively simple and well contained on the basis they are the best there is available in-house.

They stampede around the existing code base like an elephant in a glass store, bash it with wildly inappropriate tools and plenty of search and replace, copy and pasting without time to fully learn the language or the framework, until they have something vaguely working done. With no understanding how much time the job should have taken, they feel their performance at least was sub par, so they hastily wrap it up omitting all code refactoring and usually the proper version management and commit procedures too.

Like so, I'm a welder and have been assigned to fix the company web page. Wont be pretty to look, when the best qualifications are like "I made a home page for my cat in 2003".

Use the [code][/code] tags. I didn't pay much attention to your code, but "seen" should be a set, not a list. Searching in a list takes O(n), whereas the search on a set should take O(log n). A set uses add to insert elements instead of append.
Also, I don't understand what exactly you want.

What I want is to take a random video eg: a video from xvideos.com/tags/<insert tag here>. What I mean by 'take' is get the link for that video since the mpv video player can network stream videos from that site based on links.
So, based on the link xvideos.com/tags/latina,there seems to be links to videos, right? And I get the link for any of those videos eg: http://www.xvideos.com/video10095/alexis_amore_m3m_( a link in latina tag)
And then, I give this link as an argument to mpv, which will network stream the video for me.

>>4518
I used the [code][/code] tags, I didn't know what happened, ill just post a pomf late since pomf is down now

i am afraid that we are. i'd be okay with it as long as i can keep my memories of this life if i ever get out. i don't want to forget a certain person, or the lessons i've learned..

it's not probable, but it's very possible..

someone who can point me in the right direction

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=bitcoin+payment+api

Foo, why don't you take the void out of main method in sup and create a whole new method name while you're at it, like

public static String letter;

public static String Letters() {
Random r = new Random();
int randomNumber = r.nextInt(1000);

if (randomNumber < 50) {
letter = "A";
}else
if (randomNumber < 80) {
letter = "B";
}else
if (randomNumber < 140) {
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>4490
Great thanks. But could you explain why my way didm't work?

I never programmed in C# but this is a bit of C++ that can do the job pretty well.

char * data_to_check = the data you want to check;
unsigned int i = 0;
if(data_to_check[0] == '-') i = 1;
while(data_to_check[i] != '\0'){
switch(data_to_check[i]){
case '0':
break;
case '1':
break;
case '2':
break;
case '3':
break;
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

Dead thread, but why not just try a regex?

Regex alpha = @"^[a-zA-Z]+$";

Regex numeric = @"^[0-9]+$";

if (alpha.IsMatch(textbox1.Text))
{
...
}

if (numeric.IsMatch(textbox1.Text))
{
...
}
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

The try parse method should be used in an if statement instead to avoid the extra conditional operation. From the if statement, you will find that the proper assignment was made and then you will have the option to execute a command accordingly or otherwise.

This sounds like a good idea, but by the time I figure out an exploit or do anything with it, it has already been outdated.

That's been around since September last year.

It spawned because of captcha on /prog/, although I guess you could call that ``killing world4ch'' in a way.

did moot really think killing world4ch would stop people moving on from 4chan? hell new sites like https://dis.4ct.org/prog/ started in the wake of world4ch's death, millions of lost users over many site all because moot sucked SJW dick.